Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

California' Is Laying Groundwork for Gas Appliance Ban

Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:29 am
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
27821 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:29 am
The heading could be "how stupid are these people?"

Electric heat, hot water and cooking is 4 or 5 times more expensive than natural gas. It is also the cleaner than any other source except nuclear.

quote:

The state is also on the brink of banning all natural gas appliances in the state, in every single home. This will cost the average California homeowner tens of thousands of dollars to remove gas connections and install electric. On a grid that's notoriously unreliable anyway. Imagine not being able to cook during rolling brownouts.


https://townhall.com/news/amy-curtis/2026/09/16/california-moves-to-ban-all-gas-appliances-n2683044
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
14639 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:57 am to
I can remember when natural gas was referred to as the clean energy.
Posted by Gee Grenouille
Member since Jul 2018
8733 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 11:01 am to
They want control over your energy, and shutting down the power plant is easier than controlling the pipeline and gas/oil companies.
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
43941 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 11:08 am to
The stupid people in this equation are the brainwashed citizenry who believe the bullshite being peddled by their DNC overlords. The overlords know exactly what they're doing.
Posted by Tigersforthee
Member since Dec 2025
366 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 11:10 am to
The muh democracy/no kings crowd loves when the govt strips them of their freedom, as long as its done by a D.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
27821 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 11:10 am to
We have a 2 family rental property in NYC. It is just under 3,000 sq. ft. and uses natural gas for heat, hot water and cooking. In the dead of winter, the gas bill runs between $400 to $500 per month.

An old friend has a 600 or so sq ft condo that has electric heat and it costs her $600 or more. The condo provides hot water and she has gas for cooking. She doesn't keep it toasty warm either.

Going all electric is insanely expensive in NYC and Calif.
Posted by LSUtoBOOT
Member since Aug 2012
21573 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 11:21 am to
quote:

I can remember when natural gas was referred to as the clean energy.

I can remember when California’s population was growing and not shrinking, they gotta keep the momentum going.
Posted by Rip Torner
Member since Jul 2023
3681 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 11:23 am to
California is a testing ground for the rest of the US for the Left. Many will regret giving them power but to be honest I couldn’t care less. The US will get what it deserves and I am pretty isolated from those inevitable consequences
Posted by GurleyGirl
Georgia
Member since Nov 2015
14623 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 11:40 am to
They are getting what they voted for.
Next they will require solar panels on every roof at the homeowners expense of course.
Posted by BurlesonCountyAg
Member since Jan 2014
5466 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 11:44 am to
Newsom has finally done it! He solved global warming!
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
15246 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 12:38 pm to
1) electrical infrastructure is already taxed and becoming insufficient (we are not building enough electricity production facilities to keep up with growth. this incudes NG, coal, wind, hydro, solar, nuke)

2) majority of our electricity come from NG, so killing NG at the point of use, will push more use are the origin, and worse, push to more coal or older, less efficient NG plants to kick it to pick up the load.

3) transmission losses, transformer losses from power distribution is less efficient then NG distribution losses.

4) electrical point of use water heaters are limited by residential infrastructure. a 100k BTU gas instantons WH needs about 30kW to have the same GPM output. (120 amps at 240v) most houses dont have an electrical panel to support that. so most will go tank type to give more storage with less recovery.

5) the US is a net exporter of NG. we have an abundance so less risk to geopolitical issues with supply

6) much higher chance to lose electricity from weather events and natural disasters then to lose NG

Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
62068 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 12:40 pm to
We have more natural gas than we know what to downright in this country and it’s cleaner and cheaper than anything else we currently use for power.

Please make this make sense to me liberals.
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
70499 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 12:47 pm to


As clean as it gets
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram