- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/24/20 at 3:25 pm to ShortyRob
quote:No. He is being impeached for his extortion scheme and coverup.
And?
We gonna impeach for legal firings now?
Posted on 1/24/20 at 3:27 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
He is being impeached for his extortion scheme and coverup
*was. He was impeached.
Posted on 1/24/20 at 3:27 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
No. He is being impeached for his extortion scheme and coverup.
Really?
I thought it was "abuse of power" and "obstruction of Congress"?
Why is there not an article for extortion?
Posted on 1/24/20 at 3:28 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
Sure does.
Why did you use great? Why did you leave off the I’ve heard part?
Because you have a need to lie? Words have meaning and nuance are prog staples, no?
Like I said, prog tells lie, prog repeats lie. TDS is a helluva thing.
Why did you use great? Why did you leave off the I’ve heard part?
Because you have a need to lie? Words have meaning and nuance are prog staples, no?
Like I said, prog tells lie, prog repeats lie. TDS is a helluva thing.
Posted on 1/24/20 at 3:32 pm to roadGator
I didn’t. I said very good
Posted on 1/24/20 at 3:41 pm to The Maj
quote:They change it according to what sounds best at the time.
I thought it was "abuse of power" and "obstruction of Congress"?
Posted on 1/24/20 at 3:42 pm to L.A.
The repubs will dismantle all the dems made up taking points by showing the un-edited versions of actual videos and recordings
Posted on 1/24/20 at 3:43 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:Dunno! Maybe there is a recording ....
Wonder what Zelensky thought of that...
Ya'll got heeem THIS time !!!
Posted on 1/24/20 at 3:59 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
So it’s my understanding that’s what led to Trump mentioning the investigation to Zelensky in the call
But you don’t know. You’re speculating. That’s the issue with all this. The hoops you are willing to jump through and the logical leaps you are willing to take to get to Trump are clear. Yet whenever we have:
Ukraine Prosecutor Office opens investigation into Burisma -> PO starts requesting documents and bank records -> Burisma emails the State Department about investigation, even name drops Hunter Biden as being on BOS -> 1 month later Joe Biden makes call to Ukraine threatening to withhold funding if a prosecutor isn’t fired -> Shokin gets fired from position and replaced by Lutsenko, who is extremely unqualified for the position and doesn’t even have a law degree, but Biden refers to as “solid.”
Nothing to see there. Can’t make any connections that there was something shady going on. Nope, anyone who wants to look into that is a conspiracy theorist.
It’s all just so maddening that you are willing to ignore the elephant in the room to try and shine a light on the mouse.
Posted on 1/24/20 at 4:05 pm to Baron
Good God, you’re selective summary is leaving out a ton of information.
You’ve got your mouses and elephants all mixed up
You’ve got your mouses and elephants all mixed up
Posted on 1/24/20 at 4:06 pm to L.A.
They got him.
He said “fire her” a year and half before she was fired. :green guy emote:
He said “fire her” a year and half before she was fired. :green guy emote:
Posted on 1/24/20 at 4:06 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
I owe you an apology. The other prog said great. Not you.
You did leave off the I heard part and that is relative.
I heard he was very good is different than he is very good.
You did leave off the I heard part and that is relative.
I heard he was very good is different than he is very good.
This post was edited on 1/24/20 at 4:15 pm
Posted on 1/24/20 at 4:15 pm to roadGator
No worries. Simple mistake. But I think we’re splitting hairs here.
Posted on 1/24/20 at 4:18 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
No. He is being impeached for his extortion scheme and coverup.
LOL
So now we just make shite up out of thin air?
The day you sick fricks get power back will be scary.
Posted on 1/24/20 at 4:22 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
Nuance, right. It seems to matter to progs until it doesn’t.
Can you see that?
Can you see that?
Posted on 1/24/20 at 4:30 pm to roadGator
I see it as a 2 way street. Trump’s words can’t be taken literally, until they can only be taken literally....
Posted on 1/24/20 at 4:33 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
So nuance.
Posted on 1/24/20 at 4:36 pm to roadGator
Yes, it’s frustrating to have to have the nuance of a what Trump “meant to say” explained
Posted on 1/24/20 at 4:38 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
Here is what Biden said happened When he was in Kiev.
That “solid” someone was Lutsenko, who had no qualifications and already gone to prison years earlier for fraud. You are upset about this vague Lutsenko and Parnas connection because of the character of Lutsenko. But you got your prosecutors confused at first and were upset that Trump said he had heard Lutsenko was a good guy. Now that you know you got your facts mixed up, does it bother you that Biden praised Lutsenko amd called him a solid guy after he got Shokin removed?
quote:
“I was supposed to announce that there was another billion-dollar loan guarantee,” Mr. Biden said. “I had gotten,” he added, “a commitment from [President] Poroshenko and from [Prime Minister] Yatsenyuk that they would take action against the state prosecutor. And they didn’t. So they said they had — they were walking out to a press conference. I said, nah, I’m not going to — or, we’re not going to give you the billion dollars. They said, ‘you have no authority. You’re not the president.’” “The president said — I said, call him,” Mr. Biden replied, evoking, the CFR transcript notes, laughter. “I said, ‘I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars.’ I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in,’ I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.’ Well, son of a bitch. [Laughter.] He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.”
That “solid” someone was Lutsenko, who had no qualifications and already gone to prison years earlier for fraud. You are upset about this vague Lutsenko and Parnas connection because of the character of Lutsenko. But you got your prosecutors confused at first and were upset that Trump said he had heard Lutsenko was a good guy. Now that you know you got your facts mixed up, does it bother you that Biden praised Lutsenko amd called him a solid guy after he got Shokin removed?
Page 5 of 7
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News