Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

AZ Audit Update: Dr Shiva Speaks up

Posted on 2/19/22 at 1:18 am
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
40237 posts
Posted on 2/19/22 at 1:18 am
Tucson Sentinel

quote:

Millions of dollars were spent focused on the paper ballot counting (which revealed the numbers were the same) while self-serving grifters raised money for themselves and misdirected attention from real issues such as Chain of Custody and Signature Verification,” Ayyadurai wrote.


I atleast partially agree with him at this point. if only he'd come around on chain of custody an signature verification as not proof of fraud but potentially areas we could improve i'd be in agreement with him.
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22653 posts
Posted on 2/19/22 at 1:26 am to
quote:

we could improve i'd be in agreement with him.

Improve on what?
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89511 posts
Posted on 2/19/22 at 1:29 am to
So the fraud factor is intent. And they absolutely had that. Which is why it’s fraud.

And with mail in you have mail fraud. A federal crime.

And if you want to argue that there was no intent, it’s gross negligence. Which would get any professional fricking fired. And our elections aren’t safe and secure and anyone spouting that is ignorant or in on it.
This post was edited on 2/19/22 at 1:36 am
Posted by xxTIMMYxx
Member since Aug 2019
17562 posts
Posted on 2/19/22 at 1:32 am to
God you are stupid. Simple recounts aren’t sufficient. You can have fake ballots, fake paper, illegal voters, etc. it has been well established that there was major fraud in Arizona. Almost 60k fraudulent ballots in one county. Then they broke ever rule in the book to cover it up and got caught
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36474 posts
Posted on 2/19/22 at 1:40 am to
I can’t help but think that a primary point (or perhaps “the”)of the OP is to ring the popular “grifter” bell. Which if I’m leveling serious charges of grifting off of such a high profile situation as this, I’d probably come with just a tad more context and tad more supporting info than the vague allegation cited in the article.

As it stands, that strikes me more as innuendo and smear, and demonstrates personal bias against the auditors. Which in turn indicates a lack of credible objection. Talking about the interviewee in the article, that is.
This post was edited on 2/19/22 at 1:42 am
Posted by Bulldogblitz
In my house
Member since Dec 2018
28161 posts
Posted on 2/19/22 at 5:06 am to
You cannot even prove any of your 50 votes were counted in November 2020.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
157481 posts
Posted on 2/19/22 at 5:35 am to
We all really need your agreement with him. It’s very important to us.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram