re: About those names Massie said he had

Massie said he had one name and released it.

This now begs questions his supporters will never ask.

How did Massie get a single name who just happened to be donating against him? Are we to believe that Massie had access but only to a single document?

Did Massie get this single name from a "trusted source?" If so, wouldn't that indicate the source had access to the files and could provide more than a single name?

Why was Massie only happy with one name if it involved powerful people abusing children? Is his concern for only a single name related to the political contributions that one person makes?

Why is Massie promoting these victims' stories without verification? The most basic question before holding a press conference about sexual abuse and abuse of power should be Who? For a story this explosive, he should know everything about it before making it a platform. Otherwise, he just comes off as a Sharpton/Crump-like grifter riding a national story just for fame and wealth.

Massie says he wants the truth to come out but then doesn't even ask the most basic questions. He instead wants to make everything a political issue. And that would be fine if people didn't pretend he was being altruistic. Just admit Massie cares more about Epstein as a means to getting reelected than he does getting justice for the victims.

The more you guys try to defend Massie the worse he looks. I don't know how anyone can't see that this is just a political tool for him. I wish he worked this hard passing other legislation.