- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/22/26 at 1:57 pm to Red Stick Tigress
Here is an image of what an autopsy table headrest looks like
Hmmmmmm
quote:
Chump said that 2nd autopsy showed a 12" x 8" red mark in soft tissue by occipital bone (back of head.)
Hmmmmmm
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:03 pm to Vacherie Saint
Makes sense.
I haven't had an autopsy yet and probably wouldn't live to tell about it.

I haven't had an autopsy yet and probably wouldn't live to tell about it.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:20 pm to Red Stick Tigress
quote:
Chump said that 2nd autopsy showed a 12" x 8" red mark in soft tissue by occipital bone (back of head.)
Just how big was this kids head?
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:46 pm to Vacherie Saint
2.54 cm in an inch. So 6.22 inch by 4.72 inches
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:49 pm to Diamondawg
think pressure points my guy. his neck isnt 12 inches wide, nor 8 inches long. He would have certainly been repositioned and moved throughout the autopsy.
Or, it could have been something as benign as sunburn, which you would expect in these conditions.
But if it were hemorrhaging, ie an accumulation of blood due to trauma, you would have 700% heard this from Crump
Or, it could have been something as benign as sunburn, which you would expect in these conditions.
But if it were hemorrhaging, ie an accumulation of blood due to trauma, you would have 700% heard this from Crump
This post was edited on 7/22/26 at 2:52 pm
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:54 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
Just how big was this kids head?
Yea, he wasn't Somalian.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:55 pm to mtntiger
quote:
I think he is going to sue the State of Mississippi and Jackson County for dereliction of duty. Hell, he came pretty close to sayiing it outright.
For which he will most definitely lose. The state nor the locality had a single thing to do about it and he cannot prove a flawed autopsy. Every single Jackson County, MS resident should be screaming for them to not dare settle.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 3:04 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:So if typical of an autopsy the pathologist would have said "bruising consistent with head rest on autopsy table".
think pressure points my guy. his neck isnt 12 inches wide, nor 8 inches long.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 3:06 pm to bamadontcare
quote:
Why doesn’t the medical examiner announce it?
Because it's THEIR Medical Examiner.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 4:07 pm to Diamondawg
no. if the "redness" were indeed bruising, it would have been described as a hemorrhage, which could be attributed to trauma or injury. Crump would have made sure to be clear about this.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 4:36 pm to Vacherie Saint
One thing the report did not state is if the redness was pre- or post-morte.. You would think he would have point this out.
My two possibilities are this:
1. Pre-mortem irritation caused by a football helmet. The diagram shown in the report lines up with padding in the back of a helmet. If he's been working out with a helmet on, that could explain it.
2. Post-mortem bruising caused by the hull of a boat. If his body was just below the surface, a boat could have hit him and no one on board would have noticed. The Gulf isn't known for it’s crystal clear north of the islands. The boat may not have been going very fast due to rough/shallow water.
Just a couple things to ponder.
My two possibilities are this:
1. Pre-mortem irritation caused by a football helmet. The diagram shown in the report lines up with padding in the back of a helmet. If he's been working out with a helmet on, that could explain it.
2. Post-mortem bruising caused by the hull of a boat. If his body was just below the surface, a boat could have hit him and no one on board would have noticed. The Gulf isn't known for it’s crystal clear north of the islands. The boat may not have been going very fast due to rough/shallow water.
Just a couple things to ponder.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 4:55 pm to mtntiger
I think you can rule out #2 because bruising/trauma would have certainly been reported. And getting a fatal hit to the head from a boat would have almost certainly caused fractures- which are not there. #1 tracks since his father said he was preparing for a football tryout.
The TMZ theory about the autopsy head rest may be the most likely, and sun irritation is another very likely cause.
The TMZ theory about the autopsy head rest may be the most likely, and sun irritation is another very likely cause.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 5:00 pm to mtntiger
quote:
Nolan died from drowning. There is no evidence of foul play.
The Gulf of Mexico was not racist. The Gulf of America, on the other hand…
Posted on 7/22/26 at 5:09 pm to mtntiger
"I think he is going to sue the State of Mississippi and Jackson County"
Good luck with that.
Good luck with that.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 5:11 pm to Hailstate2014
Blacks deserve reparations for not being able to swim
Obviously if there was foul play, I hope the parties involved are brought to justice.
Obviously if there was foul play, I hope the parties involved are brought to justice.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 5:25 pm to Jauquismos
I will say this... shame on the parents for getting involved with Sharpton and Crump.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 5:50 pm to hogcard1964
quote:You've said enough.
I will say this.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 6:04 pm to OysterPoBoy
quote:
Lack of evidence points to premeditation
So if I walk in to my home tonight and I see no evidence of a break in… I can assume there HAS been a break in, but it was planned so well that there is no evidence of a break in and likely the cops were in on it?
IMHO, lack of evidence= no crime
Popular
Back to top


0





