- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

AZ Audit Update: Dr Shiva Speaks up
Posted on 2/19/22 at 1:18 am
Posted on 2/19/22 at 1:18 am
Tucson Sentinel
I atleast partially agree with him at this point. if only he'd come around on chain of custody an signature verification as not proof of fraud but potentially areas we could improve i'd be in agreement with him.
quote:
Millions of dollars were spent focused on the paper ballot counting (which revealed the numbers were the same) while self-serving grifters raised money for themselves and misdirected attention from real issues such as Chain of Custody and Signature Verification,” Ayyadurai wrote.
I atleast partially agree with him at this point. if only he'd come around on chain of custody an signature verification as not proof of fraud but potentially areas we could improve i'd be in agreement with him.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 1:26 am to oklahogjr
quote:
we could improve i'd be in agreement with him.
Improve on what?
Posted on 2/19/22 at 1:29 am to oklahogjr
So the fraud factor is intent. And they absolutely had that. Which is why it’s fraud.
And with mail in you have mail fraud. A federal crime.
And if you want to argue that there was no intent, it’s gross negligence. Which would get any professional fricking fired. And our elections aren’t safe and secure and anyone spouting that is ignorant or in on it.
And with mail in you have mail fraud. A federal crime.
And if you want to argue that there was no intent, it’s gross negligence. Which would get any professional fricking fired. And our elections aren’t safe and secure and anyone spouting that is ignorant or in on it.
This post was edited on 2/19/22 at 1:36 am
Posted on 2/19/22 at 1:32 am to oklahogjr
God you are stupid. Simple recounts aren’t sufficient. You can have fake ballots, fake paper, illegal voters, etc. it has been well established that there was major fraud in Arizona. Almost 60k fraudulent ballots in one county. Then they broke ever rule in the book to cover it up and got caught
Posted on 2/19/22 at 1:40 am to oklahogjr
I can’t help but think that a primary point (or perhaps “the”)of the OP is to ring the popular “grifter” bell. Which if I’m leveling serious charges of grifting off of such a high profile situation as this, I’d probably come with just a tad more context and tad more supporting info than the vague allegation cited in the article.
As it stands, that strikes me more as innuendo and smear, and demonstrates personal bias against the auditors. Which in turn indicates a lack of credible objection. Talking about the interviewee in the article, that is.
As it stands, that strikes me more as innuendo and smear, and demonstrates personal bias against the auditors. Which in turn indicates a lack of credible objection. Talking about the interviewee in the article, that is.
This post was edited on 2/19/22 at 1:42 am
Posted on 2/19/22 at 5:06 am to oklahogjr
You cannot even prove any of your 50 votes were counted in November 2020.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 5:35 am to oklahogjr
We all really need your agreement with him. It’s very important to us.
Popular
Back to top
6





