- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Biofuel Growth Is Decimating Wildlife Habitat in Corn Belt
Posted on 3/14/13 at 1:18 pm to JAB528
Posted on 3/14/13 at 1:18 pm to JAB528
quote:
Who? The liberal based media? Biofuels are a crock of shite, just look at what ethanol does to small engines. I also get better gas mileage when I run 100% gasoline. The gains don't outweigh the losses you get manufacturing biofuels IMO. Its just a way to make the hippies happy.
Dude, stop being obstinate. Global warming is absolutely happening. Every sensor we have is showing it. Now, how much of that warming is anthropomorphic is up for debate, but there is no debating that global warming is occurring.
Posted on 3/14/13 at 1:27 pm to wiltznucs
quote:
The academic centers from the world over all agree on GW... If you want a challenge, find a single peer reviewed scientific journal article published in the past five years that refutes Global Warming is occuring. I'll save you the work and tell you there arent many. If you do find one, then look who sponsored it and I'll bet you a beer that it was funded by a Big Oil related company. Since we're discussing science we will not be counting any articles published by a blogger, journalist or scientist that refused to submit to peer review. Those are nothing more than Op-Ed pieces...
The evidence is irrefutable and undeniable, the planet has in fact gotten warmer over the past century plus. We have hard data that proves it. What's debatable and will never be truly known is whether or not its entirely a result of human activity or if some part of the warming is associated with normal planetary heating and cooling cycles. The Scientific/Academic community seems to think the timing corresponds so well to the Industrial Revolution to modern era that man is certainly the dominant factor.
To be clear, I'm with you in that biofuel and green energy has major issues right now. A very interesting debate topic that some folks could go on for days about.
I enjoyed that well thought out and written post. I wasn't sure if the people making those comments actually believed that GW wasn't happening.
Posted on 3/14/13 at 1:28 pm to ZacAttack
quote:
Unfortunately corn is now king. It's in almost everything we eat, we feed it to all livestock and now we are fueling our cars with it. Until we once again diversify the crops grown in the US, and stop burning corn for fuel, Land use will not return to the way it was. Unfortunately the government retards have mandated that corn be used for fuel, and like others have said already you could grow corn from sea to shining sea and still not have enough to fuel all the cars. That is why corn production will continue to increase. Once again big brother has screwed us over.
As an aside, there are currently discussions ongoing within the Obama administration and a couple of cabinet posts about eliminating the ethanol subsidy. Basically, the price of corn has hit a point where it is getting close to impossible to justify it from an economic standpoint (subsidizing poor farmers ) and it is already very hard to justify from an energy balance standpoint. Personally, I really hope it goes away, and the sooner the better.
Renewable energy is a bit of a con job, too. Renewable energy sources should only be subsidized where they work in a very efficient manner. Paying federal tax dollars for someone to install a PV system in North Dakota makes no damn sense. We need a frank discussion to go down where we shift the focus from "potential capacity" to "viable potential capacity." Unfortunately, the big proponents (their backing comes from large corporations, not stinking hippies) don't care that it is used efficiently, just that sales increase.
Another huge con job: high efficiency plug-in electric cars. The cars themselves are technically efficient, but the system that charges the car (generation->transmission->distribution->conversion->charging) is extremely inefficient from an energy balance standpoint.
Posted on 3/14/13 at 1:29 pm to wiltznucs
I think something like 97% of scientists back global warming. Just to add to wiltz's comment on that. Coincidence that a lot are govt funded?
ETA learned last semester that electric cars are worse for the environment that ethanol run cars. :hippies:
ETA learned last semester that electric cars are worse for the environment that ethanol run cars. :hippies:
This post was edited on 3/14/13 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 3/14/13 at 1:37 pm to wiltznucs
quote:
To be clear, I'm with you in that biofuel and green energy has major issues right now. A very interesting debate topic that some folks could go on for days about.
Fwiw, I wasn't bashing you politically.
I was just making the point that most of the far left media, makes it out to be worse than it is.
While climate change is undoubtably happening, it is happening because its supposed to. It's the same situation that happened with the ice age. This is JMO of course.
Posted on 3/14/13 at 1:38 pm to JAB528
quote:
t's the same situation that happened with the ice age
It warmed then because of all the methane from mammoth farts.
Posted on 3/14/13 at 2:36 pm to tenfoe
The areas of ND and MT losing CRP are NOT the corn belt. Those acres are going to wheat and canola. The CRP program is nothing more than the Federal Government renting farm ground. In recent years they haven't beem offering anything near the market rate so landowners are farming it instead. Conservatives like me are happy to see CRP go away. The Federal Government shouldn't use tax dollars to rent farm ground.
Posted on 3/14/13 at 2:40 pm to JAB528
Late to the party, but just my $0.02.
No doubt global warming is real. But it's arrogant to think that roughly 100 years of industry is really a thread to the planet. The planet is how old? 6 billion years roughly? It has endured everything the entire cosmos could throw at it in that time, asteroids, comets, solar flares, black holes, super novas, volcanos, superstorms, mass extinctions, rise and fall of seas, ice ages, droughts, famine, and we really think a few years of plastic bags and a few internal combustion engines are gonna be the death of it?
No doubt global warming is real. But it's arrogant to think that roughly 100 years of industry is really a thread to the planet. The planet is how old? 6 billion years roughly? It has endured everything the entire cosmos could throw at it in that time, asteroids, comets, solar flares, black holes, super novas, volcanos, superstorms, mass extinctions, rise and fall of seas, ice ages, droughts, famine, and we really think a few years of plastic bags and a few internal combustion engines are gonna be the death of it?
Posted on 3/14/13 at 2:52 pm to DrTyger
quote:
we really think a few years of plastic bags and a few internal combustion engines are gonna be the death of it?
I don't think anyone is worried about killing the earth. The fear is killing the majority of people living on earth.
Regardless of global warming, I think we can all agree that pollution is not a good thing. CO2 makes it harder to catch your breath.
Posted on 3/14/13 at 2:55 pm to Jester
quote:
I don't think anyone is worried about killing the earth. The fear is killing the majority of people living on earth.
Then say that. Don't say save the earth. That's just arrogant and manipulative.
And of course pollution is not a good thing.
Posted on 3/14/13 at 3:18 pm to Springfield XD
CRP is a 10 to 15 year program, depending on species. In the south we plant pine trees,( 10 year contract )and hardwoods, (15 year contract). There are grassland contracts out west and north, not sure of the legth of contracts. A lot of the contracts are renewed yearly, many are not.The rent paid is to put farmland into the different native species, not farm rent.
A landowner can actually "buy out" of the CRP contract if he wants, by paying back all costs and funds he has received. This has actually happened in some cases when it has become much more profitable to farm the tract instead of collect the WRP payments. This could contribute to the decline of the acreage. Wetlnda tracts are like AIDS, (perpetual).
The entire idea, at this particular moment in time when we are soaring to a $20 trillion plus debt,that we are paying for some of these very expensive conservation programs is mind-blowing.
Wetlands Reserve Program easements are bringing in $1400 per acre and CRP payments over a 10 year period can go a lot higher over the 10-15 year contract. I think this is one area we can cut back significantly, budget wise. Just don't flippin do it for a couple of years.
In my opinion, in the next 25 years a majority of these tracts taken out of Ag production will be turned back into farmland at TAXPAYER expense. We will need the acreage.
A landowner can actually "buy out" of the CRP contract if he wants, by paying back all costs and funds he has received. This has actually happened in some cases when it has become much more profitable to farm the tract instead of collect the WRP payments. This could contribute to the decline of the acreage. Wetlnda tracts are like AIDS, (perpetual).
The entire idea, at this particular moment in time when we are soaring to a $20 trillion plus debt,that we are paying for some of these very expensive conservation programs is mind-blowing.
Wetlands Reserve Program easements are bringing in $1400 per acre and CRP payments over a 10 year period can go a lot higher over the 10-15 year contract. I think this is one area we can cut back significantly, budget wise. Just don't flippin do it for a couple of years.
In my opinion, in the next 25 years a majority of these tracts taken out of Ag production will be turned back into farmland at TAXPAYER expense. We will need the acreage.
Posted on 3/14/13 at 3:20 pm to eyepooted
Frick iowa i hate that state
Posted on 3/14/13 at 3:30 pm to LSUCouyon
So whats worse.
or the govt handing out money to large farmers?
I personally would rather drilling pads and pipelines running through my land than it covered in corn
quote:
The entire idea, at this particular moment in time when we are soaring to a $20 trillion plus debt,that we are paying for some of these very expensive conservation programs is mind-blowing.
or the govt handing out money to large farmers?
I personally would rather drilling pads and pipelines running through my land than it covered in corn
Posted on 3/14/13 at 3:33 pm to wiltznucs
Yes the globe is warming, that same fricking way its been warming and cooling since it was fricking created. It a natural occurrence, we cool off and get ice ages and mini ice ages "the cause for the dark ages". Then we warm up and whole thing repeats itself. Its not pollution, if you want to bitch about something bitch about every piece of woods in 10 square mile being leveled for endless fricking strip malls and fricking neighborhoods. China pollutes, frick the gov and the worthless fricking president and ethanol.
This post was edited on 3/14/13 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 3/14/13 at 3:36 pm to WhistlinDixie87
damit now I am all pissed and high blood pressure.
And yea frickers I am whistlin Dixie
And yea frickers I am whistlin Dixie
This post was edited on 3/14/13 at 3:36 pm
Posted on 3/14/13 at 3:36 pm to WhistlinDixie87
I don't think you're just whistlin Dixie.
Posted on 3/14/13 at 3:41 pm to DrTyger
quote:
Don't say save the earth. That's just arrogant and manipulative.
I haven't seen anyone say that here.
Posted on 3/14/13 at 3:49 pm to Jester
Renewable energy and biofuels are a crock of shite. They are completely net energy negative. Subsidies are also a bit of a lie, for every dollar the farmer gets, eight goes to agribusiness (Kellogg's, Nestlé, Monsanto etc). Back on topic, climate change happens, however I can't believe that people are arrogant enough to believe that we either caused it or can slow/stop it. Biofuels are a waste, I've seen bio-oil, it's really just tar, it won't burn, it has the consistency of burnt motor oil, it's useless, but the government has adopted it asthe newest boondoggle. The only way to eliminate using fossil fuels is to develop an engine that has the same power and uses some other fuel.
Posted on 3/14/13 at 3:52 pm to Jester
i was just speaking in general, not addressing anyone specific.
Posted on 3/14/13 at 3:57 pm to ZacAttack
Even then we do not get rid of fossil fuels.
The amount of products from fossil fuels is unbelievable. Refining and chemical plants have created a society dependant upon every molecule that is in a fossil fuel.
Wax, milk cartons, plastic, asphalt, rubbers.. you name it, it damn near has a tie to a fossil fuel.
The amount of products from fossil fuels is unbelievable. Refining and chemical plants have created a society dependant upon every molecule that is in a fossil fuel.
Wax, milk cartons, plastic, asphalt, rubbers.. you name it, it damn near has a tie to a fossil fuel.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News