Started By
Message

re: Ben Shapiro takes the gloves off with Candace

Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:24 pm to
Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
4839 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

Candace is a cancer to all things right


Based on what exactly?

Anyone?
Posted by cajuntiger1010
Member since Jan 2015
14439 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

Based on what exactly? Anyone?


Do you live under a rock?
Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
4839 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:40 pm to
You claim Candice Owens is a "cancer".

I challenge your assertion. Can you clarify on the specifics? Seriously. It's a simple request.

If you can't answer it, I understand.

Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
4839 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

The well-established existing right wing philosophies are doing nothing to stop the left.

What has been conserved?


Nada.

This bogus two-team system and their soaring empty rhetoric every 4 years has been designed to slowly boil the crabs until we...er...they stop moving. We are just about fully cooked. Yet the Party-people think our theatrical elections are real.

quote:

Neoconservatism. Libertarianism. Constitutionalism. What exactly would you recommend in place of reaction?


Well, maybe a hybrid Libertarianism-Consitutionalism -- with a proper balance of Republican Representation and Christian ethics & morality.

We are ruled over, NOT "governed" by a malevolent system of pyramid-luciferian worshiping psychopaths.

Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128779 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

I challenge your assertion. Can you clarify on the specifics? Seriously. It's a simple request.


A pernicious, spreading evil.

She shared dumb conspiracy theories that have completely destroyed where the focus should be with Kirk’s murder - the violent trans left.

Her dumb ideas spread to others on the right who are easily suckered - like you and a bunch of other dummies on this board.

So, she’s easily fitting the definition of a cancer.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128779 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

Anything of "hers" that I am regurgitating comes from others that are or might be referencing her stuff.


Right. Thus the cancer appellation.
Posted by Contra
Member since Oct 2016
9568 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 8:07 pm to
Candace Owens is a moron. I can't believe she still has fans. She went off the deep end a while ago.
Posted by LittleJerrySeinfield
350,000 Post Karma
Member since Aug 2013
11301 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 8:11 pm to
Never shot a .30-06 I take it.
Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
4839 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

She shared dumb conspiracy theories that have completely destroyed where the focus should be with Kirk’s murder - the violent trans left.


First, thanks for answering the bell.

I have examined many breakdowns, analyses, actual evidence and theories across the great big internet of things on the Kirk incident. NONE of it (0.0) is as portrayed and represented. That's right. 0.0.

quote:

Her dumb ideas spread to others on the right who are easily suckered - like you and a bunch of other dummies on this board.


Because she and the rest of us dared to NOT accept the "official narrative"?

Candice is privy to the same analyses and evidence many saw, but can't air them out in public. She's hoping people connect dots. Of course ignorant folks like you (with all due respect) naturally believe she's "pernicious" and "spreading evil", spreading "dumb lies". And the rest of us are "dummies".

You guys are content residing in Plato's Cave.

The real "cancer" is the ongoing deception, lies, mass mind-wiping, brainwashing and cy-op theater run by the elites upon the lazy, un-engaged serf-class day in and day out. They don't know what's real anymore so they rely on Big Brother to tell them what and how to think.





Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128779 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

Candice is privy to the same analyses and evidence many saw, but can't air them out in public. She's hoping people connect dots.


This is some wild justification with zero backing facts.

quote:

You guys are content residing in Plato's Cave.


You should stop trying to dip into the world of philosophy. You constantly embarrass yourself.
Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
4839 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

Never shot a .30-06 I take it.


I guess they relied immediately on initial "expert" testimony from FNC, CNN, Nancy Grace -- who knows. We all know that round would have created a huge splattered mess at the scene. Yet it remained neat as a pin.

The there was the autopsy doctor's theory (the round hit the bone, ricocheting internally -- no exit wound), and other ridiculous bogus "expert explanations".

This ballistics snafu was one of several impossibilities explained away and swept under the rug as you well know.

CO's "sin" was in never playing along with the nonsense.
Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
4839 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 8:28 pm to
Truth is out there. You either fear it or it would rock your world.

Plato's Cave. You CAN leave it you know...

Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128779 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

Never shot a .30-06 I take it.


Here’s where dumbass conspiracy theorists show their arse.

Is there any possibility the bullet that killed Charlie was a .30-06?

All those words mean something, so if you want to answer please try to follow exactly the question I asked and answer it.
Posted by LittleJerrySeinfield
350,000 Post Karma
Member since Aug 2013
11301 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 8:30 pm to
No possibility. A .30-06 would have taken his head off. Especially from that range.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128779 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

Truth is out there.


I don’t fear truth. This lack of fear keeps me from swallowing asinine theories (usually).

quote:

Plato's Cave. You CAN leave it you know.


You are in a cave, perceiving conspiracy theories as truth.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128779 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

No possibility.


Right. Conspiracy theorists speak in absolutes even when they don’t exist. Thanks for confirming.
Posted by YoSoyDeleeshus
Texas
Member since Sep 2014
490 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 8:35 pm to
who gives a damn what a zionist shill thinks? Wake up dude, Israel is not your friend.
Posted by LittleJerrySeinfield
350,000 Post Karma
Member since Aug 2013
11301 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 8:39 pm to
If you haven’t been keeping score the last few years, “conspiracy theorists” have been racking up the W’s.

Here’s an absolute….You’re absolutely a moron if you swallow the official story.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128779 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 9:53 pm to
You aren’t able to distinguish between theories you should question and everything else because “have you seen how many conspiracy theories are right?”

There’s a sliver of light that’s penetrated the fraud. Let it shine on through.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13480 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

I have examined...across the great big internet


Well, if it was on the internet, it has to be true, right? There's certainly not a bunch of people making money off traffic to their blogs/sites putting up clickbait for suckers like yourself. That can't be the case.

Why don't you wait for the trial, when the other 95% of the evidence they have that is not known to the public will be made known?

quote:

Because she and the rest of us dared to NOT accept the "official narrative"?


No, because you are retarded and don't know the definition of the word "evidence." Some grifter like Owens says, "Well, who benefitted from Charlie Kirk's death," and you think that's "evidence." When someone shows you why some idiot theory or other can't be true (like Owen's ridiculous "Egyptian plane theory"), you claim that it proves that they theory is correct because the refutation is part of the conspiracy.

The "official narrative" hasn't even been given yet, you moron. You won't know what the "official narrative" is until the trial, like I said above.

At this point Candace has claimed that Kirk was killed by 1.The Joos (of course) 2. The Trump administration. 3. Erika Kirk

And that's just three that I know about. I guarantee there are plenty more that I don't know about, as I try my best to ignore that crazy bitch.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram