Started By
Message

re: Chief Justice Roberts says No to Impeachment of Trump/Harris could preside over the trial

Posted on 1/23/21 at 9:49 am to
Posted by AURaptor
South
Member since Aug 2018
11958 posts
Posted on 1/23/21 at 9:49 am to
CJ Roberts wants NOTHING to do with any kabuki ish show that remotely has to deal with facts being brought to light.

This is an extra Constitutional event, not a legitimate function of Congress. Everyone knows this.


Just like with the Steele Dossier, the 4 FISA warrants issued illegally, the wire tapping of the Trump Towers, the imprisonment of Gen. Flynn, ...it's ALL for show.

Who here honestly doesn't get this by now???
This post was edited on 1/23/21 at 9:51 am
Posted by leeman101
Huntsville, AL
Member since Aug 2020
1502 posts
Posted on 1/23/21 at 9:53 am to
quote:

quote:
I'd love to see Kamala put Trump on trial

Madea goes to court starring kamala harris.


Or Debbie I mean Kamala does the GOP (for the votes.)

I sense a Bukkake senate GOP party with Kamala hosting, cuming up.
This post was edited on 1/23/21 at 9:55 am
Posted by IceTiger
Really hot place
Member since Oct 2007
26584 posts
Posted on 1/23/21 at 10:04 am to
quote:

They want no part of allowing Trump anywhere near a court room.


That's a bingo
Posted by ForeverGator
Elite 8 - 2020 Worst SECRant Poster
Member since Nov 2012
13007 posts
Posted on 1/23/21 at 10:21 am to
Ah, an opinion piece that has no evidence of Roberts saying this or anything. I doubt he would make public statements regarding an ongoing case.

This is very CNN-esque in having an opinion piece appear as “news.”
Posted by bluedragon
Birmingham
Member since May 2020
6470 posts
Posted on 1/23/21 at 10:39 am to
Do the Democrats not realize the significance of selecting Leahy to preside?

Leahy would not be able to vote ....That reduces the population from 100-99

Democrats still lose the charade because Republicans already see the outcry over Cheney and the turncoat nine in the House ..There are nine identified Senators that will "Listen" to the charges but refuse to say they will vote to convict.

There will not be a conviction because of the risk of losing their seat in their next election cycle.
Posted by bowlbound
Member since Oct 2017
629 posts
Posted on 1/26/21 at 5:12 pm to
Did they just appoint Leahy to preside over the trial?
Sounds a lot like BS, idiot.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram