Started By
Message

re: British special forces runs out of ammo, surrounded by ISIS, defeats them

Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:08 am to
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:08 am to
quote:

Good for the British. I applaud them. Remember some reporter doing a special report on tactics employed by the Americans and our allies in the war in Afghanistan. SOP for the French when running low on ammo, or pinned down by the enemy, hunker down and call for support. Not so the Americans, they counterattack.


If the Americans have any sense they will leverage their supporting arms too.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58616 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Usually, if it's dubious or proven false, so many sites don't pick it up.


Come on, man. You posted a bunch of links to tabloid "sources" for one thing.
Posted by Fatal Conceit
Ramblin down that dusty ole road
Member since Jun 2017
594 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:14 am to
Must have studied the Battle of Rorke' s Drift.
Posted by TiggerB8t
Member since Oct 2013
691 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:20 am to
Great report if true....my curiosity however has me wondering if the bad guys were also out of bullets and/or the Brits had some hand grenades in their belts??
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56302 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:22 am to
quote:

No, I don't need to do that. Same reason I don't need to provide you with proof that sea monsters and Air Force tornadoes are make-believe.
So you don't have shite. Shocking.

You should have gone for the gold and said religion. It'd be just as bad a comparison.

So I guess I can just say that any news story is fake and that's that, huh?
quote:

You got got, bro
You got nothing, bro.
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Must have studied the Battle of Rorke' s Drift.


Rorke's Drift was the ammo dump for the Brit columns moving into Zulu land. They had plenty of ammo which is why they didn't get overrun.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58616 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:28 am to
quote:

So I guess I can just say that any news story is fake and that's that, huh?


Again, you're citing tabloids as credible news sources. That's pretty pathetic.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56302 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:31 am to
They did get overrun, and the Zulus didn't run out of ammo either.

And it was 3500 vs. 150.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56302 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Again, you're citing tabloids
So they're all "tabloids?"

I must have missed your infallible citations.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58616 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:38 am to
quote:

So they're all "tabloids?"

I must have missed your infallible citations.


Are you just willingly being obtuse? If so, why?

The initial source is a fricking tabloid. Perhaps the only one of your sources that isn't, is The Washington Times.

And what fricking possible reason would I have to be compelled to provide a source to you? To discredit a report in a tabloid? Do you realize how asinine that is?
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
10908 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:39 am to
quote:

The story goes that the unit had managed to shoot over 20 ISIS turds dead before running out of ammo. Still surrounded by hordes of ISIS fighters, the British special forces operators decided to go out fighting by taking out as many turds as possible.


I remember when Jessica Lynch was a hero too.

Skeptical dog is very Skeptical.

eta. If true, IMO it speaks volumes for the unit being unprepared for their mission.
This post was edited on 7/6/17 at 10:40 am
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112438 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:39 am to
I love feel good stories!
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:40 am to
quote:

They did get overrun, and the Zulus didn't run out of ammo either.

And it was 3500 vs. 150.


You appear seriously confused. At Isandlwana, the Brits were overrun. At Rorke's Drift they were not.

Battle of Isandlwana

The Battle of Isandlwana (alternative spelling: Isandhlwana) on 22 January 1879 was the first major encounter in the Anglo–Zulu War between the British Empire and the Zulu Kingdom. Eleven days after the British commenced their invasion of Zululand in South Africa, a Zulu force of some 20,000 warriors attacked a portion of the British main column consisting of about 1,800 British, colonial and native troops and perhaps 400 civilians.[13] The Zulus were equipped mainly with the traditional assegai iron spears and cow-hide shields,[14] but also had a number of muskets and old rifles[15] though they were not formally trained in their use.[16] The British and colonial troops were armed with the state-of-the-art[17] Martini-Henry breech-loading rifle and two 7-pounder (3-inch, 76 mm) mountain guns deployed as field guns,[18][19] as well as a Hale rocket battery. Despite a vast disadvantage in weapons technology,[20] the numerically superior Zulus ultimately overwhelmed the poorly led and badly deployed[21] British, killing over 1,300 troops, including all those out on the forward firing line. The Zulu army suffered around a thousand killed.[22]"

LINK

At Rorke's Drift an Impi of between 3-4,000 Zulus fell on about 150 Brits but the Brits repelled them.

"He's a Peeler, 7-1-2, come to arrest the Zulus!"
This post was edited on 7/6/17 at 10:46 am
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
16917 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:41 am to
quote:

Where did this happen? London?


Nice.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58616 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:42 am to
quote:

I remember when Jessica Lynch was a hero too.

Skeptical dog is very Skeptical.


But blueboy read all about it in The Daily Star! Do you have a credible source that shows that tabloid report to be false?
Posted by ctiger69
Member since May 2005
30602 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:43 am to
Posted by Parmen
Member since Apr 2016
18317 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:44 am to
We have the best allies don't we folks?
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
10908 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:44 am to
quote:

Do you have a credible source that shows that tabloid report to be false?



Not at the moment, but these things take time. The truth will emerge.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56302 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:45 am to
quote:

Chard realised that the north wall, under near constant Zulu attack, could not be held. At 6:00 pm, he pulled his men back into the yard, abandoning the front two rooms of the hospital in the process. The hospital was becoming untenable; as the loopholes had become a liability: rifles poking out were grabbed at by the Zulus, yet if the holes were left empty, the Zulu warriors stuck their own weapons through in order to fire into the rooms. Among the soldiers assigned to the hospital were Corporal William Wilson Allen and Privates Cole, Dunbar, Hitch, Horrigan, John Williams, Joseph Williams, Alfred Henry Hook, Robert Jones, and William Jones.
LINK
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64485 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:46 am to
The British jave long been legendary when it comes to giving the enemy cold steel. Tommy Atkins don't frick around.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram