- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clinton appointed judge rules Trump cant require citizenship proof on federal voting forms
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:53 pm to Bama Mountain
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:53 pm to Bama Mountain
0
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:56 pm to LSUnation78
quote:
Fix it. We have the house and senate. Fix it.
Unfortunately, it is a bit more complicated than that. So far actually implementing it at the state level has been a mess.
Kansas tried it and it was a mess
New Hampshire also tried it this year for local elections and it was also a mess. Married women who have changed their name needed to show birth certificates and marriage certificates as well as state IDs.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:05 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
Married women who have changed their name needed to show birth certificates and marriage certificates as well as state IDs.
Oh noz!!!
The sky is falling!
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:06 pm to LSUnation78
quote:
Fix it. We have the house and senate. Fix it.
The EAC developed the federal form. Not legislation. There’s no reason the EAC can’t make changes to it.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:07 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
Nope, the Constitution is clear on this. This is the job of the States, not the executive branch.
I read your reply wrong. You are correct. The legislation that is held up does deal with national elections and the safeguards that must be in place though. My bad.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:08 pm to stout
Who gives a shite what she thinks?
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:12 pm to the808bass
quote:
Oh noz!!!
The sky is falling!
You might laugh but the courts don't.
The Kansas law ended up blocking the voter registrations of more than 31,000 U.S. citizens who were otherwise eligible to vote. That was 12% of everyone seeking to register in Kansas for the first time. Federal courts ruled it was an "Undue burden" and SCOTUS refused to take it up.
Don't get me wrong, it seems pretty reasonable to have some proof of citizenship to register to vote. The reality is it has been hard to implement, and many citizens were disenfranchised.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:17 pm to stout
Slow fanni pro weighed in yet?
Libertarian seems pretty selective.
Libertarian seems pretty selective.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:26 pm to stout
At some point there has to be repercussions for all of this pr these judges won't stop
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:32 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
Don't get me wrong, it seems pretty reasonable to have some proof of citizenship to register to vote. The reality is it has been hard to implement, and many citizens were disenfranchised.
In what f'in' developed country in the world (or a y, for that matter), can you vote without presenting proper photo ID?
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:36 pm to Bama Mountain
As long as the Trump admin obeys these unconstitutional rulings, might as well not get worked up. Republicans still play by rules in a world without any. It’ll be their downfall again.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:37 pm to umrebel2009
There won’t be because our side is too afraid to do anything about it.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:40 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
You might laugh but the courts don't.
No one GAF what the legal-crit figs say.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:40 pm to Dandy Lion
quote:
In what f'in' developed country in the world (or a y, for that matter), can you vote without presenting proper photo ID?
This isn't about voter ID, this is about requiring proof of citizenship to register.
The way many other countries do it is to have national ID cards and automatically register citizens to vote, which results in high turnout. In America the burden to register is on the citizen.
Regardless, this specific issue is about the Constitution, which is pretty clear on the topic.
This post was edited on 10/31/25 at 7:44 pm
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:43 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
This isn't about voter ID, this is about requiring proof of citizenship to register.
“This isn’t about math. This is about adding two numbers together.”
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:46 pm to stout
They literally just make up shite. Congress needs to start impeaching some of these activist judges.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:52 pm to stout
quote:
Clinton appointed judge rules Trump cant require citizenship proof on federal voting forms
the only requirement there is to vote, and it can't be proven. Along with who you are. Fricking Dem lefties are a special bunch. I hope Trump finds a way to legit defeat this kind of judicial obstruction.
Also, that every Presidential nominee must turn in an original birth certificate.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:55 pm to stout
Weird another ruling the greatest legal mind and libertarian frick ignores.
I am shocked half a million and non existent again.
I am shocked half a million and non existent again.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:58 pm to the808bass
quote:
No one GAF what the legal-crit figs say.
Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett are the "figs" who refused to hear Kansas' appeal.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 8:02 pm to Bama Mountain
66 you can get to 100 wise Latina!
Page 3 of 7
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News