- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: officer taking pistol from vehicle
Posted on 11/13/13 at 4:45 pm to UpToPar
Posted on 11/13/13 at 4:45 pm to UpToPar
If I am being arrested as a result of a traffic stop you have reason to search my car, if you are pulling me over for speeding you don't have reason search my vehicle without my permission.
Same thing as an officer showing up at your house without a warrant, he can't come in and search your house, even if he/she see's a rack of guns 5ft behind you.
If you do see my gun on the seat, and ask that I hand it over to you during the traffic stop I will oblige, but I would hope you would also understand the laws of the state you officiate.
Same thing as an officer showing up at your house without a warrant, he can't come in and search your house, even if he/she see's a rack of guns 5ft behind you.
If you do see my gun on the seat, and ask that I hand it over to you during the traffic stop I will oblige, but I would hope you would also understand the laws of the state you officiate.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 4:48 pm to Five0
quote:
Is it locked?
Good god.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 4:49 pm to Who Me
quote:
the officer arrested Vinton for "possession of a prohibited weapon" under D.C. statute.
So the possessing the knife, by itself, was illegal. I'm assuming this is talking about the first knife found since they described the length of it. If that's the case, then this is materially different than our hypo.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 4:50 pm to swanny297
A vehicle isn't the same as a home. You have less rights in your vehicle.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 4:51 pm to UpToPar
quote:
So the possessing the knife, by itself, was illegal. I'm assuming this is talking about the first knife found since they described the length of it. If that's the case, then this is materially different than our hypo.
No. He was arrested for possessing the butterfly knife in conjunction with the escstasy that they later found.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 4:52 pm to UpToPar
I would guess the butterfly knife is the illegal weapon. Not sure though.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 4:52 pm to Who Me
quote:
I do believe you are making too much out of the difference of a weapon being in plain view as opposed to being under the seat or in a console. All would be readily accessible as a weapon.
A police officer looking into a car and seeing a gun is not a search. A police officer opening up a console or glove box seems to me to be a search.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 4:53 pm to UpToPar
quote:
Thus, in Vinton, the court similarly held that the sheathed knife, which was capable of inflicting serious bodily harm, did provide the officer with a sufficient basis to search the vehicle for other weapons, even after the officer removed the knife from the car and handcuffed Vinton. The court reasoned that this was because the officer may very well have to return Vinton his knife and release him in the car, thereby giving him access again to this weapon, and any other weapon inside.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 4:55 pm to Who Me
quote:
So you are saying in the center console is not accessible
No.
quote:
makes the driver not dangerous because he told me about it?
I would say it makes the driver much less dangerous. It also speaks to that individual's willingness to submit to authority. When I am told that I calmly ask, "Do you plan on hurting yourself or me with that weapon during this stop?" What they say next and how they say it play into that decision to ask them out of the car. I'm not going to go into tactics, but if they tell me there is a gun in the center console while showing a ccp 99 out of 100 of those cooperative persons have the sense to have their hands clearly visible and usually on the wheel. Just the way I like it. If they do not answer, hesitate, or answer in the affirmative, they are coming out. It it escalates from there I can articulate all kinds of use of force for both their safety and mine.
This boils down to an officer's ability to talk to people. Just communicating effectively with people will gain you vast amounts of cooperation and compliance. If it does not, then you still look like a reasonable officer for the dash cam footage that will play in court of you having to remove someone or worst case use deadly force. I said it many pages ago, play long ball.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 4:56 pm to Who Me
quote:
No. He was arrested for possessing the butterfly knife in conjunction with the escstasy that they later found
Fair enough, I still think the recent stabbings in conjunction with the initial knife found rose to the level of the "dangerous" situations that allows for a more intrusive search.
Absent any of those in our hypo, I don't think the cop can open the console or glove box to seize a gun.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 4:58 pm to UpToPar
quote:
Absent any of those in our hypo, I don't think the cop can open the console or glove box to seize a gun.
Depends. In the OP's original scenario I stand by No.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 5:06 pm to Five0
We will have to disagree on the legality of the officers ability to secure a gun from the vehicle.
I will continue to do what is supported by our legal advisers as well as what's been supported by our courts.
As far as common sense police work and communicating with people. I know plenty how to do my job safely and courteously.
I encounter weapons inside of vehicles on a regular basis. Most of the time they don't have a conceal carry license. Not that it matters.
Most of the time (95%) I secure the weapon without fail.
I will continue to do what is supported by our legal advisers as well as what's been supported by our courts.
As far as common sense police work and communicating with people. I know plenty how to do my job safely and courteously.
I encounter weapons inside of vehicles on a regular basis. Most of the time they don't have a conceal carry license. Not that it matters.
Most of the time (95%) I secure the weapon without fail.
This post was edited on 11/13/13 at 5:08 pm
Posted on 11/13/13 at 5:09 pm to Who Me
quote:
As far as common sense police work and communicating with people. I know plenty how to do my job safely and courteously.
Was not implying that you did otherwise.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 5:40 pm to Who Me
dont offer up any unnecessary information to the cop and you dont have to worry about being treated like a criminal.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 7:34 pm to diat150
How is putting your gun in the trunk for like five minutes being treated like a criminal.
Seems like a good policy to me, I tell him, he makes sure he is comfortable. I don't get shot by a dumbass because I reach toward my glovebox during the stop.
Seems like a good policy to me, I tell him, he makes sure he is comfortable. I don't get shot by a dumbass because I reach toward my glovebox during the stop.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 8:15 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
How is putting your gun in the trunk for like five minutes being treated like a criminal.
Seems like a good policy to me, I tell him, he makes sure he is comfortable. I don't get shot by a dumbass because I reach toward my glovebox during the stop.
I see no reason at all to go thru all of that just because I have a gun in my car. the cop is the one walking around with guns, batons, and tazers. If anyone should feel uncomfortable it is me. You are much more likely to get shot by a cop than he is by you.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 8:21 pm to swanny297
quote:
Who Me to Swanny: You are late to the game on this. No one here is arguing if the driver has to tell the officer about it. We know the answer to that.
I don't think Swanny is late to the game in terms of being correct. He's correct, or else LSP's CHP Unit is incorrect.
Carrying in a vehicle isn't Concealed Carry as defined by the statutes and rules that regulate Concealed Handgun Permits in Louisiana. Of course this thread has gotten confusing to many members because of the hodge-podge of cases cited from numerous jurisdictions.
In Louisiana you're not carrying concealed until you step out of that vehicle. As Swanny alluded, it's not unlike carrying in your home -- although one La. attorney has posted numerous times on another board that you can't carry legally in your home w/o a permit.
Several have cited the rule that says you must inform the cop if he approaches you in an offical manner. This is part of the CHP regulations. And until you are asked to "step out of the car," you aren't carrying concealed, even if it's on your person.
BEFORE you step out of the car you're required to notify the LEO that you're packing (because as soon as you step out, your in the CCW arena) -- and if he wants to disarm you he has every right to do so, for his safety. But he is also supposed to return your weapon when he leaves.
While you won't find it in the La. Constitution, (but you will find this verbiage in La. R.S. 14:92 (C)(5): Any constitutionally protected activity which cannot be regulated by the state, such as a firearm contained entirely within a motor vehicle. This is listed as one of eight exemptions to possessing a gun on a school campus ("Firerm Free Zone"). So our legislators have some feelings about your car being an extension of your home.
Tecnically, carrying while you're in your vehicle isn't CCW (just like it isn't CCW when you carry in your home). Do you want to get into that debate ? -- probably not in Orleans Parish, unless you have mucho dineros for a court fight. You'll win in court (probably) but you won't beat the ride.
KG6 posted that we're taught in CHP classes that "you have to inform an officer that you have a concealed weapon during an official (traffic) stop." Maybe in some classes, but not in mine.
Is it a good idea to tell the LEO that you have a weapon in the car -- depends. For sure, lying about it would//could be pretty bad.
Is it a good idea to hand over your CHP along with your driver's license ? Statistically (anecdotally) the odds seem to be in your favor (odds of avoiding the ticket) if you do so. But there are some cops who feel the "average citizen" shouldn't be armed, and in those cases you may end up wishing you hadn't.
FOR SURE (based on a lot of anecdotal evidence) I wouldn't volunteer this to cops in New Orleans. In that town, especially during carnival season, you may find yourself in Central Lockup if you're caught carrying concealed (with a permit) within 1000' of a parade route. The Yats think their local ordinances supersede state statutes. Again -- you'll win in court, but you won't beat the ride.
Disclaimer: I am not a LEO. I am not a lawyer. But I have had the occasion to discuss this on a somewhat regular basis with several Sgts. who have commanded LSP's CHP unit over the years, and with a number of very experienced attorneys who have very succcessful practices.
I could be wrong about all this stuff. And based on the previous 15 pages, even if I'm right someone is gonna tell me I'm wrong. So, I'm not gonna lose any sleep over it, nor am I gonna get into the kinds of debates that have expanded this thread to its current length. I'd rather drink a beer and watch reruns of Gilligan's Island.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 8:25 pm to dawg23
quote:
Is it a good idea to tell the LEO that you have a weapon in the car -- depends. For sure, lying about it would//could be pretty bad.
i am interested to hear what some of the leo's here would do in this siutation.
Posted on 11/13/13 at 8:31 pm to diat150
quote:
Is it a good idea to tell the LEO that you have a weapon in the car -- depends. For sure, lying about it would//could be pretty bad.
quote:
am interested to hear what some of the leo's here would do in this siutation.
If a person lied about having a weapon in the vehicle and I found out there was a weapon through other means.
The person would be subject to a pat frisk
The vehicle would be checked for additional weapons.
The person would very likely be issued a traffic citation for the original purpose of the stop.
Popular
Back to top


2





