- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ca$h Patel Sounds Like David Hogg…
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:00 pm to Robin Masters
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:00 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
Some states you can bring a gun to a protest, some states you cannot.
And in MN, the way their own laws are written, Pretti was unlawfully carrying because he did not physically possess his permit while he chose to conceal a weapon.
It's really that simple in spite of how the shills want to muddy the waters. Plus, by MN law, Pretti (if he had legally been carrying) had a duty and an obligation to avoid confrontation. He chose to seek it.
So in summation, the man had a history of conflict with ICE, had previously had a physical altercation with them just a week prior, and then h3 chose to break the law by illegally carrying out a firearm and then break it again by seeking to interject himself into the disruption of law enforcement operations in legally definable ways. I'm really not sure why we're even still taking about this.
But more to the point of the OP- Ka$h is dumb for saying what he said. So is Bessent and so was Noem. Even Trump. They should have just stuck with minimalistic commenting while all the facts came out in stead of convoluting things more when they didn't themselves know the laws or details.
1
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:01 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
quote:
Your responsibilities when you CC go up, not down. You have a responsibility to conduct yourself in a proper, responsible manner when you carry a firearm. Intentionally arming yourself and injecting yourself into a situation where you act out and act aggressively is not conducting yourself in a responsible manner. I don’t give a single flying frick how many CC permits he had or if God himself signed them, he repeatedly acted like a damn deranged lunatic on multiple occasions. He was on a path to get himself shot and killed whether it was last week or 6 weeks from now.
I agree until the last sentence. He did nothing with the gun. Videos (SO FAR haven't shown him using it or even pulling it. Looks like the ICE guy got it from him and it worst case it was a POS Sig misfiring.
I get the ICE officer POV. Hear gunshot, neutralize threat. He shouldn't have brought it. He shouldn't have been there. Those 2 facts don't mean he should've been shot 5 times as he's on the ground.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:02 pm to Srbtiger06
You dont have to use the gun while you are committing the crime for it to be illegal for you to carry it.
He was disarmed like a second before other officers shot him. But im not arguing whether it was a good shoot or not. I'm just telling you that he was not legally carrying once he decided to interfere with a law enforcement operation.
He was disarmed like a second before other officers shot him. But im not arguing whether it was a good shoot or not. I'm just telling you that he was not legally carrying once he decided to interfere with a law enforcement operation.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:03 pm to antman123
quote:
wrong, “You cannot bring a firearm loaded with multiple magazines to any sort of protest that you want. It's that simple.” So, when his sort of protesting was to interfere with law enforcement, then he can not bring a fire arm. what patel is saying is pretty clear according to what you posted. No where does patel say you can not bring a weapon to a protest, he said you can not bring a weapon to "any kind of protest you want". you seem to want to change what he said now so that you can cry about something he didnt say
And I am tired of seeing politicians play word games with the 2nd Amendment.
As the nation’s top law enforcement officer, we should demand that Patel be extra diligent in choosing his words when discussing our 2nd Amendment Rights.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:05 pm to Toomer Deplorable
If i tell you that you wont lose weight if you eat any sort of food you want, am i telling you that you cant eat food. He's not playing word games just because you cant understand his words.
This post was edited on 2/2/26 at 10:06 pm
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:08 pm to antman123
quote:
You dont have to use the gun while you are committing the crime for it to be illegal for you to carry it.
Don't be pedantic. He never threatened anyone with it. Sure, he had it. Having a gun doesn't give carte blanche to kill someone.
quote:
I'm just telling you that he was not legally carrying once he decided to interfere with a law enforcement operation.
What is the punishment here? They removed the gun. HE did not pull the trigger on it. LEO should've said he was disarmed. There were like 6 guys on him.
It was retarded, but he didn't really threaten anyone here.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:09 pm to antman123
quote:
He's not playing word games just because you cant understand his words.
No, Kash is just retarded.
Like someone else said, if this was Garland saying this then this board shite a collective brick.
This post was edited on 2/2/26 at 10:11 pm
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:10 pm to Toomer Deplorable
People are around LEO's every day and they are armed. There's proper ways to do so. You don't inject yourself into an arrest wearing one and even worse not inform them you're armed thats just asking for it.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:10 pm to Toomer Deplorable
The republicrat party shows its cards.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:13 pm to Srbtiger06
quote:
It was retarded, but he didn't really threaten anyone here.
Sorry but he did. To start with he was not carrying a legal weapon. He had no ID nor his permit.
He them butts into a law enforcement operation carrying a firearm and did not inform the LEO's that he was armed. Hes not carrying ID nor a permit, and hes carrying a large number of rounds for his weapon., Sounds to me like he was up to no good.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:15 pm to Srbtiger06
quote:
Like someone else said, if this was Garland saying this then this board shite a collective brick.
Yeah this is total bullshite
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:16 pm to antibarner
quote:
Sorry but he did. To start with he was not carrying a legal weapon. He had no ID nor his permit.
Not having a permit isn't threatening behavior.
quote:
e them butts into a law enforcement operation carrying a firearm and did not inform the LEO's that he was armed. Hes not carrying ID nor a permit, and hes carrying a large number of rounds for his weapon., Sounds to me like he was up to no good.
So we're fine with government regulations now. Cool.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:17 pm to Srbtiger06
You didnt mention butting into an arrest with a gun and not telling the cops, Stupid.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:19 pm to antibarner
quote:
You didnt mention butting into an arrest with a gun and not telling the cops, Stupid.
It was absolutely stupid, but again, what did he do with the gun? Have it without his ID on him? If that is the standard to kill someone now then we're gonna have some fun if a dem gets in office.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:44 pm to antman123
quote:
Was he illegally protesting when he spat on officers, kicked their car, and interfered with operations?
Again, I’m not defending any illegal actions that Pretti that was engaged in — such as spitting on officers, kicking their car, or interfering with legitimate police operations. Pretti should have been arrested for all that.
I have stated here REPEATEDLY that the legal right to carry does not give anyone the right to commit a crime. For the umpteenth time, I am simply saying that carrying a firearm to a protest in and of itself is not inherently illegal nor does it demonstrate malicious intent.
So my focus is solely on the general legality of carrying a firearm to a protest, which is a wholly separate issue from the criminal actions that may have occurred during the protest. Patel has conflated these two distinct issues, and in doing so risks empowering anti-2nd Amendment activists.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:53 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
So in summation, the man had a history of conflict with ICE, had previously had a physical altercation with them just a week prior, and then h3 chose to break the law by illegally carrying out a firearm and then break it again by seeking to interject himself into the disruption of law enforcement operations in legally definable ways. I'm really not sure why we're even still taking about this.
The extreme irony here is the dumbass would STILL be alive if only Minneapolis police were actually doing their job and arrested him for these crimes.
quote:
But more to the point of the OP- Ka$h is dumb for saying what he said. So is Bessent and so was Noem. Even Trump. They should have just stuck with minimalistic commenting while all the facts came out in stead of convoluting things more when they didn't themselves know the laws or details.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:57 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Exactly. But the OP is a total moron
A clown is defending a fellow clown. Why am I not surprised?
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:01 pm to antman123
quote:
He's not playing word games just because you cant understand his words.
Ca$h is a disingenuous tool.
And only an idiot or a disingenuous tool would defend that clown.
Which one are you?
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:02 pm to antman123
quote:
People are around LEO's every day and they are armed. There's proper ways to do so. You don't inject yourself into an arrest wearing one and even worse not inform them you're armed thats just asking for it.
I don’t disagree with any of that.
This post was edited on 2/2/26 at 11:04 pm
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:03 pm to Toomer Deplorable
And i am saying that you are the one conflating it, "any kind of protest that you want" is not the same as any protest.
Like i asked you earlier, if i said you can lose weight but you cant eat any kind of food that you want, i am not saying you cant eat food. Patel is not saying that you cant take a gun to a protest. He is saying that you cant take a gun to "any kind of protest that you want."
You seem to be ignoring that parts where i explain his words to you. Now, if you had posted that Patel should spell everything out that he says so that there is no way people can twist his words to attack him, then maybe i could sort of agree, but not really, since his words seem pretty clear, unless you are trying to spin them just to complain about something.
Like i asked you earlier, if i said you can lose weight but you cant eat any kind of food that you want, i am not saying you cant eat food. Patel is not saying that you cant take a gun to a protest. He is saying that you cant take a gun to "any kind of protest that you want."
You seem to be ignoring that parts where i explain his words to you. Now, if you had posted that Patel should spell everything out that he says so that there is no way people can twist his words to attack him, then maybe i could sort of agree, but not really, since his words seem pretty clear, unless you are trying to spin them just to complain about something.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News