- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Apparently, stocks only lose value and never regain or exceed declines.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 5:44 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 4/6/25 at 5:44 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Cuckler math!
0
Posted on 4/6/25 at 5:46 pm to Corinthians420
At least use an honest graph.
The market was sub 20,000 under Obama.
The day we hit 20,000 was a milestone I never thought I’d see in 2009. That milestone was courtesy of President Donald J. Trump.
The market was sub 20,000 under Obama.
The day we hit 20,000 was a milestone I never thought I’d see in 2009. That milestone was courtesy of President Donald J. Trump.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 5:46 pm to Riverside
quote:
The last 7 years have spoiled people. Those of us who lived through Obama know what it’s like to see red.
This.
And i argue if kamala was elected the marlet would be in a continuous downard spiral.
Only reason stocks went up the last 4 years is inflation was so dn high.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 5:47 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You lost 15, gained 25. That puts you 15 behind where you potentially could have been
I'm I'm sorry but taking it as it's written this maybe the stupidest thing ever written about the stock market in the history of things written about the stock market. Are you under the impression that because it went up 25 it was going to go up 25 anyways even if it hadn't Fallen back 15? Like that's some sort of fricking stock market rule or something? Are you fricking retarded
This post was edited on 4/6/25 at 5:48 pm
Posted on 4/6/25 at 5:48 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Are you back on the bottle 
Posted on 4/6/25 at 5:48 pm to udtiger
quote:
This whole argument is contingent on the flawed premise that stocks only go up.
No kidding.
We're talking about this unforced error that is dropping the market, recovery to potential will take much longer now.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 5:49 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
that because it went up 25 it was going to go up 25 anyways
Potentially, absolutely.
If it hadnt gone to 60, it certianly would have sold higher than 80 in that time frame if the market were healthy
Posted on 4/6/25 at 5:49 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Potentially, absolutely
Oh
My
God
You're serious
Wow
Posted on 4/6/25 at 5:51 pm to Bonkers119
quote:
Imagine all the 65+ year olds that were about to retire.
if they let a two day decline ruin their retirement then they weren't ready to retire period. Boomers have had the best of everything including the longest bull market during their peak earning years. They need to pull themselves up by the bootstraps and cut their frivolous spending on Becky's Botox and cut out your golf and dinner at Sullivan's.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 5:51 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
Back to top
quote:
Potentially, absolutely
Oh
My
God
Absolutely.
How much you earning while your portfolio is falling?
Posted on 4/6/25 at 5:52 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You could have sold higher than 80 had the market not fallen You lost 15, gained 25. That puts you 15 behind where you potentially could have been
holy shite This belongs in the TD hall of fame, right next to “the faster you go, the higher your miles/gallon”
Posted on 4/6/25 at 5:55 pm to Logician
quote:
This belongs in the TD hall of fame
I agree. Youre not making money when your 401k porfolio is in the red when its an unforced error.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 5:56 pm to Riverside
quote:
At least use an honest graph.
lol you really said this in the same post that you posted a graph that excludes 3/4ths of Obamas term?
Posted on 4/6/25 at 6:00 pm to Bonkers119
quote:
Imagine all the 65+ year olds that were about to retire. They just lost 10-12% of their retirement in 3 months.
No, they didn't, and if they did, they are doing it wrong. They probably were flat or maybe even up a little.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 6:00 pm to Corinthians420
The rest of his term was even worse. The shite economy in 2016 is the reason Hillary lost.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 6:01 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Absolutely.
How much you earning while your portfolio is falling?
Dude. Stop it. You're. Embarrassing yourself. This may be the most embarrassing set of posts from somebody I've ever seen on the internet. Take a break and probably stop drinking today
Posted on 4/6/25 at 6:02 pm to Logician
quote:
This belongs in the TD hall of fame, right next to “the faster you go, the higher your miles/gallon”
It's honestly amazing and the stupid frick looks like he's going to quadruple and quintuple down. I mean it's possibly the most embarrassing thing ever written about the stock market
Posted on 4/6/25 at 6:04 pm to Bonkers119
quote:
Imagine all the 65+ year olds that were about to retire. They just lost 10-12% of their retirement in 3 months
If you are 65 years old and your current portfolio asset allocation is such that you experience 100% of the decline or gain in the equities Market you're a fricking idiot
Posted on 4/6/25 at 6:05 pm to Riverside
quote:
The rest of his term was even worse.
the stock market was in the 8,000s when he took office, crashed due to the housing collapse, and was above 20,000 when he left.
if you lost money on it it's because you have paper hands.
and it wasn't due to some great policies or anything like that by Obama, just him not fricking up was good enough to let the economy recover by itself.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 6:15 pm to udtiger
quote:
Also, if you have investments in stocks or other instruments or commodities, you apparently lose money even if you choose not to sell.
That seems to be the takeway from the reporting of the last week (and many concerned posters here).
The markets will never recover from Trump's tariff war, it's over, the Global Reset has begun.
If you don't have some land to grow food, raise some livestock along with the firepower to protect your property and possessions (hopefully you bought all the gold and ammo you could afford) you're in trouble.
I'm mostly joking here^^^, but every American if possible should have some available options if shite truly hits the fan. I don't think Trump's tariff war is the catalyst for the big "shite hitting the fan moment."
Is it possible the global economy could go into a hard recession? Yes, but if a recession occurs I'm confident in the next 12-16 months the US will be the nation leading the global economy out of recession if a recession were to occur.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News