- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/24/25 at 8:40 am to VoxDawg
Nothing
Will
Happen
Pam Bondi sucks and needs to be impeached!!
Will
Happen
Pam Bondi sucks and needs to be impeached!!
Posted on 12/24/25 at 8:44 am to FLTech
If Pam Bondi is dumb enough to actually try this insanity trying to manipulate the cases to SDFL, it is going to be her magnum opus and will be a historical footnote for decades if not centuries {If we last that long). Y'all better hope this is just puffery for the message boards, X, OAN, and Rumble.
This post was edited on 12/24/25 at 8:45 am
Posted on 12/24/25 at 9:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:IIRC: Brennan's lawyers cite Mike Davis' commentary. Not the CTH.
No that's CTH being idiotic. Mike Davis's silliness isn't going to affect a potential prosecution. They're just whining and flailing.
It was just funny reading them take direct shots at Mike Davis and describing his ramblings as "crazy commentary"
This is weak, and Brennan's lawyers writing a political henchmen brief-- in about the same way Justice Jackson goes retard political.
A GJ in Fla. has been spoken about in bloggerville's X commentary. Never specifics involving anyone, just guesstures. Brennan 's lawyers can't stop commentaries, as his lawyers leak to the NYTimes. It is ludicrous.
As far as venue, it will be interesting to see if Bondi's DOJ has the legal acumen to legally define this.
Posted on 12/24/25 at 9:39 am to ShoeBang
quote:
That's the whole point. We hear about shite like this and then in a few months we will hear that some random Obama / Biden judge throws it out or it somehow magically falls apart like normal. Like clockwork.
Posted on 12/24/25 at 9:47 am to FLTech
You think she determines this? It is up to Trump. She is just the mouthpiece.
Posted on 12/24/25 at 9:49 am to SlowFlowPro
Brennan's lawyers cite many news articles.
Page 10 Mike Davis is cited
It boils down to-no one is allowed to speak ill of Brennan and his corrupt crew. Nor dare judge shop against him-Only they can judge shop and leak to the NYTimes and WaPo.
Page 10 Mike Davis is cited
It boils down to-no one is allowed to speak ill of Brennan and his corrupt crew. Nor dare judge shop against him-Only they can judge shop and leak to the NYTimes and WaPo.
Posted on 12/24/25 at 9:53 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Brennan's lawyers cite Mike Davis' commentary.
They did, and it caused CTH to flail some manufactured concern and then describe Mike Davis's comments as "crazy commentary"'
Hence the "shorts fired" post.
quote:
A GJ in Fla. has been spoken about in bloggerville's X commentary. Never specifics involving anyone, just guesstures. Brennan 's lawyers can't stop commentaries, as his lawyers leak to the NYTimes. It is ludicrous.
You're not posting coherently here.
We knew there was a GJ in SDFL months ago
We knew what they were targeting months ago
Brennan's lawyers are responding how rational people expected months ago
I don't get why there is all this flailing and histrionics
quote:
As far as venue, it will be interesting to see if Bondi's DOJ has the legal acumen to legally define this.
It's going to require conspiracy related charges and probably 50 co-Defendants. They have to create a conspiracy among 3 admins and dozens or people in/out of government over an 8-9 year period to get it to include both Brennan and the MAL Raid.
This post was edited on 12/24/25 at 10:02 am
Posted on 12/24/25 at 9:54 am to cajunangelle
quote:
. Nor dare judge shop against him-Only they can judge shop and leak to the NYTimes and WaPo.
I don't think you understand the situation at hand enough to get into the details.
Posted on 12/24/25 at 10:09 am to SlowFlowPro
This cannot be denied. I don't think Judge Aileen Cannon is pro Trump. She just isn't a rigged leftist Boasberg et el... partisan.
Brennan's lawyers actually cite the raid on MAL as the FBI got fooled (poor babies) and then they go on to justify J6, Crossfire Hurricane, Spygate, and so on and so forth as REASONING and JUSTIFICATION for raiding Trump's residence-MAL.
Brennan will most likely skate if history is followed. But by Brennan's lawyers citing all of Trump's crimes and J6 in the usual Brennan-- braggadocios way, but most especially--the MAL raid.... They SEEM to be biting off their nose despite their own dumb arrogant faces.
Norm Eisen types think they are above all.
This post was edited on 12/24/25 at 10:11 am
Popular
Back to top


0







