- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Amendment #2 Vote NO to protect against SJW
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:26 am
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:26 am
I was on a jury once and we convicted this black guy for robbery and assault on a business owner who was walking to his vehicle after closing. The evidence was overwhelming and we came back with a 11/12 verdict. The one standout, a black girl, who no matter what, did not want to convict him. Never presented an argument for why she believes he was innocent. Was firm on her decision. Vote NO, guys.
27
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:31 am to Michael Hayes
This is EXACTLY why I will vote no for this.
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:32 am to Michael Hayes
Voted no. frick SJWs.
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:35 am to Michael Hayes
I love all of you snowflakes feeling like they need to post their own threads for their own special little anecdotes 
Jury would have hung. Could have been retried. It's not the same thing as an acquittal.
Jury would have hung. Could have been retried. It's not the same thing as an acquittal.
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:35 am to TigersSEC2010
voted no, if you need unanimous jury then you're never getting a conviction
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:36 am to hsfolk
quote:
voted no, if you need unanimous jury then you're never getting a conviction
Just as absurdly wrong in this thread as you were in the last one you posted that line
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:39 am to hsfolk
quote:
voted no, if you need unanimous jury then you're never getting a conviction
There are never any convictions in 48 other states and federal courts?
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:43 am to Joshjrn
Expensive and unneeded.
10 out of 12 is enough leeway to ensure justice one way or the other.
10 out of 12 is enough leeway to ensure justice one way or the other.
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:45 am to hsfolk
quote:
voted no, if you need unanimous jury then you're never getting a conviction
I hope you're being sarcastic. Please tell me you are
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:45 am to Michael Hayes
The republicans trying to keep African American voices from being heard just like in the civil war
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:46 am to SLafourche07
The other 48 states don’t have demographics
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:46 am to SLafourche07
Other states don’t have the stupids and the tribal mentality that ours does
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:48 am to Joshjrn
quote:That's what criminal lawyers like yourself rely on, that one SJW that would never convict regardless of the evidence.
Jury would have hung. Could have been retried.
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:48 am to notiger1997
quote:
Other states don’t have the stupids and the tribal mentality that ours does
Yep, places like Alabama and Mississippi are bastions of high brow intellectualism
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:50 am to sec13rowBBseat28
quote:
That's what criminal lawyers like yourself rely on, that one SJW that would never convict regardless of the evidence.
Yeah, no.
I love all the “conservatives” on here who think the government would never try an innocent person. Ever. Inconceivable...
You fricking hypocrites
This post was edited on 11/6/18 at 9:50 am
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:50 am to Michael Hayes
I am as conservative as a person could be. That is why I am voting Yes on this amendment.
Guilt should be beyond a reasonable doubt.
Guilt should be beyond a reasonable doubt.
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:51 am to Michael Hayes
quote:
I was on a jury once and we convicted this black guy for robbery and assault on a business owner who was walking to his vehicle after closing. The evidence was overwhelming and we came back with a 11/12 verdict. The one standout, a black girl, who no matter what, did not want to convict him. Never presented an argument for why she believes he was innocent. Was firm on her decision. Vote NO, guys.
My wife has a similar story, which I have mentioned here before. Was talking about this to my Supv yesterday and he had a similar one as well.
Young black male shot someone, prints on the gun and gun powder on his hands. Jury was 5 black, 7 white and three of the blacks refused to move off their stance of not guilty. Finally one gave in. He then said something that surprised me, the defense attorney came into talk with them after and told them they did the right thing (ie: his client was guilty as hell). Were this change to pass that guy would have been back on the streets with the quickness.
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:54 am to Joshjrn
quote:
I love all the “conservatives” on here who think the government would never try an innocent person. Ever. Inconceivable..
This guy gets it.
"It is better that ten guilty escape than one innocent suffer." -William Blackstone
No, I am not a trial lawyer. I am a freedom loving patriot!
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:55 am to Bard
quote:
Were this change to pass that guy would have been back on the streets with the quickness.
Still no. Hung jury. State gets to retry.
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:56 am to Tommy Callahan
quote:
Guilt should be beyond a reasonable doubt.
You can look at a person and tell they’re guilty
Page 1 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News