- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 3 questions about Trump J6 case that don't make sense
Posted on 8/9/23 at 1:39 pm to LSUCap
Posted on 8/9/23 at 1:39 pm to LSUCap
Do Trump followers not realize how idiotic they sound with the RINO rhetoric? The true RINO is the guy you worship. A lifetime pro choice democrat who realized that he could never win the democratic nomination so he went to the other party because they would be gullible enough to swallow his crap.
This post was edited on 8/9/23 at 1:41 pm
1
Posted on 8/9/23 at 1:54 pm to woody1984
quote:
Not my job to provide evidence.
True. It's not even your job to base your opinion on evidence if you don't want to, though that is a reasonable expectation.
Put it this way; If I hit you with a verbatim recitation of the defense's case in a way that implies it is stipulated fact, would you expect some support or evidence?
Posted on 8/9/23 at 2:04 pm to burger bearcat
quote:
B) Did Trump believe the election was stolen?
No he doesnt, he was told many times by his adivser that there was no election fraud. This is just an excuse because he lost and wants more of your money.
quote:
Former President Donald Trump signed legal documents challenging the results of the 2020 election that included voter fraud claims he knew to be false, a federal judge said in a ruling Wednesday. "The emails show that President Trump knew that the specific numbers of voter fraud were wrong but continued to tout those numbers, both in court and to the public," the judge wrote.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 2:08 pm to GRTiger
verbatim recitation
I have been saying these things for over two years so I didn’t need to repeat anything verbatim. If there is any verbatim it’s Smith quoting me.
I have been saying these things for over two years so I didn’t need to repeat anything verbatim. If there is any verbatim it’s Smith quoting me.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 2:37 pm to woody1984
alright man
Posted on 8/9/23 at 2:59 pm to burger bearcat
quote:
A) In the scenario, an election was either stolen or rigged (let's just say it was), how should a canidate attempt to adjudicate or correct this? Not say anything at all? Republican or Democrat, what is the proper process for challenging an election if it was indeed fraudulent? (Again, just pretend it was even if you don't think it was)
Court cases. WIth proof. Lacking proof, you're going to lose all of your court cases (as Trump did). Wishcasting isn't fact.
quote:
B) Did Trump believe the election was stolen? This seems pretty important, if he "believes" it was stolen, then shouldn't we say all the principles for point A should apply to point B. (Whether he was right or wrong, if that is his belief)
Inarguably he knew that he lost the election. He is on the record stating that he lost, and that things should be left for "the next guy". But he couldn't turn off the money spigot and he thought Pence would help him throw a coup, so he kept lying about it publicly.
quote:
C) How does Jack Smith prove what Trump was thinking? What level if burden of proof would he need to show to say Trump was lying intentionally with the direct purpose of defrauding or inciting a riot?
He doesn't need to, but he can show that he was told by almost all of his attorneys / staff that the election was lost, and that he admitted as much. That's enough to get an easy conviction for Trump (which is what is coming).
Posted on 8/9/23 at 3:07 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
you're going to lose all of your court cases (as Trump did)
Trump only
Personally filed 3 and won 2. Are you ignorant on all matters, or just legal ones?
Posted on 8/9/23 at 3:08 pm to GRTiger
quote:
alright man
He didn’t understand the point of your post. That’s why his reply was non-responsive.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 3:14 pm to burger bearcat
He asked Pence to not certify. Seems like exactly the kind of thing someone who though the election was stolen would do.
Game. Set. Match.
Game. Set. Match.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 3:23 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Trump only Personally filed 3 and won 2.
And none of those others were filed at his direction or on his behalf. I have a bridge to sell you, chump.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 3:27 pm to woody1984
quote:
Do Trump followers not realize how idiotic they sound with the RINO rhetoric
They want their point of view to be the basis of law. ryan moved the tea party movement bill to senate for a vote to repeal and replace and Republican senators refused to go on record. no up down vote.
the tea party bill failed.
the idealistic ideas failed. Ryan bill no insurance coverage on 22 to 25 kids.
no pre existing disease coverages. not even a vote.
mexico farted in his general direction.
trumps term includes no bill worth discussing.
tax cut for rich and companies. trillions more debt.
he whined when biden Pelosi passed the infrastructure bill. why didnt we do an infrastructure bill? i wanted one you know.
This post was edited on 8/9/23 at 3:30 pm
Posted on 8/9/23 at 3:32 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
He asked Pence to not certify. Seems like exactly the kind of thing someone who though the election was stolen would do.
Sounds like someone so power hungry he would do anything he could to stay in power.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 4:41 pm to burger bearcat
quote:easy....
C) How does Jack Smith prove what Trump was thinking? What level if burden of proof would he need to show to say Trump was lying intentionally with the direct purpose of defrauding or inciting a riot?
DC jury pool
Posted on 8/9/23 at 5:43 pm to CelticDog
quote:
tax cut for rich
Hell yeah!
quote:
trillions more debt.
Perhaps, but that’s not because of the tax cuts.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 5:48 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
And none of those others were filed at his direction or on his behalf. I have a bridge to sell you, chump.
What is the relevance of this retort?
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News