- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Before and after aerial pics of the Beirut port.
Posted on 8/6/20 at 12:17 pm to captainFid
Posted on 8/6/20 at 12:17 pm to captainFid
quote:
Incredible images in this thread. The video was impressive but I can see why many thought it was intentional with so much energy released.
TBH, my first thought on seeing it was due to the size that it was industrial, not military. No conventional arms explode with that much force other than nukes or FAE, and it was clearly neither of those.
It pissed me off when I heard Trump call it attack.
1
Posted on 8/6/20 at 12:20 pm to philter
quote:
I dont think that's a ship, those are cranes to offload crates from ship. He's on top of a concrete roof or partition, facing the side of the building on fire.
There are only a couple of buildings that it could be (west of wh), as there are no concrete buildings on the east side of the warehouse.
He on the roof of the building that was connected to the grain silos before the big explosion.
Posted on 8/6/20 at 12:39 pm to Grimhorn
quote:
May be Photoshopped... See the 8 second mark and a different angle at 28 sec.
Update- it is fake as hell:
quote:
Mad Liberals (Parler: MadLiberals)
@mad_liberals
Level 1:
There is a fake video out that there was a missile involved in the #Beirut explosion. The person who edited the video didn't even take the time to motion blur the missile.
quote:
I mean, why even invert the colors? Would have been clear in the original color.
Posted on 8/6/20 at 12:44 pm to PhDoogan
Posted on 8/6/20 at 1:02 pm to lz2112
quote:
TBH, my first thought on seeing it was due to the size that it was industrial, not military. No conventional arms explode with that much force other than nukes or FAE, and it was clearly neither of those.
It pissed me off when I heard Trump call it attack.
Don't we (or the former Soviets) have something called a moab. That's what I was reminded of.
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News