Started By
Message

re: CATO Institute: don’t complain about illegals if you don’t support legal immigration

Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:00 am to
Posted by Hennigan
Member since Jan 2020
1498 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:00 am to
No thanks Cato. They have to go back and we don't want any more.
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
17719 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

libertarianism meant either being so ridiculously ignorant of legal immigration laws

You have to take anything published "widely" like Cato with a grain of salt when it comes to libertarianism. It's infected with a lot of intellectuals that are the libertarian version of communists, "it'll work, it just hasn't been tried properly," type. Or, they tend to be the sovereign citizen whackjobs and similar.

Most actual libertarians are what most people would consider conservative: stay the hell out of my business, take less of my money, but I'm good with school buses and sewer systems.

I suspect the libertarian ivory tower hates people like Milton Friedman saying shite like,
quote:

“You cannot simultaneously have free immigration and a welfare state. ... As long as you have a welfare state, I do not believe you can have a unilateral open immigration. I would like to see a world in which you could have open immigration, but stop kidding yourselves. ”


They hate his simplicity, and that of fellows like Thomas Sowell. They ignore why Germany, France and the UK take inordinate amounts of economic refugees from the Middle East any why few refugees seem to want to stay in Portugal, Italy, Austria, etc.
Posted by KingOfTheWorld
South of heaven, west of hell
Member since Oct 2018
8001 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:23 pm to
We’ve had enough immigration for a while, legal or otherwise. A 10-year moratorium would help.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
159270 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:30 pm to
I support legal immigration

Emergency Quota Act of 1921: Limited annual immigration to 350,000 people. It set a quota for each country at 3% of the foreign-born population of that nationality living in the U.S. based on the 1910 census.

Immigration Act of 1924 (the Johnson-Reed Act)
Lowered the cap to roughly 150,000 total immigrants per year from outside the Western Hemisphere. It changed the quota base to 2% of each nationality's foreign-born population living in the U.S. as recorded in the older 1890 census.
Targeting Southern and Eastern Europeans: Using the 1890 census intentionally reduced the allowed number of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe (such as Italians and Slavic groups) because fewer members of those groups lived in the U.S. in 1890.


Total Asian Exclusion: The law banned all immigrants from Asian countries by declaring anyone ineligible for U.S. citizenship barred from entry.
Posted by soonerinlOUisiana
South of I-10
Member since Aug 2012
2823 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:33 pm to
frick CATO. Using their logic, we shouldn’t complain about illegal rape and murder if we don’t support legal rape and murder. fricking “think tank” people who don’t have real jobs.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
48335 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:39 pm to
frick this twerp. Legal immigration barriers aren’t static. They should continually bend to meet the current needs of our country. There will be times when we need to lower barriers to entry, and there will be times when the gates need to be locked.

Full stop.
Posted by Harvey Vortac
MidCity
Member since Aug 2024
637 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:43 pm to
If you make killing impossible don’t complain about murder
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram