- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bill introduced to end Secret Service Protection for Trump
Posted on 4/19/24 at 7:16 pm to TigerVespamon
Posted on 4/19/24 at 7:16 pm to TigerVespamon
They want to make it more easy to hit Trump, huh?
0
Posted on 4/19/24 at 7:18 pm to OzonaOkapi
quote:
The OP is a bit disingenuous. The bill does not direct itself specifically to Donald Trump.
This is one of your most disingenuous posts ever, Hank. Especially if you consider the words of the sponsoring congressman. Really not your best work. No wonder you get banned so often.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 7:19 pm to VOR
quote:
Don’t do the crime if you can’t do the time…
He didn’t. And you’re a pathetic human for supporting jailing political opponents. You’re a fascist. Piece of scum fascist.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 7:20 pm to OzonaOkapi
quote:
read the bill.
I did. And I read the words of the congressman that introduced it. This is a really dumb argument, especially for you, Hank. Do better. This one is just pathetic.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 7:21 pm to OzonaOkapi
quote:
If Billy Jeff Clinton or Michelle Obama were convicted of a felony, would it constitute “pure evil“ to deny Secret Service protection to them?
Absolutely.
The intent would be to get them killed.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 7:24 pm to OzonaOkapi
quote:yes
If Billy Jeff Clinton or Michelle Obama were convicted of a felony, would it constitute “pure evil“ to deny Secret Service protection to them?
Posted on 4/19/24 at 7:25 pm to OzonaOkapi
quote:
read the bill.
I did and it’s pretty obvious to those with a moral compass would understand that it’s directed to one person.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 7:27 pm to TigerVespamon
Benny Thompson is a piece of shite.
He’s been the Delta’s rep for 30 years.
It’s deteriorated considerably under his watch. It looks like a bombed out third world country.
He’s been the Delta’s rep for 30 years.
It’s deteriorated considerably under his watch. It looks like a bombed out third world country.
This post was edited on 4/19/24 at 7:29 pm
Posted on 4/19/24 at 7:29 pm to BBONDS25
quote:No, you read the words of a Washington Times reporter, purporting to summarize what Thompson said.quote:I did. And I read the words of the congressman that introduced
read the bill.
This article from The Hill does a much better job of quoting the man’s actual words. For example:
quote:did Trump‘s behavior give rise to this legislation? Of course. But the legislation itself is of general applicability.
”Unfortunately, current law doesn’t anticipate how Secret Service protection would impact the felony prison sentence of a protectee — even a former President,” Thompson said in a statement.
This post was edited on 4/19/24 at 7:31 pm
Posted on 4/19/24 at 7:29 pm to OzonaOkapi
quote:
The OP is a bit disingenuous. The bill does not direct itself specifically to Donald Trump.
Yet, everyone knows that is a fig leaf.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 7:37 pm to OzonaOkapi
quote:
did Trump‘s behavior give rise to this legislation?
Should Bush lose it because of his Iraq lies? Should Obama lose it because he droned a 16 year old American citizen? Jesus you people truly are lemmings.
This post was edited on 4/19/24 at 7:40 pm
Posted on 4/19/24 at 7:38 pm to FearlessFreep
quote:I am going to accept that you are being genuine, and not just argumentative.
If Billy Jeff Clinton or Michelle Obama were convicted of a felony, would it constitute “pure evil“ to deny Secret Service protection to them?quote:
yes
I respectfully disagree. I see no reason to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars per year of our taxpayer money protecting a convicted felon from other felons, regardless of whether his name has a (D) or an (R) after it.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 7:40 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:If convicted of a felony, YES, absolutely.
Should Bush lose it because of his Iraq lies? Should Obama lose it because of he droned a 16 year old American citizen?
Posted on 4/19/24 at 7:42 pm to OzonaOkapi
quote:
I respectfully disagree. I see no reason to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars per year of our taxpayer money protecting a convicted felon from other felons, regardless of whether his name has a (D) or an (R) after it.
You are being disingenuous and the glare is hurting my eyes.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 7:43 pm to OzonaOkapi
quote:
If convicted of a felony, YES, absolutely.
And this response is proof our media is the most effective propaganda machine in world history. Every American President since FDR would be convicted of war crimes under the Nuremberg Code. But I guess a show trial in a hostile jurisdiction is all it takes if you somehow impede the Leviathan.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 7:50 pm to OzonaOkapi
quote:
The OP is a bit disingenuous.
Here comes Hank:
Also, I'll ask you again... did you just tire of being AggieHank or was there some other reason you created an alter and are now posting under it?
This post was edited on 4/19/24 at 7:52 pm
Posted on 4/19/24 at 7:51 pm to OzonaOkapi
quote:
No, you read the words of a Washington Times reporter, purporting to summarize what Thompson said.
Wrong, Hank. I read the bill and what Thompson said. This is a very strange hill for you to die on. Luckily, once L.A. sees youre back, you’ll be gone again and we can be free from you flaming the board daily.
This post was edited on 4/19/24 at 7:55 pm
Posted on 4/19/24 at 7:52 pm to OzonaOkapi
quote:
did Trump‘s behavior give rise to this legislation?
Behavior of activist and unethical DAs and judges gave a dem congressman an opportunity to propose a law to harm trump. This is really really dumb even for you. Lost some respect for you on this one. You should be banned again.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 7:54 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
read the bill.
quote:
I did
where can one read this bill?
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News