- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/9/20 at 5:55 pm to ShortyRob
Can you answer that for me lawyer?
Posted on 5/9/20 at 5:56 pm to the808bass
quote:Well. I mean. I did pretty much call this two days ago.
You’re skipping over huge subsections or posters to limit it to people who think just like you. That’s pretty dumb. But you’re wound up and raring to go.
Just sayin
Who do you feel fits the description you laid out? I'll look.
Posted on 5/9/20 at 5:57 pm to blzr
quote:Can I answer why a known thief is a criminal?
Can you answer that for me lawyer?
Is this a serious question?
Posted on 5/9/20 at 5:57 pm to FlexDawg
quote:
FlexDawg
Yea i read the statute. They were not in the presence during the crime And did not have immediate knowledge of it according to what they told police at the time. According to their own description he just saw someone running down the street, and planned to confront him because there were break ins over the past few weeks. Citizens arrest requirements were not met.
Posted on 5/9/20 at 5:57 pm to ShortyRob
Yeah what did he do here that makes him a criminal? Walking through an under construction house?
Posted on 5/9/20 at 5:58 pm to MeatCleaverWeaver
quote:
This man gets it.
Yeah
Unfortunately for the race baiters...……..CNN doesn't control what goes on in a courtroom.
Posted on 5/9/20 at 5:58 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
this story is going to go to shite in a courtroom
What story?
Posted on 5/9/20 at 5:58 pm to Aristo
it’s going to hinge on when that “confrontation “ is defined.
If the “confrontation” is him charging them, they walk.
If prosecution argues they should have never been there with weapons to make an arrest and that is the “confrontation”, they’re murderers.
Hence my original assertion.
If the “confrontation” is him charging them, they walk.
If prosecution argues they should have never been there with weapons to make an arrest and that is the “confrontation”, they’re murderers.
Hence my original assertion.
This post was edited on 5/9/20 at 5:59 pm
Posted on 5/9/20 at 5:58 pm to the808bass
quote:
Immediate has been interpreted to mean “in person.”
The law specifically differentiates in person and immediate, so this is horseshite.
Not saying a moron da hasn’t ignored the law, but that doesn’t make a lick of sense.
Posted on 5/9/20 at 5:59 pm to blzr
quote:He's a criminal.
Yeah what did he do here that makes him a criminal?
You can dance on a pin if you like and white knight for the criminal, but he's still a criminal.
Posted on 5/9/20 at 5:59 pm to Tiguar
They will be convicted of murder, no doubt
Posted on 5/9/20 at 5:59 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:Exactly
The law specifically differentiates in person and immediate, so this is horseshite.
It's readily obvious that "in person" isn't required based on that language.
Posted on 5/9/20 at 6:00 pm to ShortyRob
so you can’t answer 
thanks bud
thanks bud
Posted on 5/9/20 at 6:00 pm to blzr
quote:
They will be convicted of murder, no doubt
I’ll bookmark this for next year when the trial is concluded Posted on 5/9/20 at 6:00 pm to blzr
quote:You are going to be sorely disappointed.
They will be convicted of murder, no doubt
Don't say I didn't warn you.
Posted on 5/9/20 at 6:00 pm to blzr
You can say it’s reasonable to assume he was up to no good. I think that’s appropriate and fits into the “real world” and not PC mumbo jumbo.
But, none of that is justification for a citizens arrest. So even if the McMichaels saw him coming out of the house, they don’t have immediate knowledge of a felony. And they didn’t see that. So they still don’t have a justification of a citizen’s arrest.
But, none of that is justification for a citizens arrest. So even if the McMichaels saw him coming out of the house, they don’t have immediate knowledge of a felony. And they didn’t see that. So they still don’t have a justification of a citizen’s arrest.
Posted on 5/9/20 at 6:00 pm to The Pirate King
quote:And that poster will be a ghost...…….like they always are
I’ll bookmark this for next year when the trial is concluded
Posted on 5/9/20 at 6:02 pm to the808bass
So from all indications, even the crime that the person who made the phone call (who witnessed the activity) and reported to the folks who attempted to detain him, would be (according to the person who actually witnessed what was going on) ... misdemeanor trespassing?
This post was edited on 5/9/20 at 6:03 pm
Posted on 5/9/20 at 6:02 pm to KCT
quote:
Wow, I'm absolutely SHOCKED that the angry black dude AKA cwill would blindly support a black criminal. Shocked, I say.
Again.
Page 10 of 25
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News