- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BOOM! Chaffetz " DOJ IG to investigate leaks"
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:26 pm to NOLA Bronco
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:26 pm to NOLA Bronco
quote:None at all. Why would I? I'd love to see the leakers charged and arrested.
So then I presume you would have no problem with an in-depth investigation to make sure?
You know who I can guarantee doesn't want a real in-depth investigation? The media, IC and democrats on the hill. The last thing they want is the real facts to come out.
1
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:27 pm to Jjdoc
The lefties will never see it coming..the AG investigates and finds wrong doing, but this time it isn't an Obama hack running the Justice Department..kind of reminds me of the end of Constantine where the Devil tells Gabriel " UT OH....Looks like somebody doesn't have your back any more"
Then the screws get turned and the squealing starts. Someone is pulling the strings and I wonder who it is?
Then the screws get turned and the squealing starts. Someone is pulling the strings and I wonder who it is?
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:27 pm to jeff5891
quote:
quote:
like Obama in 2008 before being inaugurated?
So that justifies Trump to do the same?
That's not what he is saying. He's saying that transition teams do this and that it is very LEGAL. Thus the term TRANSITION TEAM. What is it that you thought a transition team does?
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:27 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
That's a fact and verified by a lot of people today including the architect of the NSA and AGs across the US.
Explain for me how AGs across the US would know about warrantless wiretaps directed at the staff of the POTUSE
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:28 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
And they are thinking that someone from hillary or obama's side did it?
The flaw is thinking it was one person.
Nine different intelligence officers from multiple agencies corroborated the charges against Flynn.
All of them said the same thing, Flynn's words to the Russian ambassador about the sanctions were "explicit."
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:29 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
None at all. Why would I? I'd love to see the leakers charged and arrested.
You know who I can guarantee doesn't want a real in-depth investigation? The media, IC and democrats on the hill. The last thing they want is the real facts to come out.
I meant about Trump, Russia and his cabinets connections.
I presume you are 100% on board of that as well.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:29 pm to NOLA Bronco
quote:
Nine different intelligence officers from multiple agencies corroborated the charges against Flynn.
there are no charges per FBI.
try again.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:30 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
And they are thinking that someone from hillary or obama's side did it?
No. They have not made any suggestions. However, this is something that is VERY serious. This is Espionage.
It could be a Bush person, it would not matter. It is a serious crime and it dangerous for our country in dealing with other nations.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:31 pm to NOLA Bronco
quote:
Nine different intelligence officers from multiple agencies corroborated the charges against Flynn.
You're going to be so disappointed
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:32 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
The GOP will look mildly stupid pursuing the leaks behind Flynn getting canned
It's not just that. The conversation leaked between heads of state....
Plus... when it's espionage... Looking stupid is not dealing with it.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:33 pm to CptBengal
quote:
there are no charges per FBI.
try again.
Not charges in the criminal sense, clearly that has not happened, charges in the assertion form of the word, in terms of asserting Flynn explicitly talked to the Russian ambassador about sanctions.
A guy, who, you might remember, was already investigated twice for wrongfully sharing intelligence.
This is not the guy you give a benefit of the doubt too.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:33 pm to NOLA Bronco
quote:Yeah that's the one I was talking about. The democrats don't actually want that. They just want vague innuendos to be able to bitch about in the media and a real investigation will take that away from them. And also put a lot of people in jail.
I presume you are 100% on board of that as well.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:36 pm to NOLA Bronco
quote:
Nine different intelligence officers from multiple agencies corroborated the charges against Flynn.
All of them said the same thing, Flynn's words to the Russian ambassador about the sanctions were "explicit."
Oh great! You have new information. Please share the link.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:36 pm to NOLA Bronco
quote:
charges in the assertion form of the word, in terms of asserting Flynn explicitly talked to the Russian ambassador about sanctions.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:38 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
But is a part of the DOJ. :)
And a huge difference when it involves investigation
Which why he asked the IG. And back to my point, you misrepresented the article
This post was edited on 2/15/17 at 10:41 pm
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:38 pm to CptBengal
Obama is no longer president folks. Need to own up to acts of your tweeter in chief.
This post was edited on 2/16/17 at 12:03 am
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:39 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
There would be people all over themselves to report this.
That's not what usually happens
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:39 pm to NOLA Bronco
quote:
All of them said the same thing, Flynn's words to the Russian ambassador about the sanctions were "explicit."
What were Flynn's words? I'd like to judge them myself. I don't trust the IC, especially the Obama IC. Furthermore apparently the FBI has already stated Flynn did not break any laws. But it's good that Trump got rid of Flynn for lying to Pence. I'd have zero confidence in Flynn too after that lie.
But again, what were Flynn's words.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:40 pm to GumboPot
quote:
But again, what were Flynn's words.
WaPo saw them.
they chose not to show them to their readers.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:41 pm to jeff5891
quote:
There would be people all over themselves to report this.
That's not what usually happens
What??? How naive are you?
Page 5 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News