re: Ban-testing poll thread: How many here reading the Q thread?

I was politely asked to stay out of the Q thread. I guess it's a big website traffic cow for them. Plus, I don;t think they liked me pointing out that the whole thing is just a ploy for Trump to get evangelicals to support him, despite his being a philandering, casino-owning media whore who has appeared in soft core pornos.

I support Trump. I think we need 4 more years, and I think it's fricking genius.

Lubricated Butthole is Hope Hicks, for all we know.

Maybe Q was telling us to keep an eye on you.

If you are in the know, can you explain to me how Pizzagate is fake?

Did Podesta or any of the others deny they sent those Emails? That they are fabrications?

Basically all that has happened (so far) is that Alefantis got trotted in front of the camera once to say "All this stuff is not true." And that was that.

Even the shooting incident is ludicrous if you look into it. (And it has been looked into)

OIG Report
FISA declas
Military Parade with Perp Walks


I could go on and on about failed happenings. Some of which are about or more than a year old now.

But whatever. I stopped reading the thread because no matter how many time you pointed out how blatantly wrong they were they found another excuse.

So, for our resident skeptics, riddle me this:

Former FBI General Counsel James Baker testifies in front of House Judiciary Committee in a closed door hearing on Oct. 17-18, 2018. Transcripts are not published.

Dec. 12, 2018 - Q posts this:



Jan. 15, 2019 - Jim Jordan and Mark Meadows send the following Letter to US Atty John Durham in response to Durham's name coming up in the closed door testimony.

Apr. 9, 2019 - Rep. Doug Collins releases Baker testimony transcript from October 18.

May 15, 2019 - AG Barr Appoints John Durham to Investigate Origins of Russia Investigation

The earliest point we see Durham's name mentioned is the Meadows/Jordan letter.

How did Q know, if he's just some fat troll in his mom's basement, covered in a fine layer of Cheeto dust?

It's worth noting that while the news came out yesterday about Barr "appointing" Durham to investigate/prosecute the Russia investigation, you do catch the fact that Durham's name came up in Congress in the context of an ongoing investigation during the past October, over 4 months before Barr was confirmed by the Senate, yes?

Comey is a POS and he is a fricking weirdo with weird tweets that could easily be instructing others on not coming clean of their sick coup attempt against Trump.

Look at the replies to me in this thread from the diehard Q person. Q told them to watch me. That garbage isn't even funny. One should not become unhinged or think I or someone like me is the bad guy because I think Q is rubbish. Take the declassification, it was suppose to be the boom, (the on going slow leaks are of unclassified stuff) then the OIG report. Every Q post was the boom, it is repeat and rinse, but many here got caught up in the bread making & they lived on 8chan and lost any sense.

It is justice all but the MSM, GOPe, dems want. I simply don't need to read Q or bake bread on 8chan to hope justice prevails. Sadly, I think it will be brushed under the rug; all for the sake of the corrupted govt. institutions.

It is enough to be maybe someone being in the know but they may not be the good guys. They are just making crap up as they go along.

quote:

---

Q told them to watch me. That garbage isn't even funny.

---

Jesus Christ, it was a joke. Are you such a bitter harridan that you've lost all touch with any semblance of humor?

quote:

---

There's at least half a dozen false premises that are baked into your post, not the least of which is that everything that is going to happen with respect to the things Q has posted about has already happened, and it's all over.

---

List em off big cat. All 6 of them or more. And that’s after you correctly interpret the fact that I say that the lack of p walks and Declas
Are something out of your control. Meaning: the schedule, though not to anyone’s preference is what is not helping the q thread’s cred.


Nowhere do I say that you have anything to do with expediting happenings. It’s just that currency that everyone deals in, outside the q thread, is action. Just talk as of now. Talk won’t get you anywhere if 412000 illeagals vote in Texas. All of the happenings are disappearing if trump loses 2020.


Here’s the quote in full.

quote:

---

But really, The lack of p walks and declas is that threads main issue for which they cannot help.

---

quote:

---

One should not become unhinged or think I or someone like me is the bad guy because I think Q is rubbish

---

I don't think you're a bad guy. To the contrary, I think we're both headed in the same direction as far as where we think all of the evidence leads with respect to SpyGate and the rest of the DS entrenchment in our government. The thing that differs between us is that you're trying your best to do the math the long way and show your work by tiptoeing around the information provided by Q, while the rest of us are using calculators. You were all in to a point, and now you're not. Why that is is up to you to reconcile, but I'm putting my money on sour grapes.

quote:

---

ake the declassification, it was suppose to be the boom,

---

You do understand that the FISA DECLAS order was signed by Trump back in September of last year, right? It's done. It's in the hands of the AG/OIG to release, now.

quote:

---

Every Q post was the boom, it is repeat and rinse,

---

There's a learning curve to understanding what's going on with respect to timing. It's been one of the hardest facets to understand, but when you get it, you're less susceptible to freaking out to any one drop, because every drop has its time and place, and rarely if ever is it time-sensitive to when it is posted.

1/2 Bonus point for the bread references, I suppose. It smacks of "How do you do, fellow kids," though. Maybe you're doing Atkins and just miss carbs, or you were recently diagnosed as Celiac. Not my monkey, not my circus.