re: AZ Sen. Election Committee Reveals Almost Half the Ballots Ran Through Maricopa Failed

quote:

---

This is how we get worn down. The evidence is there and there are no consequences for the perpetrators. It's like they actually want us to see how we are getting fricked by the system so we will eventually lose hope.

---

The blatant lack of accountability and punishment for political lawbreakers is definitely taking a spiritual and mental toll on Americans who use to believe the US was mostly a righteous and just nation.....this nation is drowning in corruption and immorality.

Feature not an error

quote:

---

BS.....it just pisses me off the Dims/Groomers have figured out how to rig elections through mass mail in ballot harvesting and the Rs have yet to figure out any effective strategy to pushback on this crap!

---

if the greatest thinkers of Republicans cannot figure it out maybe its not really happening as advertised.

its either propaganda or its real. if its real and legal in your state, do it.
its legal in some states.

quote:

---

Arizona Senate Election Committee Reveals Almost Half the Ballots Ran Through Maricopa County Tabulators Failed

---

That's not what was testified to, and what was testified might raise some questions but it answered none.

What was testified to was some population of ballots, which they didn't really identify, received a "ballot insertion error" almost half the time. The professor from A&M made it clear that these ballots should not be directly correlated to single voters/votes. He explained that voters scanned their own ballots and there are 4 different ways to insert them - right side up/top first, right side up/bottom first, etc - and there wasn't directions for voters to follow. So a voter might have scanned his ballot 2, 3, 4 times before he didn't get the "ballot insertion error" message.

He also explained overvotes would result in multiple scans of the same ballot - presumably after the voter cures his own ballot.

So I'm not sure why this group is associating this information with the acceptable tabulator error rate of 1-in-500, given voter error does not equal tabulator error.

I didn't hear anything that moved the needle re: tabulator issues, and more importantly - voter disenfranchisement due to unreasonably long lines.

The professor's testimony on signature verification was more interesting, and as I've argued in these threads - signature verification and (to a lesser extent) chain of custody are where fraud could be found if someone wanted to look for it.

Abe Hamadeh is the one with a legit 2022 election bitch. There's a decent chance he won his race.