re: All You Had To Do Was Critically Investigate 911 And None Of This Would Be Happening

quote:

---

I’m not arguing about what was hit inside the Pentagon.

---

You said if anything besides an airplane was used to destroy the Pentagon the damage would be greater while ignoring the notion that the budget analyst office was the only intended sector of the Pentagon that was intended to be destroyed for the verifiable connection that office had to what was also inside WTC7.

Not here to change the mind of people like yourself. Here to offer 101 level, baby step intro's to people who may become inspired to take their own journey of discovery.

Explain to me what is happening between :33 and :37 seconds in your second link.

Unfortunately the controlled demolition theory is a scam.

It's purposely fueled with some logic and some evidence but ultimately the organization: Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, which promote this theory, is totally fraudulent and led by an operative.

quote:

---

Explain to me what is happening between :33 and :37 seconds in your second link.

---

The cores are falling apart and collapsing while shedding the residual dust that has caked them in the collapse.

quote:

---

You said if anything besides an airplane was used to destroy the Pentagon the damage would be greater while ignoring the notion that the budget analyst office was the only intended sector of the Pentagon that was intended to be destroyed for the verifiable connection that office had to what was also inside WTC7.

---

And yet, still, the damage would be greater if it was a missile and it would probably be more focused too.

You’re arguing a ball peen hammer vs a rubber mallet.

A missile would cause more damage in a smaller area and a plane would cause less damage over a wider area.

I’d sure love to know what kind of missile would be used to cause such damage as what we see.

quote:

---

I guess the USS Cole bombing was a false flag as well

And the first attack on the WTC parking garage

---

The USS Cole was not a false flag. It actually WAS done by Al Qaeda and a small motorboat riding up next to the Cole with waving occupants that crashed into the ship ...VERY LOW TECH, didn't require massive planning, and the sailors on the USS Cole should've neutralized that boat before it got that close but then the US would be the big bad guy.

The first WTC attack, the 93 bombing WAS definitely a set up with inside help.

quote:

---

The truthers don’t want facts.

---

On the same token, the “truthers” who lump anyone who dares question the official 9/11 narrative as “truthers” have no interest in facts or a genuine discussion about the matter either.

See how that works?

quote:

---

See how that works?

---

See my posts in the thread

I could care less about those subjective details, honestly.

What I do care about as it pertains to the Pentagon:

9/10/01 it was announced 2.3 Trillion is unaccounted for in black budget spending.

9/11/01 the budget analyst office at the Pentagon is directly hit, destroying all information inside. At the same time, the other location this information was housed was destroyed at WTC7 in NYC.

quote:

---

That's steel literally disintegrating to dust in the middle of the air which is why there wasn't nearly enough debris at ground zero for a collapsed building of that size.

---

You’re fricking bonkers dude

“literally disintegrating to dust”

If that’s what you see then you need to get your head checked. But I already knew you were one of those types.