- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/12/23 at 11:30 pm to cwill
quote:
liberals...it's actually coming from his own party
I'm not sure these are mutually exclusive.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 11:32 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
quote:
liberals...it's actually coming from his own party
I'm not sure these are mutually exclusive.
Of course. Everyone who's not sucking that maga dick is now a liberal. And vice versa, if you make maga noises you can be any species of scumbag and get a free pass from the cult. Congrats.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 11:33 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
I haven't given that any thought.
I guess you're just mindlessly quoting things again.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 11:34 pm to cwill
quote:
Of course. Everyone who's not sucking that maga dick is now a liberal. And vice versa, if you make maga noises you can be any species of scumbag and get a free pass from the cult. Congrats.
shite, I forgot for a second you're a retard and responded to your question in good faith.
Mistake won't happen again.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 11:35 pm to cwill
quote:
He also seems to not understand that impeachment is not a criminal trial and the same rules do not apply.
He understands. He’s using this fact to influence the senators and to underscore the weakness of the claims.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 11:35 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
shite, I forgot for a second you're a retard and responded to your question in good faith.
Mistake won't happen again.
Not surprised to find you're a listless vessel...who else could possibly think Paxton's election case was credible.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 11:36 pm to Riverside
quote:
He understands. He’s using this fact to influence the senators and to underscore the weakness of the claims.
Is that why he objected to his own exhibit?
Posted on 9/12/23 at 11:37 pm to cwill
The Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction over cases involving the several states. It was a clever argument. And 2 justices agreed that the case should be heard on the merits.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 11:38 pm to cwill
quote:
Is that why he objected to his own exhibit?
Provide us with a record cite or STFU.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 11:40 pm to Riverside
quote:
Provide us with a record cite or STFU.
quote:
Buzbee v. Hardin. The defense team objected to nearly every piece of evidence proffered by the prosecution, claiming that many of them—including internal emails from the attorney general’s office—were subject to attorney-client privilege. At one point, Buzbee even objected to one of his own exhibits. When Hardin pointed this out, Buzbee, apparently caught off guard, tried to argue that he had never intended to use the exhibit at trial. After nearly ten minutes of arguments, Patrick, acting as the presiding judge, said he needed time to make a decision and adjourned the trial for the day.
LINK
Posted on 9/12/23 at 11:41 pm to cwill
quote:
I guess you're just mindlessly quoting things again.
I presented the tweet as the author did with zero bias on my part.
You are projecting something onto me that I never said or thought.
Stop hallucinating.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 11:42 pm to cwill
quote:
Not surprised to find you're a listless vessel...who else could possibly think Paxton's election case was credible.
You don't have to pile on, you're firmly in the your grouping with the other idiots.
Actually, feel free to flail around some more, it offers some entertainment, it's just not necessary.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 11:43 pm to cwill
quote:
Buzbee, apparently caught off guard, tried to argue that he had never intended to use the exhibit at trial.
Omitting relevant context. That’s a theme with your posts.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 11:44 pm to Riverside
quote:
The Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction over cases involving the several states. It was a clever argument. And 2 justices agreed that the case should be heard on the merits.
Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas indicated they would have allowed Texas to bring the case but said they would "not grant other relief." None of Trump's appointees indicated they saw any merit in the lawsuit.
I don't think the SCt was going to allow another state to intervene in the election procedures of another state...it's sophomoric mayhem and was rightfully rejected...really, even by the two judges who like to not report gifts from donors.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 11:45 pm to Riverside
quote:
Omitting relevant context.
You're reaching and not even credibly. Sad.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 11:46 pm to TrueTiger
Amazing. That attorney is worth every penny that Paxton's paying him!
Posted on 9/12/23 at 11:46 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
ou don't have to pile on, you're firmly in the your grouping with the other idiots.
What?
quote:
Actually, feel free to flail around some more, it offers some entertainment, it's just not necessary.
Pal, the flailing is the quoted sentence above. Your screenname makes more sense now.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 11:48 pm to cwill
quote:
even by the two judges who like to not report gifts from donors.
Talk about sophomoric pablum. Sheesh.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 11:49 pm to cwill
quote:
it's actually coming from his own party and their votes will be the decisive votes. You didn't know this?
spearheading vs accommodating
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News