- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2016 Hypothetical: Ted Cruz vs Elizabeth Warren
Posted on 12/16/14 at 11:33 am to Hawkeye95
Posted on 12/16/14 at 11:33 am to Hawkeye95
quote:
I don't like all of her politics but I think she is directionally correct on the banking oligarchy.
Agreed, and the irony is a lot of the banking influence in DC can be traced back to Clinton's Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin.
0
Posted on 12/16/14 at 11:41 am to KCT
Cruz
Cruz
Cruz
Posted on 12/16/14 at 11:44 am to CherryGarciaMan
Posted on 12/16/14 at 11:45 am to Erin Go Bragh
quote:
I would vote for Ted Cruz in a second but he won't even sniff at the party's nomination. Warren may have a shot.
In an head-to-head, basing it off this November's voter referendum, I'd give the nod to Cruz.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 11:53 am to KCT
Cruz would destroy her in a debate. She would start crying.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 11:53 am to Pettifogger
quote:
What banking reforms are you hoping for
Breaking up the too big to fail institutions would be a good start.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 11:55 am to KCT
I can't say Warren is a long-shot. She will have a deathgrip on the party's base, AND she's getting OFA.
If that's a longshot, anyone except HRC is (and she's fading fast).
If that's a longshot, anyone except HRC is (and she's fading fast).
Posted on 12/16/14 at 11:58 am to Road Tiger
quote:
Didn't Warren come out yesterday and say that she's not considering a run in 2016?
"I'm not running for President." - meaning she is not running right now.
She said nothing about ruling out a run or "considering" a run. So I ask the question - why would you need a special, "Chief Liberal in the Senate" leadership position, AND OFA - if one was not even considering a run for President?
Biden and HRC are givens. Warren would run ahead of both of those in several states. Why wouldn't she consider it?
Posted on 12/17/14 at 11:44 am to Hawkeye95
One talking head on Fox said that Warren as president would make Obama look like Ronald Regan. Cruz is detested by a very large majority of the Republican party.
Posted on 12/17/14 at 11:55 am to Ace Midnight
quote:ISWYDT
"Chief Liberal in the Senate"
Posted on 12/17/14 at 11:58 am to KCT
1. Cruz
2. Warren
2. Warren
Posted on 12/17/14 at 12:12 pm to Keltic Tiger
quote:
Cruz is detested by a very large majority of the Republican party.
Only if you believe the entire republican party consist of the stasis adoring members of congress. The establishment part of the party fears Cruz and for me that's a ringing endorsement for the senator.
Posted on 12/17/14 at 12:19 pm to Holden Caulfield
quote:And the portion of the party that isn't so socially conservative that they want to ban gay pride parades and have the federal govt. define marriage.
establishment part of the party fears Cruz
Posted on 12/17/14 at 12:25 pm to KCT
You might as well start a thread "snowball vs ice cube. Which has a better chance in Hell"
Posted on 12/17/14 at 12:25 pm to Ace Midnight
God you people are delusional
Posted on 12/17/14 at 12:26 pm to Vegas Bengal
Bengal, would you vote for john kasich over warren?
Posted on 12/17/14 at 12:34 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
She has the same shot Kucinech had and I never thought what if with either. If I disliked the nominee I would do what others here have said they'd do with a bad GOP nominee, vote 3rd party. You OTOH have said you would always vote GOP
Posted on 12/17/14 at 12:35 pm to KCT
I don't think Lieawatha can get the nomination.
Posted on 12/17/14 at 12:35 pm to Vegas Bengal
I voted for Jerry brown because he went against his democratic friends and cut the budget.
Your assertion was built on weak and shifting sand.
Your assertion was built on weak and shifting sand.
Posted on 12/17/14 at 12:40 pm to Blue Velvet
quote:
And the portion of the party that isn't so socially conservative that they want to ban gay pride parades and have the federal govt. define marriage.
I suppose for me positions on social issues are the least determining factor for selecting a president. I understand their significance but eight years of a president focused solely on the social is enough for a while.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News