Started By
Message

re: Cooling Barrel When Sighting It In?

Posted on 8/24/23 at 9:57 pm to
Posted by saintsfan1977
Arkansas, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
8903 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

This is quite possibly the dumbest thing I’ve heard when it comes to loading rounds. Unless you have some typos in here, do not ever load ammo for anyone other than yourself. How do you develop a load WITHOUT load development?! You just grab powder and blindly pour it into a cartridge and then slap some lead/copper on top and go “looks good to me!”????


No. It's simple. Load 3 rounds. One at book max, one at half a grain below max, one at 1 grain below max. Shoot from low to high. Once pressure is found use the lower charge. And book max is not always max charge. It could be higher than book max. Every rifle is different. We want half a grain under pressure signs.

Seating depth doesn't matter. Mag length is fine or put the boattail at the start of the shoulder of the case. Not the neck junction, the shoulder body junction.

Once you have no pressure shoot 10 at that charge weight. If they all fall into an inch, your handloading is done. If it's 3 inch group, change powder or bullets. No need to waste any more time. That's it.

You think this is dumb?

Your 3 rd ladder tests aren't showing you anything. You can shoot a 3 rd ladder test every day and get a different result every day.

Shoot 10 straight shots. If your gun puts 10 in a 2 or 3in group, switch bullets or powder. No seating depth or powder charge will fix that. It's a waste of time and money to shoot anymore of that combination.

If you don't believe my method works, it's simple:

Shoot 10 shots back to back with your load. Measure the group. None of this internet 3 round 0.5 moa group nonsense either. A legit 10round group.

Do my method and measure the group to compare. Shoot them both at distance. I'll bet you anything the results are the same.

For the average person /hunter/handloader this method will achieve everything you need in much less time and money spent.






This post was edited on 8/25/23 at 4:47 am
Posted by A_bear
baton rouge
Member since Sep 2013
2285 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 5:01 am to
You’re still doing load development. Your method is just different from the majority of hand loaders. Loading 3 rounds at max, half grain and 1 grain down, is load development. Most people do 3-5 rounds per powder charge, but if 1 works for you then do what works. It’s still load development though. So you can’t really say load development is a waste of time lol
Posted by saintsfan1977
Arkansas, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
8903 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 5:08 am to
quote:

You’re still doing load development. Your method is just different from the majority of hand loaders. Loading 3 rounds at max, half grain and 1 grain down, is load development. Most people do 3-5 rounds per powder charge, but if 1 works for you then do what works. It’s still load development though. So you can’t really say load development is a waste of time lol


Im not looking for group size with powder charges. I'm looking for pressure. That's the difference.

For the majority It's a waste of time doing seating depth testing and powder charge testing with 3rd groups. Chasing your tail.

Benchrest and F-class have to find what works and what doesn't but they're spending thousands of dollars $$$$$ to do it and shooting thousands of rounds per year.

The average person doesn't have the time or funds for that. So, 13 shots and you're most likely done with hand loading. The rest of your time is spent shooting at distance.

This post was edited on 8/25/23 at 5:11 am
Posted by 257WBY
Member since Feb 2014
6811 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 6:27 am to
Tiger on the Hill, most of us aren’t shooting prairie dog towns. We’re getting a rifle ready for one shot on a cool day. And unlike prairie dogs popping up, we may have waited several years for a particular buck to show up.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
69175 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 6:59 am to
Hes right.

I was sent a video a while back called "your groups are too small." Covers a lot of things most of us kinda subconsciously know (at least I did) but never wanted to admit because ammo costs too much.

The moral of the story was basically all the "flyers" we like to blame on things like hot barrels are really just regular shots within the rifles regular accuracy cone.

Most of our rifles are less accurate than we want to admit and it's not due to barrel heat, bullets being seating 0.005" more etc etc. It's due to us not shooting statistically significant groups to find out how accurate it really is or what the zero really is.

That's one extreme, the other extreme being shoot one and call it good if you like where it landed. I'm in the middle. I aint shooting 10+ shot groups for a rifle that costs $65 to shoot 10 times. I've gotten far less concerned about "the flyer," within reason, admitted to myself that my rifles probably a 1.5 - 2 MOA rifle, and decided that's just fine for killin.
Posted by TheDrunkenTigah
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
17885 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 7:27 am to
quote:

Most of our rifles are less accurate than we want to admit and it's not due to barrel heat, bullets being seating 0.005" more etc etc. It's due to us not shooting statistically significant groups to find out how accurate it really is or what the zero really is.


Never argued with any of that, but the size of the “cone” shrinks with a number of factors, ammo being one. That’s not mine or some dude on rokslide’s, opinion it’s a fact. No, most people can’t shoot as good as their gun with even factory ammo, and most “moa guarantees” are bullshite because the fine print is they get to take those steps to shrink the cone on their bench, but plenty can shoot better and they get a lot of benefit from load development, based on what their goals are. If max velo was all I cared about in a load, I’d buy a bigger gun. No offense dude but six months ago you were on here asking how handloading worked.
Posted by TheDrunkenTigah
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
17885 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 7:43 am to
quote:

Once you have no pressure shoot 10 at that charge weight. If they all fall into an inch, your handloading is done. If it's 3 inch group, change powder or bullets. No need to waste any more time. That's it.


You just did load development to find max velocity in your chamber, with that powder and bullet. Nothing wrong with it, but you’re jumping to the point of the process that matters to you. If all that mattered to me was saving money and getting the most out speed out of a cartridge I’d buy a savage in an big magnum and shoot factory ammo, and in some cases I’ve done that.
Posted by Captain Rumbeard
Member since Jan 2014
5525 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 8:40 am to
quote:

I've since learned that load development is just wasting time and money. It's not doing what you think it is and is seldom repeatable.


I'd love to hear this one...

Because I've got a competition benchrest .308 that we took months both dialing in a round for it and finding the most consistent brass to tighten groups. Moly coatings and loading at the bench from only that brass. You can swat flies with it at 200 yards. You throw factory rounds in there or any other rounds for that matter and it's not going to get the same kind of group tightness. It will still be tight, but not like those that we've worked up.
Posted by Captain Rumbeard
Member since Jan 2014
5525 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 8:44 am to
quote:

For the average person /hunter/handloader this method will achieve everything you need in much less time and money spent.


Ohhhhh ok. I thought you were talking about actual accuracy and not hunting accuracy. For hunting accuracy you're right enough.
Posted by kengel2
Team Gun
Member since Mar 2004
32900 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 8:53 am to
quote:

Most of our rifles are less accurate than we want to admit and it's not due to barrel heat, bullets being seating 0.005" more etc etc. It's due to us not shooting statistically significant groups to find out how accurate it really is or what the zero really is.


There's a huge difference in MOA guns and MOA shooters.

Most times the guns are more capable than we are.
Posted by TigerOnThe Hill
Springhill, LA
Member since Sep 2008
7181 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 9:19 am to
quote:

We’re getting a rifle ready for one shot on a cool day. And unlike prairie dogs popping up, we may have waited several years for a particular buck to show up.

That's a good point. In that case, I'd suggest looking at shots only from a "cold bore." For example, I know my son's Savage 223 will reliably print the first shot ("cold bore" shot) w/ a different point of impact than follow up shots. For a deer hunting rifle, that wouldn't be acceptable. I doubt changing the individual load would affect its cold bore accuracy. It would certainly be very time consuming. I'd imagine cold bore shift is a function of the gun, not the load. If repeatable cold bore point of impact is the goal, one would have to shoot a group from a cold bore. I doubt any of the maneuvers being discussed here would effectively cool the barrel, other than waiting a long time between single shots. How long?? There's lots of internet discussion about cold bore accuracy/shift. I bet it'd be longer than I'd want to wait. It all depends on one's needs.
Posted by mtb010
San Antonio
Member since Sep 2009
5626 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 9:20 am to
I fully understand the excitement and the want to go and shoot now and shoot several rounds. I've always waited until late October to sight in for deer season because of the heat.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
69175 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 9:20 am to
Handloading doesn't really have anything to do with it. The same thing applies to buying 8 different kinds of factory ammo to figure out which one shoots best.

Odds are they all shoot damn near the same if you shot enough of them to really find out.

The trigger puller is by far the biggest influence on the whole situation, enough so that cooling a barrel off between shots, doing ladder tests for "nodes" etc is all pointless IMO. If you aren't trying to win competitions none of that matters at all.
Posted by saintsfan1977
Arkansas, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
8903 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Because I've got a competition benchrest .308 that we took months both dialing in a round for it and finding the most consistent brass to tighten groups. Moly coatings and loading at the bench from only that brass. You can swat flies with it at 200 yards. You throw factory rounds in there or any other rounds for that matter and it's not going to get the same kind of group tightness. It will still be tight, but not like those that we've worked up.


Competition benchrest. That's the difference. How much time and money was spent on your tiny groups? You can smash flies at 200 yds because you wanted that level of accuracy but it came with a price. Months of looking for a recipe.
This post was edited on 8/25/23 at 10:17 am
Posted by saintsfan1977
Arkansas, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
8903 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Ohhhhh ok. I thought you were talking about actual accuracy and not hunting accuracy. For hunting accuracy you're right enough.



If you want to pop your suspenders it's going to cost money and time.

You are trying to find a magic recipe. I get it. But remember, dead is dead.
Posted by Captain Rumbeard
Member since Jan 2014
5525 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 10:02 am to
quote:

How much time and money was spent on your tiny groups? You can smash flies at 200 yds because you wanted that level of accuracy but it came with a price. It doesn't kill any better.


Didn't realize that cost was a criteria. Yes, it's expensive and time consuming to get it that tight. But you're making broad sweeping statements about "accuracy" so I assumed you were talking about all of it.

I don't necessarily disagree with you about hunting rifles. You don't need fly swatter rifles to hit a basketball at a hundred yards.
Posted by saintsfan1977
Arkansas, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
8903 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 10:20 am to
quote:

But you're making broad sweeping statements about "accuracy" so I assumed you were talking about all of it.


No, 10 bullets in an inch is pretty damn accurate. 10 in a half inch is even more so. If money were no object we'd all shoot single hole rifles and drive Ferrari but it is the limiting factor in almost everything
Posted by TheDrunkenTigah
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
17885 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Odds are they all shoot damn near the same if you shot enough of them to really find out.


Absolutely not. Go shoot an entire box each of 8 different factory loads, and there are going to be significant differences in the groups, or size of the “cone”. What you’re saying is the differences in the size of those groups don’t matter to you, or that most people can’t shoot well enough to see those differences, but they absolutely exist.

I laugh at people claiming they have a 1/2 MOA gun when they likely couldn’t put 10 into a softball as much as anyone, but you’re glossing over the propagation of error.

Ammo differences, POI shifts due to barrel (and action) temp, trigger form, scope parallax/magnification/tracking imparting a slight POI shift, and environmental conditions all contribute to where the bullet is gonna go and I’m probably still leaving stuff out. The contribution any individual factor makes might be small or large depending on the shooter or gun, but they all add up. Im a firm believer moment of pie plate is good enough to kill a deer, and sometimes one error will “correct” for the other, but it’s still not that hard to stack enough frickups on top of one another to hit gut instead of lung. How many deer you see a year spined, liver, or gut hit? Those are the extreme examples, but even for a competent shooter the more of those factors you work through and rule out, the better odds you have of recovering an animal cleanly. Load development/ammo is one factor entirely within your control, at your leisure, and also one that also forces you to spend time on the trigger and address the others, so I hardly consider that a waste of time or money. Whether it’s from floating, the chamber, lockup, or improperly torqued action screws, a lot of lower cost sporter contour hunting rifles are gonna see POI shifts from a cold bore shot, and it’s not a waste of time to at least understand if your gun has an issue with it or not.


Posted by JDPndahizzy
JDP
Member since Nov 2013
6841 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

I laugh at people claiming they have a 1/2 MOA gun


I'm surprised no one has mentioned the major difference between all of this shite yet...

I'm an above average shooter at the range but my last buck I couldn't tell you if my eyes were open when I jerked the trigger or if I was even breathing.. I do remember my heart jumping out of my chest and hearing the ladder on the box blind rattle because of my shaky legs though!!!
Posted by TheDrunkenTigah
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
17885 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

couldn't tell you if my eyes were open when I jerked the trigger or if I was even breathing..


Yep, a lot of this is about building forgiveness into it, to help you when you’re about to shite your pants. A good light trigger, dialed in ammo, and understanding how your POI might shift are all things you can do before that moment to shave a few inches off the prayer you throw up.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram