re: Biden judge blocks Trump administration from ending protections for Haitians

quote:

---

What definition of "lawfare" are you using and what specifics of this decision apply to that chosen definition?

---

you're a cartoon

quote:

---

you're a cartoon

---

The non answer is noted

Your non-answer is also noted

You don't even understand the conversation being had

Here is the, "I just destroyed you in our argument and won the thread" part.

quote:

---

You don't even understand the conversation being had

---

Nope. You whiffed again

You didn't make an argument yet. You avoided answering the question

quote:

---

Nope. You whiffed again

You didn't make an argument yet. You avoided answering the question

---

All of your points are irrelevant to the subject at hand.

quote:

---

what specifics of this decision apply to that chosen definition?

---

Probably this. As a lawyer, I was not aware that judges can pre-determine a court case based on a clearly biased judges opinions based on zero facts nor being capable of determining intent.

quote:

---

Reyes said in an accompanying 83-page opinion that plaintiffs were likely to prevail on the merits of the case, and that she found it “substantially likely” that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem preordained her termination decision because of “hostility to nonwhite immigrants.

---

Are you really saying this isn’t lawfare? You are one fat kid shy of a truffle shuffle.

quote:

---

Are you really saying this isn’t lawfare?

---

No. That's a framed snippet from an 83-page opinion.

I'd wager, without reading anything in the ruling yet, the substantive argument was different and much more in depth.

quote:

---

No. That's a framed snippet from an 83-page opinion.

I'd wager, without reading anything in the ruling yet, the substantive argument was different and much more in depth.

---