- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bring back the Q thread, Bring back the Q thread!
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:02 pm to Louisianalabguy
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:02 pm to Louisianalabguy
... removing the ToE thread was flat out censorship ...
They even removed all posts I had written over a period of 5 years
plain censorship... illegal in any book
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:03 pm to Louisianalabguy
That would be like watching Jaws II. There will never be another Q/TOA as good as the original. The enigmatic drama was outrageously unique. Not to mention that the Feds were taking names with real intent to do harm. That is why the Thread got whacked. Admins did the right thing given the dynamic back then.
RIP TOA.
RIP TOA.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:14 pm to bayou2
One more vote for thread restoration.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:20 pm to RCDfan1950
quote:
Not to mention that the Feds were taking names with real intent to do harm. That is why the Thread got whacked.
... actually, the Feds tried to use the thread --- but failed to prove anything ...
But it was heavy handed censorship all the way around.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:22 pm to bayou2
quote:
plain censorship... illegal in any book

Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:25 pm to Smoky Mountain Reign
Absolutely time to bring back the Q thread. TPA. Let’s Go.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:38 pm to Louisianalabguy
In late October 2020, I had a conversation with Chicken IRL about the Q Thread. He said the thread drew a significant amount of traffic to the PTB, he personally felt like Q was probably not legit and he was concerned about the Feds cracking down on websites discussing Q posts before the 2020 election.
I said there arent any new posts from Q, we definitely dont want to invite scrutiny from the Feds threatening the site and so he and his brother shut it down and I put it on TD Classics for archiving
That’s it, that’s the list
the last post in it is 11/2/20 at 9:18pm by BoarEd
at the time, it had run its course and the owners made an Executive Decision
I said there arent any new posts from Q, we definitely dont want to invite scrutiny from the Feds threatening the site and so he and his brother shut it down and I put it on TD Classics for archiving
That’s it, that’s the list
the last post in it is 11/2/20 at 9:18pm by BoarEd
at the time, it had run its course and the owners made an Executive Decision
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:40 pm to supatigah
quote:
the last post in it is 11/2/20 at 9:18pm by BoarEd
How appropriate
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:43 pm to supatigah
quote:
supatigah
Thanks.
I would have to agree.
It's all out there and in here.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:44 pm to supatigah
Finally confirmed that Chicken is in fact chicken shite and doesn't care about free speech. Thank you for confirming all my posts. Good day sir.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:45 pm to Tider13
quote:
Finally confirmed that Chicken is in fact chicken shite and doesn't care about free speech.
Why does Chicken have an obligation to “care about free speech” to the possible detriment of his business?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:47 pm to boosiebadazz
And what detriment might that be? People will shun this site? Doubtful. Advertisers will run away? Doubtful.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:50 pm to supatigah
quote:
concerned about the Feds cracking down on websites discussing Q posts before the 2020 election.
Thanks for the confirmation. Thought that was it.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:51 pm to boosiebadazz
so far there are two Q threads and no anchors and no deletions, so I doubt the owners care anymore
I can ask about putting it as a locked sticky at the bottom of the PTB for people to read it if anybody cares to do so.
it is filled with great insight and research but most of it is people speculating what the Q posts mean. That is why it was managed so tightly, if we didnt maintain one thread every Q post would have created a flood of new threads on the PTB filled with Q Fanbois, Q haters, people starting threads to speculate, people starting threads to ask questions about it, etc
I can ask about putting it as a locked sticky at the bottom of the PTB for people to read it if anybody cares to do so.
it is filled with great insight and research but most of it is people speculating what the Q posts mean. That is why it was managed so tightly, if we didnt maintain one thread every Q post would have created a flood of new threads on the PTB filled with Q Fanbois, Q haters, people starting threads to speculate, people starting threads to ask questions about it, etc
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:52 pm to Louisianalabguy
Create Q Talk separate from PT.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 9:13 pm to Tider13
at the the time the PTB was not even one of the top 5 boards on this site
this site is a family business and is far more valuable as an LSU related brand than protecting a single thread on a lesser traffic board
in 2020 the MSM and FBI were saying some very scary things about websites that traffic in “propaganda” like Q and the “QANON” cult
so why continue with the thread? why potentially invite the scrutiny?
it had a three year and 6800+ page run
there is zero free speech protections on a private message board. Censorship and First Amendment protections involves the Government not the management of a private business.
this site is a family business and is far more valuable as an LSU related brand than protecting a single thread on a lesser traffic board
in 2020 the MSM and FBI were saying some very scary things about websites that traffic in “propaganda” like Q and the “QANON” cult
so why continue with the thread? why potentially invite the scrutiny?
it had a three year and 6800+ page run
there is zero free speech protections on a private message board. Censorship and First Amendment protections involves the Government not the management of a private business.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 9:18 pm to Richleau
quote:
People will shun this site?
yes, QANON was being called a crazed cult
quote:
Advertisers will run away?
the site uses Google Ads and there were real concerns about TD possibly being hindered from Ad Revenue
but the real concern was noise about Fed scrutiny and crackdowns on websites
plus there were doubts about whether Q was actually legit, so why continue with hosting the thread if it just isnt worth it any more?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 9:25 pm to supatigah
And people here have tried to gaslight the rest of us about J6, but it was pretty wild to watch in real time.
That whole post 2020 election period was a volatile time.
That whole post 2020 election period was a volatile time.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 9:29 pm to BarnHater
quote:
Q was right about everything.
WowwWWWWW!!!!
Popular
Back to top


2









