- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Biden admin discuss giving nukes to Ukraine
Posted on 11/25/24 at 10:06 am to clamdip
Posted on 11/25/24 at 10:06 am to clamdip
quote:
I am beginning to think there definitely is some kind of globalist undercurrent by powerful groups who want to control not just their country but the world. Soros and Gates are in that group, imo
Beginning to think???? Without a doubt there is. They meet annually in Davos Switzerland.
0
Posted on 11/25/24 at 10:13 am to llfshoals
quote:That's acting like a cornered animal.
Biden is really that stupid.
Posted on 11/25/24 at 10:18 am to Diamondawg
quote:Fair description of the political animals fearing what happens to their positions in a Trump administration.
That's acting like a cornered animal.
Posted on 11/25/24 at 10:20 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Nukes are the ultimate escalation.
Posted on 11/25/24 at 10:26 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Pakistan has nuclear weapons, which is why they havent been taken over by India.
Uh, the last thing India would want is to have Pakistan as part of India. The great partition of Pakistan and India was meant to separate Muslims (Pakistan) from Hindus/Sikh (India). Ten million people still had to cross the borders to get on the "right" side and 100s of thousands were killed or raped.
Nah I dont think either wants to occupy the other.
Posted on 11/25/24 at 10:37 am to The Maj
quote:
eh, the "give them up with the promise of the US having their back"... I agree...
Nothing has kept the peace more than nukes.
Posted on 11/25/24 at 10:38 am to ksayetiger
quote:
Good point. We should give nukes to every country so no war will ever be fought.
Go for it.
Do you think owning a firearm is a deterrent?
Posted on 11/25/24 at 10:38 am to hawgfaninc
Let them keep floating this idea out there, and Russia may be the one to give them nukes. But the Ukraine simps might not like the delivery method 
Posted on 11/25/24 at 10:38 am to Cuz413
quote:
Are you ok with Cuba having them?
Its none of our fricking business if Cuba develops nukes.
Posted on 11/25/24 at 10:39 am to TigerAxeOK
quote:
Nukes are the ultimate escalation.
Sounds like the Democrat argument that firearms commit crimes.
Posted on 11/25/24 at 10:40 am to RogerTheShrubber
Idiot!!! I mean you’re downright stupid!! Stop posting here Potato Joe.
Posted on 11/25/24 at 10:41 am to First Sergeant1
quote:
Back to top
Idiot!!! I mean you’re downright stupid!!
Do firearms protect you or cause crime?
Posted on 11/25/24 at 10:58 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Nukes are the ultimate deterrent.
I bet Ukraine regrets giving theirs up.Ukraine should have never trusted the weak and feckless West. It is also why Little Rocketman or Iran will never part with never part with theirs.
Posted on 11/25/24 at 11:01 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Nothing has kept the peace more than nukes.
Yes, nukes have done more to keep peace than any other technology, they've created a boundary of play where stepping outside of that leads to mutual self destruction.
Which is precisely why you don't hand them over to Ukraine. Lol at suggesting otherwise. Title reads like a fricking Onion headline.
Posted on 11/25/24 at 11:01 am to trinidadtiger
quote:
Nah I dont think either wants to occupy the other.
Probably not, but they both want Kashmir. I assume though they both want, it is not important enough to nuke each other over.
Posted on 11/25/24 at 11:02 am to 14&Counting
quote:
I bet Ukraine regrets giving theirs up
Exactly. If Ukraine still had nukes, Russia would never have invaded.
Posted on 11/25/24 at 11:03 am to Seeing Grey
quote:
Which is precisely why you don't hand them over to Ukraine.
If Ukraine had Nukes, Russia would not be there.
Do you want guns banned in the hood?
Posted on 11/25/24 at 11:05 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
If Ukraine had Nukes, Russia would not be there.
Russia knows NATO has nukes, and they're still there.
Since you're all about analogies. I assume you're fine with handing a UFC fighter a gun while they're being pummelled in the 5th round of a fight and expect them not to use it?
Posted on 11/25/24 at 11:06 am to Seeing Grey
quote:
Russia knows NATO has nukes, and they're still there.
Ukraine is not NATO.
Russia wouldnt attack a NATO member, do you want to know why?
This post was edited on 11/25/24 at 11:07 am
Posted on 11/25/24 at 11:08 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Nothing has kept the peace more than nukes.
Eh, given the chance of proliferation from a cash strapped Ukraine, you really do not have a clue how far the horse would have gotten out of the barn if they had not given them up...
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News