Started By
Message

re: Clayton Lockett got what he deserved

Posted on 5/1/14 at 6:17 pm to
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26833 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

Surprised this thread is still alive. frick that dude. The state set out to kill him; he's dead. What's the problem?


Is there any line that they can't cross then? What if they tortured him for 24 hours? He's dead, that was the goal.

Your line of thinking is extremely flawed. Criminal or not, these people are American citizens and the government can't do whatever it wants to them. Start allowing that and you open up a huge can of worms.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
46343 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

Is there any line that they can't cross then? What if they tortured him for 24 hours? He's dead, that was the goal.

Your line of thinking is extremely flawed. Criminal or not, these people are American citizens and the government can't do whatever it wants to them. Start allowing that and you open up a huge can of worms.


I agree. It seems it wouldn't be that hard to kill someone quickly.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138593 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

That's a shame
No.

That is stupid beyond belief.
It sounds like the IV infiltrated.

Regardless, you mean to tell me there is no humane way to execute a murderer?

Here's a thought: Strap a grenade to the back of his head. Pull the pin.

Walk away.

Done!



Questions?

This post was edited on 5/1/14 at 6:33 pm
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 6:32 pm to
will this be televised?

Posted by tiderider
Member since Nov 2012
7703 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 6:33 pm to
he killed her ... there's enough evidence ... it's conclusive ...

he deserved to die at the hands of the government, in whatever fashion befell him ...

Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138593 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

will this be televised?
here it is . . .





Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26833 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

he killed her ... there's enough evidence ... it's conclusive ...

he deserved to die at the hands of the government, in whatever fashion befell him ...


Human rights don't disappear after a conviction.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

Is there any line that they can't cross then? What if they tortured him for 24 hours? He's dead, that was the goal.


The state endeavored to dispose of him humanely. They fricked it up. It's Oklahoma, after all. There are ways to carry out capital punishment that are more humane and more honorable than lethal injection that are frowned upon because the optics are unpleasant.

ETA: I am adamantly, unequivocally opposed to any form of torture.
This post was edited on 5/1/14 at 6:41 pm
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26833 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

The state endeavored to dispose of him humanely. They fricked it up. It's Oklahoma, after all. There are ways to carry out capital punishment that are more humane and more honorable than lethal injection that are frowned upon because the optics are unpleasant.

ETA: I am adamantly, unequivocally opposed to any form of torture


This isn't the first botched execution. And it's not just the manner of execution. I honestly don't trust the government to try people for death. Elected DA's can feel pressure to pin a murder on anyone they can in order to satisfy the public and ensure reelection. I've heard personal stories of this exact thing happening.

It's bad enough for a person to spend his life in prison for a crime he didn't commit. It's morally reprehensible for his life to be ended for it.
This post was edited on 5/1/14 at 7:34 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138593 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

It's morally reprehensible for his life to be ended for it.
Has that happened?
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26833 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 7:21 pm to
If I had to guess in this situation, I'd say no. But it does happen.
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 7:31 pm to
quote:

It's bad enough for a person to spend his like in prison for a crime he didn't commit. It's morally reprehensible for his life to be ended for it.


I'm pretty dang sure this has happened at some point. Sometimes life just gives you the shitty end of the stick, like the baby that died in this case.
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

Clayton Lockett got what he deserved

Yes, he did. And some other Americans who have no objection to being seen as titillated by the sight of torture got what they deserved, too.

Those of us who see no entertainment value in watching another human suffer needlessly didn't deserve this. Kill the man.... I have no problem with it. But I don't like being guilty of the same sort of thing he's being put to death for.

Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
38133 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

quote:
It's morally reprehensible for his life to be ended for it.
Has that happened?



Someone innocent being executed?
Posted by tiderider
Member since Nov 2012
7703 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

Mickey Goldmill
Clayton Lockett got what he deserved
quote:
he killed her ... there's enough evidence ... it's conclusive ...

he deserved to die at the hands of the government, in whatever fashion befell him ...


Human rights don't disappear after a conviction.


his did ...there was, in this case, irrefutable evidence he committed the crime ... a very heinous crime ...

his rights ended the minute she died ...
This post was edited on 5/1/14 at 8:19 pm
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 8:18 pm to
quote:


Yes, he did. And some other Americans who have no objection to being seen as titillated by the sight of justice got what they deserved, too.


FIFY
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26833 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

his did ...there was, in this case, irrefutable evidence he committed the crime ... a very heinous crime ...

his rights ended the minute she died ..


No they didn't. Do you know anything about our legal system?

I'm not defending the man. I'll honestly say I don't know enough about the case to form my own opinion on whether or not he committed the crime. Without such knowledge, I'll defer to the court.

My point is, there are many cases where people on death row are later exonerated, some luckily before execution and some sadly after execution. These people still had legal rights even after conviction.
This post was edited on 5/1/14 at 9:03 pm
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 10:31 am to
quote:

I'm not defending the man. I'll honestly say I don't know enough about the case to form my own opinion on whether or not he committed the crime. Without such knowledge, I'll defer to the court.

My point is, there are many cases where people on death row are later exonerated, some luckily before execution and some sadly after execution. These people still had legal rights even after conviction.


The 19 year old woman's legal rights sure ended immediately after he murdered her so screw him if his legal right to be executed humanly got botched up.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram