Started By
Message
locked post

Breaking: FBI Director Wray Not Cooperating with AG Barr. Burying documents

Posted on 6/14/19 at 11:33 pm
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53464 posts
Posted on 6/14/19 at 11:33 pm
I will say it again... Until YOU, the masses on the right STAND UP and be HEARD, not just by your vote.. Nothing is going to change.

If you don't actually contact by going to see, phone call, email, social media... UNTIL YOU STAND UP AND BE COUNTED, you will be silenced and they will continue to do the same damn things.

Every one of you should be pissed to no end at this! EVERY ONE OF YOU.

It's almost as if you would rather bitch and complain than go out and demand something be done. You are EXACTLY what they want. A complacent group of people.

quote:

House GOP leadership is now convinced FBI Director Christopher Wray is not cooperating with Bill Barr and John Durham’s investigation into the origins of Spygate.

SPERRY: House GOP leadership has soured on Comey replacement Wray. They r now convinced Wray’s not part of the FBI cleanup & not cooperating w AG Barr & is in fact part of the cover-up of #SpyGate scandal after burying documents & refusing to make people available for interview





LINK

Until you stand......
This post was edited on 6/14/19 at 11:39 pm
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19041 posts
Posted on 6/14/19 at 11:35 pm to
There is one way to solve this, fire his arse. Make an example of the man, and let it be known that anyone who refuses to cooperate will be fire too
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53464 posts
Posted on 6/14/19 at 11:40 pm to
Everybody needs to call their senator and their rep.. email them... call daily.

It takes very little time... at all!

Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 6/14/19 at 11:48 pm to
quote:

House GOP leadership has soured on Comey replacement Wray.
I’m pretty sure Nunes has become the main maybe even sole source nowadays (Solomon, Sperry). Either way, when the story about a DOJ investigation comes from the politicians’ belief about the investigation instead of from the DOJ itself, it seems a lot more of pure politics than anything else. And his follow-up tweet that the House leadership is mad at Senator Graham only further supports that.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131369 posts
Posted on 6/14/19 at 11:52 pm to
quote:

fire his arse.


Not enough. Lock his arse up for obstruction of justice.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:06 am to
quote:

Not enough. Lock his arse up for obstruction of justice.
Even if it’s true, how is what was described obstruction? Barr is his boss, so how can he make people who ultimately work for Barr unavailable to Barr unless Barr? And what does “burying documents” even mean? Is he hiding them; how does he hide them; and how do they know they were hidden? This just sounds like politicians spinning something that isn’t a big deal into something nefarious sounding. My guess is that it’s because they suspect they won’t get the result they are hoping for.
Posted by djmicrobe
Planet Earth
Member since Jan 2007
4970 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:06 am to
Lock him up with her. It's her turn to be locked up.
Posted by pwejr88
Red Stick
Member since Apr 2007
36177 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:15 am to
He needs to be fired. If you’re not part of the solution you’re part of the problem.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:17 am to
quote:

He needs to be fired. If you’re not part of the solution you’re part of the problem.
Well then I guess anyone who voted for the reauthorization of FISA and signed into law should be fired.
Posted by Smart Post
Member since Feb 2018
3539 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:19 am to
quote:

Even if it’s true, how is what was described obstruction?

Oh, for frick's sake
Posted by Cali 4 LSU
GEAUX TIGERS!
Member since Sep 2007
6507 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:26 am to
quote:

how is what was described obstruction? Barr is his boss, so how can he make people who ultimately work for Barr unavailable to Barr unless Barr? And what does “burying documents” even mean? Is he hiding them; how does he hide them; and how do they know they were hidden?


My goodness man, this is common knowledge!!!

LINK Don’t believe your lyin’ eyes! Wray lied about spying & hid evidence
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:53 am to
quote:

My goodness man, this is common knowledge!!!
This is common knowledge for anyone who takes Nunes’s representation of facts as accurate and honest. And since Solomon is obviously just serving as Nunes’s ghost-writer at this time, every article he writes should be viewed as a dishonest politician’s (I know it’s redundant) representation of facts.

I mean there are articles dating back a decade about Republican politicians wanting opposition stories published but since they lacked independent verification and knew no competent journalist would publish them, they would just go to Solomon to get them published.

Now he’s not even trying to hide it. Maybe because The Hill thinks so poorly of his journalistic ability but doesn’t care enough to lose the readers he brings in, that labeling his article as “opinion pieces” allows him to get away with it gives The Hill an excuse for terrible journalism.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
23711 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 1:01 am to
If this is true, it would be clear insubordination and Trump could fire him any time he wished.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53464 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 1:22 am to
quote:

buckeye_vol



Can I just say for the whole board.... Screw you.

We all know what went on.


We all see it.

That's why we hired Trump.


You have defended every POS thing that has went on. From the FISA warrant to HRC "investigation" where everybody was given immunity. From Mueller to Comey who took gov documents and leaked them illegally.

You are the poster boy for BY ANY MEANS...

Posted by Cali 4 LSU
GEAUX TIGERS!
Member since Sep 2007
6507 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 1:32 am to
quote:

This is common knowledge for anyone who takes Nunes’s representation of facts as accurate and honest. And since Solomon is obviously just serving as Nunes’s ghost-writer at this time, every article he writes should be viewed as a dishonest politician’s (I know it’s redundant) representation of facts.

I mean there are articles dating back a decade about Republican politicians wanting opposition stories published but since they lacked independent verification and knew no competent journalist would publish them, they would just go to Solomon to get them published.

Now he’s not even trying to hide it. Maybe because The Hill thinks so poorly of his journalistic ability but doesn’t care enough to lose the readers he brings in, that labeling his article as “opinion pieces” allows him to get away with it gives The Hill an excuse for terrible journalism.


No offense but WTH is that diatribe above!?!

You asked about how Wray was obstructing. Well, besides fighting declass, not wanting to call spying---->SPYING, he retroactively (THIS YEAR) classified the following info so that it wouldn't "get out" to the public: Steele going to the DOJ/State just a week prior to the FBI using the Steele Dossier!!!! BUT..................Kavalec's note debunking Steele's story was already out.......OOPS!
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 2:13 am to
quote:

SPYING, he retroactively (THIS YEAR) classified the following info so that it wouldn't "get out" to the public: Steele going to the DOJ/State just a week prior to the FBI using the Steele Dossier!!!! BUT..................Kavalec's note debunking Steele's story was already out.......OOPS!
And my point was that this came from Nunes, who went to a source who will not only publish what he wants but how he wants it represented without any additional verification, scrutiny, or context that would change they what/how in any ways.

And he does this despite knowing only a small but not insignificant segment would read it (or watch it presented in Hannity) let alone believe it at face value.

So my point is that the accuracy and representation of information in these Solomon articles should be evaluated as if presented by a dishonest politician who has to resort to a poorly regarded mouth-piece to present it.

And as it relates to this story, given Nunes’s FISA-Dossier memo, which clearly only showed the facts he wanted presented (lying by omission) to present a narrative that he wants people to believe, my pretty confident what Wray did with the Kavlec Memo is true but what it means and why he did it are far from what he wants people to believe.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 2:35 am to
quote:

From the FISA warrant
Which I’ve only defended under the assumption that the dossier wasn’t the only source as required, but if it was then only the source and lacked what was required, then i can’t defend it.

None of us actually know the truth without the warrant and the evidence in it. But I’m at least willing to admit that I’m making an assumption.
quote:

to HRC "investigation" where everybody was given immunity.
I’m not sure what you’re referring to here. Now maybe I highlighted that giving immunity to get a more powerful target is common, but I don’t remember the discussion let alone defending anything that would be out is the ordinary.
quote:

From Mueller
And I’ll defend this one. He was tasked with a job, and after his report I feel even more confident that he did exactly that.
quote:

to Comey who took gov documents and leaked them illegally.
I believe that I was arguing that Comey can’t illegally copy and communicate his “intellectual property” of his own memory, not that he can just take documents without leaving the document and/or a copy of it.
quote:

You are the poster boy for BY ANY MEANS
Yet I left out the “means” of spamming a message board, starting threads with lies and/or poor sources of information and making it my career like you.
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61260 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 2:37 am to
Trump should fire his arse
Posted by Geauxst Writer
Atlanta
Member since Dec 2015
4960 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 6:11 am to
You conspiracists are nuts. Wray is a Republican, and a good guy. Barr is dangerous and dictatorial and moving us to dictatorship.
Posted by AustinTigr
Austin, TX
Member since Dec 2004
2937 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 6:18 am to
You conspiracists are nuts. Wray is a Republican, and a good guy. Barr is dangerous and dictatorial and moving us to dictatorship

A fake dossier used to obtain a FISA warrant.
Crossfire hurricane.
Insurance plans from FBI agents saying Hillary should win 100 million to nothing.

But Barr is the danger? You goofy f*cks. I have no idea how your minds work.
This post was edited on 6/15/19 at 6:23 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram