- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: After reading some idiotic comments I figured I’d help a few people to not be idiots...
Posted on 8/23/19 at 7:46 pm to 9th life
Posted on 8/23/19 at 7:46 pm to 9th life
quote:
Hiding behind your absolutism on this issue because trump is melting today? Id want to talk about anything else today if i were you, too.
You: Melting=Not kissing China’s arse
1
Posted on 8/23/19 at 7:48 pm to wookalar1013
quote:
looks like the someone else's body falls within the greater your body you know, logic and stuff
You know another time when one person’s body is within the body of another person?
Intercourse.
Not the whole body of course, so she can’t kill him. But that penis is within her body so she can do whatever she wants with it right? I mean, it’s not even a person, just some tissue, a clump of cells really. Because you know, logic and stuff.
Posted on 8/23/19 at 7:50 pm to FlexDawg
Trump stance on China is about the only thing that people agreed upon across party lines. It was his idiotic methodology that people disputed.
Anyway to your point, neither of those pictures are “my body” And nobody tells me what to do with “my body.” I won’t tell you what to do with yours.
Anyway to your point, neither of those pictures are “my body” And nobody tells me what to do with “my body.” I won’t tell you what to do with yours.
Posted on 8/23/19 at 7:58 pm to FlexDawg
That's cute.
Call someone retarded, employs incorrect form of it's.
My point stands, you failed and are not very good at this.
Call someone retarded, employs incorrect form of it's.
My point stands, you failed and are not very good at this.
This post was edited on 8/23/19 at 8:01 pm
Posted on 8/23/19 at 8:00 pm to victoire sécurisé
quote:
We like our oversimplification of extremely complex topics, don’t we folks?
It's not complex at all.
What's complex is the mental gymnastics pro abortion people have to do to rationalize killing an innocent human.
Posted on 8/23/19 at 8:08 pm to 9th life
quote:
Anyway to your point, neither of those pictures are “my body” And nobody tells me what to do with “my body.” I won’t tell you what to do with yours.
So if you neighbor shoots his wife in the head do you think he should go to jail even though “it’s none of your business”? Or would you just say “nah bruh ain’t got nothin to do with me just leave him alone”.
Posted on 8/23/19 at 8:10 pm to Tactical1
quote:
My point stands, you failed and are not very good at this.
You don’t have a point. You have no logic and are a hopeless emotionally driven individual.
Posted on 8/23/19 at 8:12 pm to FlexDawg
quote:
So if you neighbor shoots his wife in the head do you think he should go to jail even though “it’s none of your business”? Or would you just say “nah bruh ain’t got nothin to do with me just leave him alone”.
Good god this is a whole lot of stupid.
This is your retort?
Posted on 8/23/19 at 8:12 pm to Lightning
quote:
You know another time when one person’s body is within the body of another person?
Intercourse.
Not the whole body of course, so she can’t kill him. But that penis is within her body so she can do whatever she wants with it right? I mean, it’s not even a person, just some tissue, a clump of cells really. Because you know, logic and stuff.
Jesus Christ, son.
You are in desperate need of a biology class.
Posted on 8/23/19 at 8:13 pm to wookalar1013
quote:
looks like the someone else's body falls within the greater your body
you know, logic and stuff
By this logic, when your truck (someone else's property) pulls up on my driveway (falls within the greater property) then I can damage it without fault or complaint?
Posted on 8/23/19 at 8:13 pm to Tactical1
quote:
Good god this is a whole lot of stupid. This is your retort?
You cannot debate. You just get mad that I flush your logic down the toilet and then respond with “dat stupid”.
Posted on 8/23/19 at 8:15 pm to stuntman
quote:
It’s not complex at all.
It’s so complex that even the most dogmatic of us can question right and wrong.
Posted on 8/23/19 at 8:15 pm to FlexDawg
I mean, I wouldn’t shoot my wife In the head? But if I did I suppose I would face the consequences
Your analogy is really weak. What do either of these people have to do with my body?
Your analogy is really weak. What do either of these people have to do with my body?
This post was edited on 8/23/19 at 8:17 pm
Posted on 8/23/19 at 8:16 pm to wookalar1013
quote:
looks like the someone else's body falls within the greater your body
Killing any body is a sin and a crime. Congrats?
Posted on 8/23/19 at 8:17 pm to FlexDawg
quote:
You don’t have a point. You have no logic and are a hopeless emotionally driven individual
Except I do.
You're not qualified to even talk about this, and your analogy made that painfully clear.
Posted on 8/23/19 at 8:20 pm to FlexDawg
quote:
You cannot debate.
I imagine you think you can.
You do know the first rule of debate is that if you have to insult the other person you already lost the argument.
But of course you didn't know that.
Posted on 8/23/19 at 8:20 pm to FlexDawg
How libs think:
Scenario 1. Woman kills her baby. If you want to sugarcoat you can refer to it as terminate, abort, choice, etc.
You say well that’s her choice. It’s her body and I don’t have a right to tell her what to do with it.
Scenario 2. Your neighbor kills his wife. You don’t sugarcoat with sweet words for some reason.
You say well he should go to jail. It’s not his body but if he could have somehow shrunk her and stuffed her inside of him before killing her it would have been ok.
Great logic...
Scenario 1. Woman kills her baby. If you want to sugarcoat you can refer to it as terminate, abort, choice, etc.
You say well that’s her choice. It’s her body and I don’t have a right to tell her what to do with it.
Scenario 2. Your neighbor kills his wife. You don’t sugarcoat with sweet words for some reason.
You say well he should go to jail. It’s not his body but if he could have somehow shrunk her and stuffed her inside of him before killing her it would have been ok.
Great logic...
Posted on 8/23/19 at 8:21 pm to Tactical1
Op says First rule is bring a moronic diagram.
Posted on 8/23/19 at 8:21 pm to victoire sécurisé
No, it isn't complex.
If your life is in danger, then you have a right to defend from dying.
I love how the pro abortion side uses the rarest of the rare circumstances like the example you gave in order to make the case for abortion as a convenience.
If your life is in danger, then you have a right to defend from dying.
I love how the pro abortion side uses the rarest of the rare circumstances like the example you gave in order to make the case for abortion as a convenience.
Posted on 8/23/19 at 8:22 pm to 9th life
quote:
I mean, I wouldn’t shoot my wife In the head? But if I did I suppose I would face the consequences
Your analogy is really weak. What do either of these people have to do with my body?
Jeez dude get some reading Comprehension skills.
Page 2 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News