- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/29/20 at 6:49 pm to AlxTgr
What does that mean ?
Posted on 1/29/20 at 6:54 pm to ecb
It means the people that sued get their land / water bottoms back. So a lot of folks that have been hunting for free - won’t
Posted on 1/29/20 at 6:59 pm to choupiquesushi
Oh Snap!
Never figured it would hold up but this is fantastic news.
Never figured it would hold up but this is fantastic news.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 7:08 pm to KemoSabe65
I felt all along it would. They have needed a 1/2 reduction in pressure.
Gonna need a sheriffs flotilla
Gonna need a sheriffs flotilla
Posted on 1/29/20 at 7:46 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:What makes you think this?
It means the people that sued get their land / water bottoms back. So a lot of folks that have been hunting for free - won’t
Posted on 1/29/20 at 7:55 pm to AlxTgr
Read the opinion Alex. The Supremes upheld the plaintiffs ownership of the Lake, but took their damages for the States flooding of their land away. It’s over, and now there will be a war on that Lake this fall.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 7:55 pm to PinevilleTiger
Sounds like the Discovery Channel could have a new show “Duck Wars”
Posted on 1/29/20 at 7:58 pm to AlxTgr
So what happens to all the wildlife living in the lake. The public own the game, including the fish. Anytime a private landowner wishes to fence his property to house pen raised deer, he must first push out all the wild publicly owned game. So what will happen to all those fish these landowners aren't legally entitled to own. Does this means we as citizens can remove them by any means necessary, as in electrical shocking, commercial nets, etc? These landowners aren't entitled to a private lake that was stocked by a state agency.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 7:58 pm to wickowick
It’s gonna be ugly! Some of those baws families been hunting the same blinds for over 100 years.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 7:59 pm to PinevilleTiger
Will be quite interesting around September. Assuming the heirs know what’s theirs and can post or get the law involved?
Posted on 1/29/20 at 8:00 pm to boudinman
First thing that will likely happen is the State is going to dynamite the control structure. Therefore, there won’t be any fish to take.
This post was edited on 1/29/20 at 8:01 pm
Posted on 1/29/20 at 8:08 pm to PinevilleTiger
quote:
First thing that will likely happen is the State is going to dynamite the control structure. Therefore, there won’t be any fish to take.
They should do that then. Leave one huge mud wallow for the feral hogs to enjoy.
This post was edited on 1/29/20 at 8:09 pm
Posted on 1/29/20 at 8:20 pm to PinevilleTiger
I have a decent spot now so don’t have as much of a skin in the game but royally frick all the squatters on wma’s and catahoula who felt they were entitled to their spots.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:01 pm to AlxTgr
AlxTiger are you a lawyer?
Looks like they gave them some damages and didn’t others.
Looks like they gave them some damages and didn’t others.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:21 pm to PinevilleTiger
quote:
PinevilleTiger
First thing that will likely happen is the State is going to dynamite the control structure. Therefore, there won’t be any fish to take.
That ain’t happening......
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:24 pm to boudinman
quote:
So what happens to all the wildlife living in the lake. The public own the game, including the fish. Anytime a private landowner wishes to fence his property to house pen raised deer, he must first push out all the wild publicly owned game. So what will happen to all those fish these landowners aren't legally entitled to own. Does this means we as citizens can remove them by any means necessary, as in electrical shocking, commercial nets, etc? These landowners aren't entitled to a private lake that was stocked by a state agency.
No different than Atchafalaya basin
I think some big dogs are lining up to try to lease one big chunk.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:44 pm to PinevilleTiger
quote:. Looks like the plaintiffs are awarded nearly $5mm in royalties as well, not to mention what’s held in suspense since 2006. Landmen finna eat running title in Lasalle and Rapides Ph. What a hairball mess that will be.
Read the opinion Alex. The Supremes upheld the plaintiffs ownership of the Lake, but took their damages for the States flooding of their land away. It’s over, and now there will be a war on that Lake this fall.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:21 pm to choupiquesushi
They may not literally “dynamite” the lock and dam, but I know one of the levee district members. If he gets his way, the structure will be dismantled. It would be illegal to use public funds to control water on private lands. Plus, the plaintiffs cite the structure as the cause for all their “damages”. The greedy “landowners” will have a big mud hole, just like it was before 1973.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:24 pm to choupiquesushi
So the lake is now private? These peopl3 stole the lake from us duck hunters? How is this good?
Page 11 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News