Other than the possibility that Russian nuclear missiles may fly (there other missiles fail at 60% rate), they are no substantive threat to the US Military. The reason such a small economy can field so many tanks and other military hardware, is the hardware is of total shite quality. One of their jets downed in Ukraine had a Garmin taped to the control panel because the built in navigation was for shite.

China, we can beat them for now, but they are getting stronger.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Jake88

Member since Apr 2005

78373 posts

Posted on 7/10/22 at 12:53 pm to LSUFAN3016

quote:
Buckle up WWIII is here and will be hot soon!

Another looney tune on the board I see.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Penrod

Member since Jan 2011

52687 posts

Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:26 pm to Strannix

quote:
Ok

So you think Trump got run out?

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Load Toad

Haughton, LA

Member since Aug 2008

2487 posts

Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:30 pm to LSUFAN3016

Some areas of world the US isn't equipped to fight. This might be one of them.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Wolfhound45

Member since Nov 2009

126699 posts

Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:31 pm to LSUFAN3016

quote:
LSUFAN3016

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by LookSquirrel

Old Millville

Member since Oct 2019

7654 posts

Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:52 pm to Marquesa

quote:
(there other missiles fail at 60% rate)

Where does this info come from?

Russia has hypersonic missles that we cannot match, which makes our aircraft carriers sitting ducks. We have almost depleted our arsenal by giving it away and "IF" a war were to go hot, we have lost our ability to produce them in the amounts needed to fight for longer than a few weeks. We have lost our industrial base and we can't find enough welders and electricians etc., to get on a "war footing" anytime soon. Then there is the matter of fuel. How do we keep the non nuclear vehicles in the fight?