Started By
Message

re: China Joe Bans Transporting Natural Gas By Rail

Posted on 9/5/23 at 9:42 pm to
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

He sold some of his railroads for a pipeline company. That is how he profited off the Keystone Pipeline cancellation since he had some rail lines that would benefit by expanded rail for oil cargo from the oil sands of Canada.


This regulation doesn’t affect moving oil by train, only natural gas.
This post was edited on 9/5/23 at 9:42 pm
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

You mean when it boils off and turns back into a gas? Then it becomes flammable, obviously. The article said LNG is flammable, which is a false statement


I mean if there’s a leak, like the Freeport leak. Jfc, that’s what everyone including the article is talking about.
Posted by G2160
houston
Member since May 2013
2096 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

This means they have pipes ready to go as an alternative means of transport, right?


Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but LNG isn’t transported by pipeline, except in short distances adjacent to the LNG facility.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

This regulation doesn’t affect moving oil by train, only natural gas.


They want to ban transport of "dirty" oil by train next.

Someone here knows the correct term for "dirty" oil I'm sure. It's pretty damn flammable. It's what the train that blew up half a town in Canada was hauling.


Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62602 posts
Posted on 9/6/23 at 12:37 am to
quote:

A bad idea isn’t good bc the other side points out that it’s bad.

No one said thst it was. What’s odd is the burden of proof is on the people to prove the regulation isn’t harmful, not on government to show its a good idea.
quote:

Aside from the danger it’s just inefficient.
This isnt a thread about the merits of transportation methods.
This post was edited on 9/6/23 at 12:38 am
Posted by BlueDogTiger
Member since Jan 2014
1429 posts
Posted on 9/6/23 at 4:27 am to
The modern day environmental movement is a front for Marxist and the destruction of our national security. If you ask yourself how do our enemies benefit from this decision when you read about these types of rules are proposed, then you will understand what’s going on.

China and Russia are successfully destroying our fuel operations without firing a shot. All by manipulation of our liberals here at home.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram