- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/29/17 at 9:07 pm to buckeye_vol
Are you a moron or do you just play one on the internet?
Require and request are not the same.
Require and request are not the same.
Posted on 6/29/17 at 9:07 pm to buckeye_vol
Now he's just arguing for the sake of arguing.
But as I've said earlier. It's known, expected, but mostly predictable.
But as I've said earlier. It's known, expected, but mostly predictable.
Posted on 6/29/17 at 9:07 pm to Iowa Golfer
quote:Well they can access:
there is probably federal code giving certain federal departments access to voter rolls,
quote:
States should maintain all written records related to applications to register to vote as well as declinations to register to vote.
Posted on 6/29/17 at 9:09 pm to RTRinTampa
quote:Well fine they can access applications and declinations for voter registration.
Are you a moron or do you just play one on the internet?
Require and request are not the same.
Posted on 6/29/17 at 9:11 pm to buckeye_vol
Wouldn't that equate to voter rolls? and those that were denied?
You're arguing just to argue. I'll trust Judicial Watch on this one, not PT contrarians.
You're arguing just to argue. I'll trust Judicial Watch on this one, not PT contrarians.
This post was edited on 6/29/17 at 9:28 pm
Posted on 6/29/17 at 9:12 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:No. I'm saying that the states aren't legally requires to compel with the request of everything in this:
Now he's just arguing for the sake of arguing.
quote:They are compelled to turn over the applications and declinations of voter registration so they should turn those records over.
the full first and last names of all registrants, middle names or initials if available, addresses, dates of birth, political party (if recorded in your state), last four digits of social security number if available, [and] voter history from 2006 onward”
Posted on 6/29/17 at 9:13 pm to Contra
Voting is a states' right issue, no? I thought conservatives were all about states' rights.
Posted on 6/29/17 at 9:14 pm to OnTheGeaux
quote:As it pertains to applications for registration sure. But they want more than that.
Wouldn't that equate to voter rolls? and those that were denied?
quote:What did Judicial Watch state? They threatened to sue states who weren't updating registration. They are compelled to update registration, but that's not the issue here.
I'll trust Judicial Watch on this one, not PT contrarians.
This post was edited on 6/29/17 at 9:17 pm
Posted on 6/29/17 at 9:17 pm to buckeye_vol
I think all they would need are the ROLLS, man.
I got to give it to you. You're like Rocky Balboa. You keep getting up. And getting up. And getting up.
Good for you, bub.
I got to give it to you. You're like Rocky Balboa. You keep getting up. And getting up. And getting up.
Good for you, bub.
Posted on 6/29/17 at 9:17 pm to member12
quote:
The Spleen
There ya go member12. You called it.
Posted on 6/29/17 at 9:18 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
What did Judicial Watch state? They threatened to sue states who weren't updating registration. They are compelled to update registration, but that's not the issue here.
Reread the article.
Posted on 6/29/17 at 9:19 pm to Contra
Send in troops to retrieve them
This post was edited on 6/29/17 at 9:20 pm
Posted on 6/29/17 at 9:22 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:If applications and declinations for voter registration are considered rolls, then fine. Voting history is not a part of registration though.
I think all they would need are the ROLLS, man.
Posted on 6/29/17 at 9:23 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
No. I'm saying that the states aren't legally requires to compel with the request of everything in this:
No. You came into this thread waving your big constitutional dick around, threw it on the table, and had it smashed in the drawer by people who actually know the law.
Now you're backtracking and saying that something different OTHER THAN the Feds can get fricked.
It's what you always do. It's what makes an argument or debate with you excruciatingly painful.
I'm out.
Posted on 6/29/17 at 9:25 pm to Errerrerrwere
Don't argue with him. What I do is let him go. And he does. As in tens of thousands of posts. Like the Energizer Bunny.
Posted on 6/29/17 at 9:26 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:Nobody has shown any law that requires all of that information to be turned over, especially to a commission.
No. You came into this thread waving your big constitutional dick around, threw it on the table, and had it smashed in the drawer by people who actually know the law.
quote:Wait. This started with this quote by you:
Now you're backtracking and saying that something different OTHER THAN the Feds can get fricked.
quote:But I see how many people love their big federal government. I'm sure you would have loved if the Obama administration tried digging into every voter's history.
Send the FBI in and arrest the damn governor.
This post was edited on 6/29/17 at 9:29 pm
Posted on 6/29/17 at 9:26 pm to Errerrerrwere
Well said.
Ditto
quote:
I'm out.
Ditto
Posted on 6/29/17 at 10:04 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
You came into this thread waving your big constitutional dick around, threw it on the table, and had it smashed in the drawer by people who actually know the law
Yikes.
Posted on 6/29/17 at 10:25 pm to Contra
Isn't that the Pointing? To legitimize the allegation by proving it to be true??? What kind of stupidity are we dealing with here???
Popular
Back to top


1




