- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clinton judge could toss Tish James and James Comey cases
Posted on 11/13/25 at 9:54 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 11/13/25 at 9:54 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
boosiebadazz
What a piece of shite you are
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:08 am to Bama Mountain
quote:Who are you? SPF junior? Knew a LOT of "barracks lawyers" when in the military. Like you and he, they were full of shyte too.
It is a very weak case.
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 4:21 am
Posted on 11/14/25 at 5:36 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
What a piece of shite you are
quote:
RohanGonzales
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 5:44 am
Posted on 11/14/25 at 7:06 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
The people Trump appoint step on his dick a lot.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 7:16 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
This post has been marked unreadable!
Posted on 11/14/25 at 7:22 am to jrobic4
quote:
Needs to meet the business end of a noose! Until we start holding these traitors accountable for tusurping government authority that belongs to the people, this will continue to happen.
Did you feel the same way about Aileen Cannon?
Posted on 11/14/25 at 7:45 am to boosiebadazz
At some point, words which are employed to promote a contrarian subjective belief in a battle for absolute authority become more divisive that a slap in the face of one’s opponent. The Left has already embraced political assassination (think Charlie Kirk and the reaction therein) and it is just a matter of time before the Right is forced to. Trump’s strategy to surreptitiously militarize Civil LE via enforcing deportation and urban violence policy and form the structural institutional basic for the inevitable and violent confrontation is obvious to those who look beyond the daily legal dramas.
Note that they are laying the evidentiary groundwork for a ‘Grand Conspiracy’ prosecution. Rogue and complicit Judges would be front and center. I have no idea how this plays out in the long run, as economic conditions will factor in. But it will be inevitable and big.
Note that they are laying the evidentiary groundwork for a ‘Grand Conspiracy’ prosecution. Rogue and complicit Judges would be front and center. I have no idea how this plays out in the long run, as economic conditions will factor in. But it will be inevitable and big.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 8:14 am to Shiftyplus1
quote:Yet another straightforward question that is being made unnecessarily partisan.
Apparently if you're a Democrat you can just do whatever you want.
Halligan was not properly appointed. Black and white.
If it were Biden, rather than Trump, everyone here would agree.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 8:22 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
quote:
At the core of the argument is the question of whether the US attorney general — in this case, Pam Bondi — can make multiple interim appointments to fill a US attorney position when the candidate can’t get confirmed by the Senate.
quote:
James and Comey are seeking to have their cases — for bank fraud and lying to Congress, respectively — dismissed on a technicality, claiming Bondi used up her one opportunity to appoint someone to the empty position for a 120-day period when she installed Halligan’s predecessor.
Whitaker countered during Thursday’s hearing, “The attorney general is entitled to multiple 120-day appointments.”
This right here is some absolute bullshite. That would only buy them time though, as the next confirmed prosecutor would pick up the case and file new charges. Dems gonna dem though. The Republican Senators better quit playing nice. Nuclear option and ram everything through.
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 8:24 am
Posted on 11/14/25 at 8:30 am to lowhound
quote:
This right here is some absolute bullshite. That would only buy them time though, as the next confirmed prosecutor would pick up the case and file new charges.
It appears me that the effort to exclude Halligan on a technicality is really just a sideshow and will little affect on the core of the case, which is weak IMO.
Popular
Back to top

1







