- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Another bs ruling: federal judge rules it is unconstitutional to arrest illegals at court
Posted on 6/23/26 at 6:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/23/26 at 6:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:quote:That's the argument at least.
If I'm reading this right, is it just another instance where they sloppily implemented what is an otherwise legal policy change, failing to document a reason for the change?
I can agree the administration made their own problem here by simply not stating why the change was made (re: APA), but there's also an argument to be made that this falls within the exclusionary area of 5 U.S.C. § 553(b)(B) ( LINK)
quote:
Except when notice or hearing is required by statute, this subsection does not apply-
(A) to interpretative rules, general statements of policy, or rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice; or
(B) when the agency for good cause finds (and incorporates the finding and a brief statement of reasons therefor in the rules issued) that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.
What they are doing is arresting people for being here illegally. My guess is the government is going to argue that posting the policy change would be contrary to the public interest of enforcing immigration policy by alerting those here illegally that they could be arrested at the courthouse.
0
Posted on 6/23/26 at 7:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
Since the Supreme Court already ruled, no.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 8:03 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Man frick those judges, tell them to come physically do something to stop shite themselves
Posted on 6/23/26 at 10:49 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
If I'm reading this right, is it just another instance where they sloppily implemented what is an otherwise legal policy change, failing to document a reason for the change?
So, the federal government can't carry out the law unless they properly document a reason for carrying out the law.
We've reached peak retard.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 5:30 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
DOJ will win on appeal. Meanwhile, Trump will find a workaraound. One of the best builders in the world like him knows how to get shite done.
I’d suggest to DJT that ICE simply revokes the policy, but ICE agents are given general advice to faithfully execute the statute anywhere they can lawfully be present. Not a snowball’s chance in hell ICE agents can be banned from a public courthouse.
Also the class actions rather than universal injunctions games is silly. The black Justice wrote in her dissent that it was a viable alternative.
I’d suggest to DJT that ICE simply revokes the policy, but ICE agents are given general advice to faithfully execute the statute anywhere they can lawfully be present. Not a snowball’s chance in hell ICE agents can be banned from a public courthouse.
Also the class actions rather than universal injunctions games is silly. The black Justice wrote in her dissent that it was a viable alternative.
This post was edited on 6/24/26 at 5:35 am
Posted on 6/24/26 at 6:24 am to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
So, the federal government can't carry out the law unless they properly document a reason for carrying out the law.
We've reached peak retard.
quote:
The U.S. Administrative Procedure Act (APA) was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Harry S. Truman on June 11, 1946.
*ETA: it was created by Congress to rein in leftist abuse of Executive agencies (primarily FDR in the New Deal), which Congress can do since the only reason the Executive has these particular powers is because Congress authorized it.
This post was edited on 6/24/26 at 6:39 am
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News