- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Christmas themed, all ages drag show in TX
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:03 am to AggieHank86
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:03 am to AggieHank86
quote:
You be you, but I put significantly more stock in detailed studies and analysis by professionals
The same profssionals that can't define the word "woman"?
The same professionals that time and time again have been caught using flawed and or biased methods to push a false narrative?
Those professionals?
Again, it's curios to some (not me) why you are so passionate about pushing this false narrative.
0
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:05 am to AggieHank86
quote:
The relationship between victim age and gender crossover was examined using chi-square and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The proportion of offenders with victims of both genders significantly increased as the victims' ages decreased, and sex offenders with preschool-age victims were most likely to have abused both boys and girls. A sex offender with a victim 6 years of age or younger had more than 3 times the odds of having perpetrated sex crimes against both genders than a sex offender with only older victims. Sex offenders with victims of both genders had more than 3 times the odds of having preschool victims.
So as the distinction of appearance grows the gender specificity grows.
You literally posted a link proving the other poster correct and spiked the football.
What a clown.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:06 am to AggieHank86
quote:
The sample consisted of 362 sex offenders being considered for civil commitment as sexually violent predators in Florida...... Data were collected from file reviews.
Wow, nice sample size spread over a large area there.....
And all that data collected from FILE REVIEWS instead of rigorous, multimple follow up interviews with all involved.
Nice....
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:10 am to AggieHank86
quote:
NIH
Is run by a political appointee, and anything that touches the gay orbit has been politicized for quite some time. There may be something to it, there may not, but I'm not blindly buying their conclusions when the topic is politically charged.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:11 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
So as the distinction of appearance grows the gender specificity grows.
You literally posted a link proving the other poster correct and spiked the football.
What a clown.
I don't think he understands to be honest.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:13 am to Flats
quote:
but I'm not blindly buying their conclusions when the topic is politically charged.
Hell, forget Politics, these sort of studies depend on the Perp self-identifying sexually.
Hank once posted a study from the 80's where people were MUCH less likely to identify as Homosexual as proof of his agenda.
Bottom line: When a man sexually interacts with another man, it is homosexual or bisexual in nature, period..
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:15 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I don't think he understands to be honest.
No, he thinks WE don't understand.
Hank is a Narcissist so he gets sloppy sometimes.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:15 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I don't think he understands to be honest
To be fair the religious zealots that perform these studies are incapable of discerning their own findings.
Because they are bat shite.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:17 am to BengalOnTheBay
quote:how many years has this annual brunch gone on?
Join Gulf Coast Equality as we present our annual Christmas Drag Brunch
quote:could not resist, so i looked up the place. i suppose there is a demand to have a church feel wedding without actually having to conform to the church.
which will be held at The Chapel at Centennial Plaza
quote:
Tickets are $45.00 in advance or $50.00 at the door.
holy shite. i won't pay that for a brunch with regular entertainment, much less the freak show.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:19 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:It’s almost like you do not speak English.
So as the distinction of appearance grows the gender specificity grows. You literally posted a link proving the other poster correct and spiked the football.
My point was related specifically to PEDOPHILES. Not to hebephiles. Not to ephebophiles. Pedophiles.
By definition, pedophiles are attracted to children prior to the development of secondary sex characteristics. Again, the pathology of a pedophile is very different than the pathology of a hebephile or ephebophile.
It is your insistence that all three are the same that is preventing you from understanding the point. If you set aside that bias and try to understand the distinct pathologies, you will understand the issue more thoroughly.
This is important. You cannot address and prevent sexual molestation of prepubescent children, if you have your brain stuck on high center, thinking about young teens. Different offenders, different pathologies, different crimes.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:21 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
To be fair the religious zealots that perform these studies are incapable of discerning their own findings.
Absolutely.
They're trained in key words which they believe is very important to chance culture, but they have no clue what they mean.
Its a quasi religious cult that destroys everything in its path.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:23 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Different offenders, different pathologies, different crimes.
At the core of all three are some degree of sexual attraction.
In EVERY instance of male on male sexual interaction, the Perp is gay or at the very least bi.....every....fking....time, no exceptions.
THAT is the point of this.
Homosexual or Bi-sexual people COMMIT 100% OF SAME-SEX SEXUAL ASSAULT, PERIOD.
YOUR crusade never gets out of the gates when faced with logic.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:24 am to AggieHank86
quote:
My point was related specifically to PEDOPHILES. Not to hebephiles. Not to ephebophiles. Pedophiles. By definition, pedophiles are attracted to children prior to the development of secondary sex characteristics. Again, the pathology of a pedophile is very different than the pathology of a hebephile or ephebophile. It is your insistence that all three are the same that is preventing you from understanding the point. If you set aside that bias and try to understand the distinct pathologies, you will understand the issue more thoroughly. This is important. You cannot address and prevent sexual molestation of prepubescent children, if you have your brain stuck on high center, thinking about young teens. Different offenders, different pathologies, different crimes.
None of this changes that same sex attraction and pedophilia appear intertwined according to your data.
If we can't admit hard truths we can't address problems.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:26 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Are there plenty of ephebophiles (attracted to late teens) in the gay community? Sure, but are their numbers any greater than ephebophiles in the straight community?
If there was, there is little chance social scientists would tell us.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:28 am to Azkiger
quote:
If there was, there is little chance social scientists would tell us.
This times one million.
Long ago, there was a thread concerning a certain study that ascribed intelligence with certain racial components.
MY question was merely this: IF there were a study that proved beyond all doubt that certain races were indeed more intelligent than others, would those studies EVER see the light of day?
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:31 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:That is not what the data appears to say.
None of this changes that same sex attraction and pedophilia appear intertwined according to your data.
The data seems to show that pedophiles (again prepubescent children) are most likely to offend against both genders. Only after puberty does a gender preference seem to predominate.
Gender preferences develop, apparently, as the children begin to develop secondary sex characteristics.
Are some of these offenders attracted to post-pubescent boys? Yes
Are some of them attracted to post-pubescent girls? Yes.
By definition, they are not “pedophiles.“
The point I made, which seems to have several of you wrapped around the axle, dealt exclusively with pedophiles. Not hebephiles. Not ephebophiles.
It is not possible to have a reasoned discussion which lumps these three groups together into a single category, because their pathologies are entirely different.
This post was edited on 12/6/22 at 8:35 am
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:32 am to AggieHank86
quote:
It’s almost like you do not speak English.
A "professional" who cannot simply defined the word "woman" should be excluded from EVERY serious conversation, agreed?
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:34 am to AggieHank86
quote:d
That is not what the data appears to say.
NIH and small sample size aside, do you not see a problem with the way that summary is presented?
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:35 am to AggieHank86
quote:
The data seems to show that pedophiles (again prepubescent children) are most likely to offend against both genders.
Those particular pedophiles are Gay or Bisexual, not Heterosexual.
A pedophile who commits inter-sex crimes exclusively is Heterosexual.
This isn't as hard as you are purposefully making it.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:36 am to oogabooga68
quote:
A "professional" who cannot simply defined the word "woman" should be excluded from EVERY serious conversation, agreed?
frickin aye.
Page 8 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News