Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Clancy trial question on “appreciating the wrongfulness”

Posted on 9/4/26 at 6:56 pm
Posted by baybeefeetz
Member since Sep 2009
33022 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 6:56 pm
The commonwealth had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she appreciated the wrongfulness of her actions. I’m sure that could be proven with circumstantial evidence.

But if a person just up and decided to kill their kids one day without saying a word or hesitating or trying to conceal it and never spoke of it and never spoke a word about why, how would you prove that she truly appreciated it was wrong?

That’s a high arse burden.

Thread title is not optimal. Question isn’t really necessarily about Clancy. I honestly don’t know the facts of her case.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 6:58 pm
Posted by Feelthebarn
Lower Alabama
Member since Nov 2012
3840 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 7:11 pm to
Lindsay clancy was a nurse. She knew it was illegal to dr shop to acquire excessive amounts of prescription narcotics. That is "voluntary intoxication" under the law, which should completely nullify an insanity plea. This prosecutor was a retard
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
83778 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 7:27 pm to
The fact that she designed a plan where her husband was not at home convinces me that she knew it was wrong, otherwise she would have tried to do it while he was home.

Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
14469 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 7:43 pm to
Thank goodness one man stood for the children.

Assign the next trial to a new prosecutor and have at it!
Posted by uggabugga
Maryland
Member since Aug 2024
5950 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 7:43 pm to
Yep. She absolutely knew it was wrong.
Posted by Patato Salad
New Orleans
Member since Mar 2009
1332 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

how would you prove that she truly appreciated it was wrong?


quote:

I honestly don’t know the facts of her case.


Posted by Bwmdx
Member since Dec 2018
3493 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:54 pm to
If she didn’t think it was wrong then why did she try to kill herself
Posted by Wolfwireless
Member since Aug 2024
5801 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:15 pm to
I honestly think that this was a problem caused by the decision that the court has to prove insanity. Rather than the defense.
That turned this trial into a shitshow.
But there was mismanagement of this case. Big time.
Posted by JimEverett
Member since May 2020
2666 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:15 pm to
I am in no way trying to defend the Mass system and sure as hell not defending that bitch Clancy.
But you do have to present some minimal degree of evidence that the defendant is incapable of forming an intent (in the legal sense) to commit murder before the burden shifts to prosecution.
So the initial burden is still on defendant, even if it is light, to show insanity.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
73629 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:23 pm to
It was as premeditated as it gets. She’s a murderer, Massachusetts is pure evil.
Posted by Megasaurus
Member since Dec 2017
1675 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

But if a person just up and decided to kill their kids one day without saying a word or hesitating or trying to conceal it and never spoke of it and never spoke a word about why, how would you prove that she truly appreciated it was wrong?



I do have an appreciation for the fact that there are individuals who are incapable of understanding right from wrong. This is simply just not the case here. This woman had a job, drove to work everyday, was raising her children (before she decided to kill them...1 at a time...)
She obviously understands she has to be at work on time, if not...consequences...she drives to work every day, stops at red lights and stops signs...consequences..she was 100% functional. She knew what she was doing. Now lets replace her kids and say she killed someone else's kids, or her neighbor or whoever else..if that were the case it wouldnt have made the news and this would be open and shut.

The insane part about all of this are the soul-less pieces of shite who can even remotely try to justify the actions of this psycopath. I mean are we really , honestly wanting to know if a person murders their 3 children, if we should question their ability to appreciate the wrongfulness of their actions? This was a good tactic used by a good defense atty who faced a weak prosecuter, now the dregs of society have another national hero to help them embrace their own shitty lives.
Posted by baybeefeetz
Member since Sep 2009
33022 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 5:57 am to
wtf are you saying? I know she killed her kids and was depressed or whatever. I don’t know what she did to prepare, I don’t know what she said after,
Etc.
So go frick yourself.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram