re: ACLU Political Director on Tucker

I remember when they defended Nazi's marching in Skokie, Ill.

That worm has turned.

This bullshite started out as just, "this isn't a reasonable- doubt standard," which is technically true, to "there is no presumption of innocence," which is categorically absurd.

There is always a presumption against the person who has the burden to show/prove something (and in favor of the accused)--that's the very reason that burden exists. The weight of the burden is a different issue from who has to carry it.

I don't care what the forum, or if I'm just walking down the street, if someone accuses me of harming him or her, they have a burden of showing that.

You'd think an ACLU lawyer would get that.

And the, this is a job interview so there are no standards whatsoever is a dangerous precedent to set, regardless of political party.

I have a final cost-benefit analysis I've been hashing out, but I'm too tired for it right now. This shite is exhausting.

quote:

---

Like most of these leftist cucks, ACLU beta couldn't debate on the merit, resorts to strawman arguments muh standing up for all women, job interview, no presumption of innocence

---

I think the job interview talking point is my favorite. Just wait until someone defends their practice of not hiring minorities, women, etc by arguing that the company suspected the applicant had gotten emotional at some point in their life and had thrown ice while in college and the applicant could not prove their innocence. Therefore, no job for them

I’m really hoping some lib gets fired because they were accused of something (that they really are innocent of) and can’t prove their innocence. I want the lib to sue and the case to get to the SC. I picture a 4-4 split with the deciding vote belonging to Kavanaugh. Can you imagine the meltdown that would take place?