Posted by
Message
skeeter531
Member since Jun 2014
1391 posts

Army will not investigate Vindman
Unbelievable. Well not really. Swampers gonna swamp.

LINK


HailToTheChiz
Auburn Fan
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
33882 posts

re: Army will not investigate Vindman
Country is lost


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
457
HailHailtoMichigan!
LSU Fan
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
57781 posts
 Online 

re: Army will not investigate Vindman
Who cares? He lost the impeachment battle and is old news


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
250
boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
66935 posts
 Online 

re: Army will not investigate Vindman
he absolutely demanded the prid quo pro. I’m not sure that’s really in debate. It wasn’t impeachable but that doesn’t mean Vindman should not have reported it


skeeter531
Member since Jun 2014
1391 posts

re: Army will not investigate Vindman
he went outside the chain of command.


MsHoghunter
Member since Oct 2017
493 posts

re: Army will not investigate Vindman
Are they going to award him another purple hart


cajunangelle
Navy Fan
eating a fried oyster/shrimp poboy
Member since Oct 2012
96844 posts
 Online 

re: Army will not investigate Vindman
Wow. At the very least insubordination. WTF did Obama do to the Pentagon to wussify things so politically correct. Other than fire a lot and put in yes men hacks.


boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
66935 posts
 Online 

re: Army will not investigate Vindman
Ok, what’s the penalty for that?


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
134
MrLarson
Auburn Fan
Member since Oct 2014
31095 posts

re: Army will not investigate Vindman
Call in the dogs and piss on the fire, shut down the Q thread while were at it. Not a single person on the left is going to have to pay for this shite.



Magician2
SMU Fan
Grand Coteau
Member since Oct 2015
5683 posts
 Online 

re: Army will not investigate Vindman
Boosiebadazz loves big authoritarian government. Kneels and prays at the almighty dc beltway alter.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
293
TD SponsorTD Fan
USA
Member since 2001
Thank you for supporting our sponsors
Advertisement
CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
45962 posts
 Online 

re: Army will not investigate Vindman
Don’t want to piss off the Secretary of Defense in Ukraine , or whatever they call Vindman over there....
This post was edited on 2/14 at 3:53 pm


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
121
jnethe1
LSU Fan
Youngsville
Member since Dec 2012
9233 posts

re: Army will not investigate Vindman
We need a reset at this point. Accountability is lost.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
252
MsHoghunter
Member since Oct 2017
493 posts

re: Army will not investigate Vindman
quote:

he absolutely demanded the prid quo pro. I’m not sure that’s really in debate. It wasn’t impeachable but that doesn’t mean Vindman should not have reported it


Except it's not in the transcript


BuckyCheese
Wisconsin Fan
Member since Jan 2015
10370 posts

re: Army will not investigate Vindman
At this point they have to be trolling Trump in an attempt to get him to melt down.


texashorn
Texas Fan
Member since May 2008
10936 posts

re: Army will not investigate Vindman
So much winning!


SSpaniel
Memphis Fan
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
21654 posts
 Online 

re: Army will not investigate Vindman
quote:

he absolutely demanded the prid quo pro.


Except that he didn't.


George Dickel
Army Fan
Member since Jun 2019
238 posts

re: Army will not investigate Vindman
POTUS needs to purge the military of all Obama holdovers. Have a RIF or just reassign them to The North Pole for Ice research.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
135
Snazzmeister
Georgia Fan
IHTFP
Member since Jan 2015
516 posts

re: Army will not investigate Vindman
quote:

So much winning!


Didn’t take long to abandon your “reasonable conservative” Schlick.


Janky
LSU Fan
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
30615 posts
 Online 

re: Army will not investigate Vindman
I would imagine insubordination is kinda a big deal in the army.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
132
boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
66935 posts
 Online 

re: Army will not investigate Vindman
Was it a certified, verbatim transcript or a third party summarization of the call?

Which tenses and nouns were used?


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5next pagelast page

Back to top

logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram