Started By
Message

re: Charles Koch in the WSJ

Posted on 4/2/14 at 11:01 pm to
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 4/2/14 at 11:01 pm to
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57428 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:26 am to
quote:

Instead of encouraging free and open debate, collectivists strive to discredit and intimidate opponents. They engage in character assassination. (I should know, as the almost daily target of their attacks.) This is the approach that Arthur Schopenhauer described in the 19th century, that Saul Alinsky famously advocated in the 20th, and that so many despots have infamously practiced. Such tactics are the antithesis of what is required for a free society—and a telltale sign that the collectivists do not have good answers

Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57428 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:29 am to
quote:

With no limits to spending then person A can buy all the "speech" he wants, effectively drowning out the speech of everyone else around him who can't buy that much "speech". It gives him unequal access and favor and makes his vote inherently more valuable than anyone else's.
The 1A is about FREE speech. Not fairness.

quote:

If you think that that's a good thing then I guess that's you're right but to me it will create an oligarchic class that will result in a very small number of people holding the vast majority of political power. The republic will essentially be dead.
Odd assertion. For the majority of our Republic's existence, no limits have been imposed.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57428 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:30 am to
quote:

So to fix this, Fedgov restricts person A's speech.
It's the only way we can be free.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57428 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:31 am to
quote:

No, to fix this Fedgov ensures that your speech can't be drowned out by someone else's speech, which is effectively restricting YOUR speech.
Aye. So... does this mean if my neighbor gets at two guns, the government should give me two guns? Or take both of his away? You know... so we have equal right to bear arms.

Also, does this mean all newspapers get the same amount of words for each edition? We wouldn't want one newspaper having more freedom of the press than another, right?

The only "freedom of speech" guaranteed by the Constitution is that the government will not limit the activities of citizens. It does not give you a right to be heard.
This post was edited on 4/3/14 at 12:41 am
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
15052 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:34 am to
Cmon dude, you can't seriously be saying that conservatives don't try to smear liberals. You know better than that.

Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57428 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:36 am to
quote:

I can now go to Hillary or Rand or some senator or whoever and tell them I will donate 10 million dollars a month to their campaign every month in perpetuity. What kind of access is that going to get me?
That depends on Hillary or Rand. Your beef should be with legislators that can be bought. Not people that attempt to buy them.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57428 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:39 am to
quote:

Cmon dude, you can't seriously be saying that conservatives don't try to smear liberals.
?? Where did I make that claim?
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
10994 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 6:53 am to
quote:

at someone's political OPINION being "right" and someone else's "wrong"

Posted by Bayou Sam
Istanbul
Member since Aug 2009
5921 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 9:28 am to
?

Schopenhauer was not a "collectivist," which is a dubious concept anyway.

On the other hand, the oldest story in politics is oligarchs buying friends and using ideology to advance their material interests.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 9:30 am to
quote:

the oldest story in politics is oligarchs buying friends and using ideology to advance their material interests.



so the solution is to give more power to the people being bought(i.e., politicians)!

Brilliant!
Posted by Bayou Sam
Istanbul
Member since Aug 2009
5921 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Taxing Authority


Not even the justices who wrote this decision agree with your way of characterizing the case.
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14519 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 9:52 am to
quote:

No, to fix this Fedgov ensures that your speech can't be drowned out by someone else's speech, which is effectively restricting YOUR speech.


In the age when for $14.95 a month any yahoo can get a webpage and start a blog, I find the idea of someone's speech getting drowned out implausible.

What does this scenario look like? Can you point to an election where it happened?
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 10:22 am to
This should be required reading for every citizen.
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 10:27 am to
quote:

it's ok to ensure that everyone gets a chance to speak and have their voice heard.

Do the union members get to vote on how "their" donations get spent politically or do the union bosses make those decisions. I truly don't know the answer, but if the members don't get to vote on it, isn't that stealing their free speech?
Posted by Bayou Sam
Istanbul
Member since Aug 2009
5921 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 10:34 am to
quote:

so the solution is to give more power to the people being bought(i.e., politicians)!


Get help.
Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
30922 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Get help.

nice rebuttal
Posted by CITWTT
baton rouge
Member since Sep 2005
31765 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 10:40 am to
Bozo said he would take the moral high ground on that idea until he was the candidate in '08 and then just sucked in the bucks like a well SUCKING vacuum cleaner on steroids. The left seems to somehow to always found lacking in the truth telling department on an overwhelming amount of what comes out of their mouths.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57428 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 10:47 am to
quote:

The left seems to somehow to always found lacking in the truth telling department on an overwhelming amount of what comes out of their mouths.
To be fair we're stereotyping here. But with that qualification... what I do find odd is that the left consistently tells us that character and personal morality don't matter. Yet... They are indignant that politicians can be bought.

It's an instance of getting exactly what we ask for.
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
10994 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 10:50 am to
quote:

On the other hand, the oldest story in politics is oligarchs buying friends and using ideology to advance their material interests.
Not as old as the subliminal message underpinning every form of government or *ism...that if we could just get the right people or make the right reforms, then finally it would work.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram