re: "Civil Union" versus "Religious Marriage"

quote:

---

Once homosexual marriage was legal, gay families were added to health discussions in public school.

---

In what context? That homosexuality exists is not new. Besides, curriculums in public schools are a state or local issue and is not related to whether two men can civilly marry each other. Your point here is too attenuated from the actual legal act, IMO. You’re fighting the culture war, and I’m on your side in that.

quote:

---

You can read about the goals for gay marriage from the activists themselves. It wasn’t “so we can visit each other in ICU.” That’s for the dipshits like you.

---

I don’t care what their goals are or were. They aren’t relevant to my point.

quote:

---

Now business owners must cover gay spouses for health insurance if they cover straight spouses. That’s just one of a hundred different examples.

---

I see your point here, but I don’t think we’re going to agree on the nature of the issue. It’s so unfathomable for me to even consider caring what one of my employees does in his off time or who he fricks that I cannot relate to caring about who is covered as an additional insured under our policy. The underwriting process takes care of the inherent risks in that…lifestyle.

In what context does gay marriage impact the curriculums? I don’t have experience with it, my children will never step foot in the abhorrent public schools where I live.