- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chinese Tanks to Protect State-Run Banks: Money Is "Investment Product" No Withdrawals
Posted on 7/21/22 at 2:35 pm to BuckyCheese
Posted on 7/21/22 at 2:35 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
No reason electronics, and anything else, can't be made here.
Except that these things will be far more expensive. And our consumption-based economy generates far too many jobs for Americans to do them all. We will have to import staggeringly high numbers of foreigners to accomplish this.
I’ll quote Matthew Yglesias’ daily email, from today actually:
quote:
My general view is that whether we’re talking about labor or housing, restricting supply in order to raise prices is a terrible idea. But prices rising due to strong demand is good. The problem facing Chicago and other midwestern cities is that low demand is not an affordability strategy — it’s a recipe for failure. And the solution, fundamentally, has to come from outside the region.
The only reason that falling relative demand for Chicago is translating into falling absolute demand for Chicago is that overall American population growth has slowed to a crawl as the once-robust flow of immigrants has turned into a trickle and the birthrate has continued to decline. In the longer run, we should be doing much more to support parents and children. But in the shorter term, the country would benefit from significantly more immigration. I’d be thrilled to defer to immigration skeptics about exactly which immigrants we let in and under which terms, but it should be more people. Make them speak English, make them pass some public charge test, make them have college degrees or score over 100 on an IQ test or whatever you want. But it ought to be more people.
Per capita GDP in Illinois is higher than Norway and more than 50 percent higher than Italy, to say nothing of the many countries around the world that are poorer than Italy. Whatever Chicago’s problems, there are billions of people on the planet who could secure superior opportunities in life by gaining permission to live there. And there could be big advantages to the United States in accelerating our population growth rate rather than allowing cities with below-average demand to slip into spirals of decline.
I will add that if we can engage the African-American community, and get them participating in the economy like everyone else, we will solve some of this.
Posted on 7/21/22 at 2:40 pm to Penrod
Taiwan doesn't have a low standard of living and they make the shite out of electronics.
Electronics manufacturing is highly automated.
Electronics manufacturing is highly automated.
Posted on 7/21/22 at 7:03 pm to Wisdomcries
I used to travel back and forth to China regularly before the pandemic. Nearly every Chinese city is full of empty apartment buildings and depopulated parts of the city. The real estate bubble in China is massive and that alone will cause a shock wave in the world. Also, the amount of US banks, companies and financial investment in China is massive. When China’s economy collapses these American banks, companies and investors will take a massive hit as well. It’s a totally corrupt economic power and no one seems to care or seem concerned, just keep feeding the monster.
Posted on 7/21/22 at 7:06 pm to VoxDawg
Brandon's team is taking notes


Posted on 7/21/22 at 7:07 pm to VoxDawg
Who does Xi think he is? Justin Trudeau?
Posted on 7/21/22 at 7:08 pm to Wisdomcries
quote:
I didn’t know Africa had tech and civil infrastructure
Wakanda, yo!
Posted on 7/21/22 at 8:20 pm to Westbank111
quote:
The Fed system and Fed backed banks have a policy where they loan out $9 for every $1 on hand in deposits. They are making YUGE MONEY via Interest rates on Invisible money that is not even in the bank, it’s backed by nothing.
The fed sets the percentage of assets that must be liquid, in case people want cash, it is around 10%. Its not loaning out 9 times the amount of money they have in deposits. And yes banks do loan out 90% of their assets, its how they make money.
Posted on 7/21/22 at 9:57 pm to trinidadtiger
quote:
The fed sets the percentage of assets that must be liquid, in case people want cash, it is around 10%. Its not loaning out 9 times the amount of money they have in deposits.
The multiplier of reserve requirements across the system is 1/(required reserves). So 10% reserve requirements results in a systemwide multiplier of 10.
In theory, everything else remaining equal, reserve requirements of 10% result in a multiplier of 10. So there’s ten times as much money being lent as there are in deposits.
Puts the whole reverse repo situation in perspective, doesn’t it?
This post was edited on 7/21/22 at 10:01 pm
Popular
Back to top

1








