- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CNN Can Not Understand Why We Can Not Arrest The Drug Runners and Bring Them to Trial.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:45 pm to wackatimesthree
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:45 pm to wackatimesthree
It is typical of the liberal, rather than simply answering the question to provide some long winded response that beats around the bush and refuses to admit that the answer the question is no
Specifically there is nothing in anyway identified or mentioned regarding the AEA as a justification for these actions
Further as I'm sure you now realize there is nothing in the constitution that prohibits these actions
Finally there is no codified law on the books currently that prohibit these actions
Congress could certainly vote tomorrow to stop these actions but that has not yet been done
Whether there is a UN violation of some sort may be up for debate but I think most Americans could give two craps about the UN
Specifically there is nothing in anyway identified or mentioned regarding the AEA as a justification for these actions
Further as I'm sure you now realize there is nothing in the constitution that prohibits these actions
Finally there is no codified law on the books currently that prohibit these actions
Congress could certainly vote tomorrow to stop these actions but that has not yet been done
Whether there is a UN violation of some sort may be up for debate but I think most Americans could give two craps about the UN
0
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:52 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Do you want every nation killing people they claim are "terrorists?"
don't the countries that have terrorists kinda all ready do this with American's (I'm sorry infidels). I'm sorry they ransom them....wait up...
should we do that with the narco folks?
Are they worth any money? Do their countries give a shite about them
so many more questions
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:53 pm to gaetti15
quote:
don't the countries that have terrorists kinda all ready do this with American's (I'm sorry infidels)
I guess we can just call anyone a terrorist, and make it stick these days.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:55 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I guess we can just call anyone a terrorist, and make it stick these days.
you haven't noticed that's kinda how the world works now
well has worked since 9/11
This post was edited on 12/9/25 at 2:56 pm
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:58 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:The world has always been full of gullible people, willing to accept the word of their chosen demagogues.
I guess we can just call anyone a terrorist, and make it stick these days.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 3:00 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
I guess we can just call anyone a terrorist, and make it stick these days.
The world has always been full of gullible people, willing to accept the word of their chosen demagogues.
I guess the US military is "terrorist" as we handed out amphetamines like candy in WWII
Posted on 12/9/25 at 3:01 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
I don’t agree with the terrorist designation. I assume it’s just a legal classification so we can use the current Authorization of Use of Military Force to conduct the campaign.
I’d be perfectly fine with calling the drug traffickers and killing them.
I’d be perfectly fine with calling the drug traffickers and killing them.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 3:02 pm to Timeoday
Well, first of all, its because they are in small burning pieces, floating in the ocean.......you know, because we bombed their pussies into extinction
Its very had to cuff them at that point, much less read them their rights
Its very had to cuff them at that point, much less read them their rights
Posted on 12/9/25 at 3:07 pm to CapnKangaroo
quote:
I’d be perfectly fine with calling the drug traffickers and killing them.
quote:
During the war, one in three Allied soldiers were incapacitated without a physical scratch on them. Modern weapons and warfare proved so terrifying that almost as many men were shredded by combat fatigue and shell shock — now known as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) — as by bullets and shrapnel. Allied commanders believed Benzedrine, an amphetamine similar to Pervitin, was the answer, hoping the amphetamine would defeat not just the need for sleep, but anxiety and fear among troops. How this drug affected the course of World War II is an ongoing controversy.
Your own military was trafficking drugs.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 3:10 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Going on msnbc soon with MTG I see Well...good luck.
Well...good luck.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 3:13 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Your own military was trafficking drugs.
Would you like me to go back in time and tell the generals from 85 years ago that drugs are bad?
Posted on 12/9/25 at 3:16 pm to CapnKangaroo
quote:
Would you like me to go back in time and tell the generals from 85 years ago that drugs are bad?
They already knew, and did it anyway.
I bet you still call many of them "Heros." So do I, because I understand how the world works, and you apparently are living in some Pollyanna land where you think there is a difference between drug dealers.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 3:18 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
, you're telling me we don't have the legal authority to arrest them, but we have the legal authority to wipe them off the face of the earth?
Yep
Posted on 12/9/25 at 3:19 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Sure do.
I bet you still call many of them "Heros." So do I, because I understand how the world works
quote:
and you apparently are living in some Pollyanna land where you think there is a difference between drug dealers.
There is a difference
Posted on 12/9/25 at 3:20 pm to CapnKangaroo
quote:
There is a difference
Not at all. There is no difference. Traffickers are traffickers.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 3:21 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Sure pal. And I live in a fantasy world
Posted on 12/9/25 at 3:22 pm to CapnKangaroo
quote:
And I live in a fantasy world
Absolutely.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 3:32 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Leary's argument was basically "It is effective." Yes, it is certainly that. It is also illegal and unconstitutional.
You people seem to be OK with that.
You're got dam right im ok with it......Hell I voted for it three times and will again
Posted on 12/9/25 at 3:34 pm to NytroBud
quote:
You're got dam right im ok with it.
MAGA baws diss the constitution, I'm shocked...
Posted on 12/9/25 at 3:36 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
MAGA baws diss the constitution, I'm shocked...
There’s nothing unconstitutional or illegal about attacking the boats. If you want to say it’s morally wrong or just bad policy then that’s valid. I’d disagree with you but it’s a valid opinion at least.
Page 12 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News