Started By
Message

re: Church Celebrates Transgender Pastor's Transition With 'Renaming' Ceremony

Posted on 2/12/18 at 9:56 pm to
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58041 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

There is no worse sin as such. There is no weight given to sins.


There are sins that are worse for society and families, and certain sins like, adultery, the Bible describes as sinning against your own body. Plus, there are list throughout the Bible of specific sins that will prevent a person from entering heaven.
So while I know what you are saying, it isn't entirely accurate. And that's not even bringing up the sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46511 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

It's not a continual act.


But remarriage is
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46511 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

There is no worse sin as such. There is no weight given to sins.


That's not true (again, if the Bible is to be believed)

I don't personally believe any of it but the Bible is very clear that some sins are worse than others.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30897 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

It's apparent that if you don't like what The Almighty created, you have choice to recreate the mistake and make it alllll better.


So like plastic surgery?
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30897 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

Should the church quit preaching the Ten Commandments so as not to offend the thieves, liars, adulterers, murderers, etc? Of course not, so why is it making exceptions for homosexuals and other sexual deviants?


Well, first off, most of the laws you reference are in Leviticus, which Christ Himself said you are no longer bound by - only the Ten Commandments.

It was Peter, coming along much later, that thought gay men were icky (didn't have a problem with hot girl-on-girl action though). He did say women should be silent though - a very popular take, I'm sure.

Most "Christians" are actually "Paulians" - taking about 75% of their focus from Paul instead of Jesus.
Posted by G The Tiger Fan
Member since Apr 2015
103775 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 10:08 pm to
I first read this as a "Reaming Ceremony".
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
31504 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

Martin Luther would be ashamed to have his name associated with such a "church". 


Ecumenical understatement of the century.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64666 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

That's not true


I am listening.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30897 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

But remarriage is


Jesus spoke several times on divorce, stating that if you were divorced for any but a very tiny list, you were in a perpetual state of sin. You spent all your days as an adulterer, and if you were the husband you were forcing your wife to be an adulterer as well.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58041 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

But remarriage is


I'm not trying to defend divorce or any other kind of sin Roger.
Posted by Big12fan
Dallas
Member since Nov 2011
5340 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

Jesus turned water to wine,



And Jeremiah was a bullfrog. The sexual transition is not a myth.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58041 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 10:23 pm to
quote:

Well, first off, most of the laws you reference are in Leviticus, which Christ Himself said you are no longer bound by - only the Ten Commandments. It was Peter, coming along much later, that thought gay men were icky (didn't have a problem with hot girl-on-girl action though). He did say women should be silent though - a very popular take, I'm sure. Most "Christians" are actually "Paulians" - taking about 75% of their focus from Paul instead of Jesus.


So let me get this straight. Paul, who taught the exact same thing that all of this Old Testament did about homosexuality was somehow off track for personal reasons?
Did not God himself in the Old Testament condemn homosexuality? Didn't Jesus say, " I do only what I see the Father do", and " the Father and I are one?"
So I'm to believe that Jesus had a diffent view of homosexuality than his Father's and Paul was simply making up theology as he went along?

The Bible is 100% consistent in its condemnation of homosexuality in both Old and New Testament and there are no verses in either that paint homosexuality in any other light except negative and sinful.
This post was edited on 2/12/18 at 11:02 pm
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58041 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 10:30 pm to
quote:

Jesus spoke several times on divorce, stating that if you were divorced for any but a very tiny list, you were in a perpetual state of sin. You spent all your days as an adulterer, and if you were the husband you were forcing your wife to be an adulterer as well.



From Grace to You Ministry;

Jesus is saying that the act of remarriage is an act of adultery. He is not teaching that the ongoing conjugal relationship with the new spouse is a state of “perpetual adultery”--as if God refused to recognize the remarriageas legitimate in any sense.
If that were the case--if the ongoing physical relationship between the remarried couple constituted one long, continuous, adulterous affair—the proper remedy, and the only way to end the chain of adultery, would be to dissolve the second marriage and insist that everyone return to his or her original spouse. On the contrary, Scripture teaches that the new marriage is now binding. In order to avoid further acts of adultery, the remarried person needs to remain faithful to the new spouse.
As a matter of fact, in the same passage where Moses permitted husbands to issue a certificate of divorce, the law added this restriction: “When she has departed from his house, and goes and becomes another man’s wife, if the latter husband detests her and writes her a certificate of divorce, puts it in her hand, and sends her out of his house, or if the latter husband dies who took her as his wife, then her former husband who divorced her must not take her backto be his wife after she has been defiled; for that is an abomination before the LORD” (Deuteronomy 24:2-4, emphasis added).
Clearly, the second marriage—whether biblically justified or not—becomes as binding as the original marriage was supposed to be. A return to the original spouse is strictly forbidden.
So Jesus’ words in Matthew 5:32 (and Mark 10:11-12) mean simply that entering into an illegitimate remarriage is an adulterous act. Nevertheless, once that new marriage covenant is sealed, the remarried couple needs to remain married and be faithful to one another. Their on going physical relationship is not to bethought of as “perpetual adultery.”



Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

Most "Christians" are actually "Paulians" - taking about 75% of their focus from Paul instead of Jesus.
this seems awfully hard to quantify as you are doing. also, you seem to be drawing a distinction between paul and Jesus. do you feel they are saying different things?
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram