- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/29/25 at 10:59 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
If its Nato, US contribution ought to be cut to 1 % less than the average nato country.
Oh, look…it’s someone who doesn’t understand that “NATO funding” is each nations own defense spending relative to their own GDP.
Imagine thinking, in 2025, that “NATO funding” is each country is paying into some nonexistent common fund
Posted on 12/29/25 at 11:03 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:If he had the ... fortitude ... to answer your question, it would be something about how Ukraine was being mean to ethnic Russians in eastern Ukraine and how St. Vlad of Putin was doing God's work by invading Donbas to protect those poor Christian souls from the godless Nazi Ukrainians.
Russia invaded a sovereign country to start.quote:Oh, please explain?
Wrong again.
Let's assume, just for shits and giggles, that Ukraine was indeed being mean to some of its ethnic Russians. Hell, it may even be true. But that "fact" would not change the unassailable fact that St. Vlad DID invade a sovereign country, even if he did so for the (chuckle) most-noble of reasons.
This post was edited on 12/29/25 at 11:05 pm
Posted on 12/29/25 at 11:10 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
No - nothing noble about this.
This is just about stealing former USSR land back because Putin doesn’t respect Ukraine’s sovereignty. And he feels like
he can no longer “own” Ukraine via his puppet leaders that he had installed and that did his bidding.
And there have been so many reasons given for the invasion, the narrative has shifted all over the place. But it was never really about protecting ethnic Russians.
We don’t just have to accept obvious Putin falsehoods just because they are repeated 1,000 times.
This is just about stealing former USSR land back because Putin doesn’t respect Ukraine’s sovereignty. And he feels like
he can no longer “own” Ukraine via his puppet leaders that he had installed and that did his bidding.
And there have been so many reasons given for the invasion, the narrative has shifted all over the place. But it was never really about protecting ethnic Russians.
We don’t just have to accept obvious Putin falsehoods just because they are repeated 1,000 times.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 11:11 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
You seem very fragile.
Apologies for triggering you.
No, I just despise condescending dipshats full of themselves. BTW, so you are Hank - did not contest that at all.
This post was edited on 12/29/25 at 11:14 pm
Popular
Back to top

0





