- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Veterans: How much use does a military pistol actually get in deployment?
Posted on 12/16/18 at 2:44 am to dstone12
Posted on 12/16/18 at 2:44 am to dstone12
quote:
How much use does a military pistol actually get in deployment?
It's extremely rare that a pistol would be used in combat.
Normally, a pistol sees a couple of thousand rounds a year at the range (including both quals and drills.)
A pistol is better suited for defense, but in CQB, it's quicker to transition to your sidearm than it is to perform remedial action on your primary weapon.
ETA: If you have to draw your sidearm in a tactical situation, you and your team are probably having a very bad day!
This post was edited on 12/16/18 at 2:47 am
Posted on 12/16/18 at 5:39 am to WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot
Heck, when I was in, we had old .45's. Suckers were like baby raddles. They were finished.
Posted on 12/16/18 at 7:46 am to fishfighter
Percentage wise I can see how people would rather not bring one due to weight and just having one more thing. But the few that did and used it, I’m sure were very glad they had it.
I always laugh at the movies when someone runs past multiple loaded weapons from someone dead or injured because they have their pistol. You know that shite never happens in real life.
I always laugh at the movies when someone runs past multiple loaded weapons from someone dead or injured because they have their pistol. You know that shite never happens in real life.
Posted on 12/16/18 at 11:19 am to dstone12
Could you give a percentage of how many combatants were actually shot with a pistol?
2 tours and I knew of only one. A detainee slipped his zip cuffs charged a guy they went to the ground. SM got to his pistol and put one in his ear.
2 tours and I knew of only one. A detainee slipped his zip cuffs charged a guy they went to the ground. SM got to his pistol and put one in his ear.
This post was edited on 12/16/18 at 11:21 am
Posted on 12/16/18 at 6:00 pm to YawBaw7
you obviously have no experience in the military. of course you need to conceal a gun any time you're in a combat zone. you wont always be lugging that rife around, and you damned well BETTER always be ready to be shoot some pos at a bar,going by you in a vehicle, on a bike, etc
Posted on 12/16/18 at 6:03 pm to WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot
2000 rds a year thru a pistol? where, in a company that trains mps, at ait, maybe? no, man, in a combat zone, that pistol wont see 200 rds a year and probably wont fire 20 rds. unless you somehow smuggle in a lot of your own ammo. The pistol ammo is often hard to come by, since we no longer use SMGs and the battlefront is very limited in nature.
VERY few people are even issued a pistol. I never once fired mine (legally) my entire hitch in Korea. Mostly, there's no ranges at which to do any shooting and every round has to be accounted for if you're not in a combat zone. COPS in the US are not issued even 1000 rds a year, man. You guys are dreaming. The pistol is almost never used, other than for suicide. That said, a 1 lb pocket 9mm can be a great comfort. I'll always do with a cup less water or a lb less food to have one. It's the 3-4lbs of .45 and ammo that's a problem, not the 15 ozs of pocket 9mm.
VERY few people are even issued a pistol. I never once fired mine (legally) my entire hitch in Korea. Mostly, there's no ranges at which to do any shooting and every round has to be accounted for if you're not in a combat zone. COPS in the US are not issued even 1000 rds a year, man. You guys are dreaming. The pistol is almost never used, other than for suicide. That said, a 1 lb pocket 9mm can be a great comfort. I'll always do with a cup less water or a lb less food to have one. It's the 3-4lbs of .45 and ammo that's a problem, not the 15 ozs of pocket 9mm.
This post was edited on 12/16/18 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 12/16/18 at 8:36 pm to dstone12
It all depends on your MOS. As a corpsman in the Nam I was issued a Colt 45 and when they asked me if I wanted a weapon I said Hell yeah, give me an M-16. There's this thing called fire superiority. That 45 is for special occasions. I fired the 16 at the bad guys a few times but never the pistol. Unfortunately one of my marines accidentally killed his bunker mate while cleaning his damn pistol. Our FO (forward observer) used his pistol for a kill, but then again, it was a special occasion and FOs are carrying a radio and binoculars. I used the M-16 as a disguise although the Unit One (medical bag) probably gave me away. I was I loved my Colt but felt like I was naked without the 16.
Posted on 12/16/18 at 8:41 pm to dstone12
A deployment of mine was just watching third country nationals and local nationals that came on the base to do jobs fill sandbags, help build new long term shelters etc.
In those situations we carried M-16 and M-9. It was important for us though as we are in the middle of sleeping quarters. If we had to use our weapons M-9 having less velocity is better than M-16 considering what's on the other side of our targets
In those situations we carried M-16 and M-9. It was important for us though as we are in the middle of sleeping quarters. If we had to use our weapons M-9 having less velocity is better than M-16 considering what's on the other side of our targets
This post was edited on 12/16/18 at 8:43 pm
Posted on 12/16/18 at 10:06 pm to dstone12
I have two stories shared by my father and a platoon member who shared with me at a reunion that my father hosted at his home after his retirement. Both were how his sidearm saved his life. In WWII he survived the Iwo Jima landing and he was guarding his buddy while sleeping in a naval shell hole with his .45 in his hand. One night a shell exploded and illuminated a Japanese soldier attempting to bayonet his buddy. My father shot the Japanese with his pistol and saved his buddy and himself. He was discharged by the Marines and went to school and got his commission in the Army prior to Korea. In Korea on July 31, 1950 his company was overrun by the North Koreans and he was wounded through the thigh with a Burp Gun. He was of one of six out of the entire rifle company to survive the attack. He was able to get down the hill with his .45 in stomach of a South Korean who spoke to the North Koreans on the way down the hill.
This post was edited on 12/16/18 at 10:28 pm
Posted on 12/16/18 at 10:45 pm to entre
quote:
2000 rds a year thru a pistol?
Yes. Easily.
You did see where I said "at the range" didn't you?
On several occasions, I have seen multiple M-9's send 400 - 500 rounds downrange in one day.
quote:This is true, however when I was in the USMC, all Officers, Staff NCOs, Navy Corpsmen, and many Marines of lesser grade filling certain billets (Armory personnel, STA platoon, etc.) were allowed to qualify annually through the Entry Level Pistol (ELP) course of fire.
VERY few people are even issued a pistol.
Do you think we gave each swinging dick at the range a sidearm? HELL NO. We might take 15 - 20 pistols for ~50 bodies.
After you completed the course of fire, you passed that weapon off to the next shooter. Each shooter was usually allowed to complete the course of fire twice before firing for an official score on his third relay.
quote:
I never once fired mine (legally) my entire hitch in Korea.
I don't give a frick what you did (or didn't do), where you were, or what type of unit you were with.
Stick to your survival BS, 'cause you obviously don't know what you're talking about when it comes to marksmanship training.
Have a Merry Christmas!
Posted on 12/17/18 at 2:48 pm to FrenchJoe
quote:
It all depends on your MOS. As a corpsman in the Nam I was issued a Colt 45 and when they asked me if I wanted a weapon I said Hell yeah, give me an M-16. There's this thing called fire superiority. That 45 is for special occasions. I fired the 16 at the bad guys a few times but never the pistol. Unfortunately one of my marines accidentally killed his bunker mate while cleaning his damn pistol. Our FO (forward observer) used his pistol for a kill, but then again, it was a special occasion and FOs are carrying a radio and binoculars. I used the M-16 as a disguise although the Unit One (medical bag) probably gave me away. I was I loved my Colt but felt like I was naked without the 16.
All of our corpsmen did the same thing (carrying an M16 or M4 to blend in).
Posted on 12/20/18 at 9:06 am to Korin
Thanks!
So it looks like 8 out of 10 would say, don’t carry the pistol along with the rifle in deployment.
So it looks like 8 out of 10 would say, don’t carry the pistol along with the rifle in deployment.
Posted on 12/20/18 at 9:14 am to WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot
quote:This...for infinity.. I'm pretty salty with wheel gun.. but give me a rifle over any handgun in any tactical situation period... heck give me the 12 gauge with #4 buck....
ETA: If you have to draw your sidearm in a tactical situation, you and your team are probably having a very bad day!
now if i am air crew.... obviously a handgun is the only choice...
Posted on 12/20/18 at 10:03 am to dstone12
Veteran pistol carrier checking in. The Colt .45 was my primary weapon in the Army. It was because my MOS required me to carry around a tripod and a surveying transit (scope looking thing). So I couldn't carry a rifle and all of that shite with me at the same time.
And the colt was a beautiful pistol and a massive pile of shite. It was so old that it couldn't shoot straight. I was scared to death that they wouldn't give me an M16 if the shite ever hit the fan. Because if it did hit the fan I was better off throwing my pistol at the enemy. Our pistols were old and worn out. They were so worn out that at the end of my tenure we moved to the Beretta which was a fine piece of weaponry.
And the colt was a beautiful pistol and a massive pile of shite. It was so old that it couldn't shoot straight. I was scared to death that they wouldn't give me an M16 if the shite ever hit the fan. Because if it did hit the fan I was better off throwing my pistol at the enemy. Our pistols were old and worn out. They were so worn out that at the end of my tenure we moved to the Beretta which was a fine piece of weaponry.
Posted on 12/20/18 at 11:12 am to Broke
The Beretta (M9) gets way too much hate. It's being replaced with the Sig M17.
Posted on 5/23/19 at 7:44 am to Billyraychubbs
So overall,
If you get deployed with an m4, do you want a pistol to back it up?
Or would you consider it a burden and not worth the weight?
If you get deployed with an m4, do you want a pistol to back it up?
Or would you consider it a burden and not worth the weight?
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:21 pm to dstone12
I was an 0331 with a rifle company during my first deployment and then a weapons company during my second and was stuck with an M9 on my thigh. Never drew it outside the wire and never fired it overseas.
I'd estimate very little combatants were shot with a pistol.
I'd estimate very little combatants were shot with a pistol.
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:30 pm to WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot
Cousins kid to 2 Astan and told me if he had to go to his pistol the last bullet would be reserved for himself.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News